Look, you are obviously trying to associate "your Columbus letter to the narration in the Beale Papers." My question to you is simply this, "What provenance do you possess that establishes this connection?" You see, here's the thing you're not understanding at all.....per example, there exist hundreds of shipwrecks on the east coast of Florida, one of those the well documented wreck of the Trinity, but in order for anyone to establish that they have actually discovered that particular wreck then they need something from that wreck that conclusively establishes that, yes, it is the wreck of the Trinity. They can't just pick out any of those wrecks and claim that they have found the Trinity. So before you can proceed down all of these roads that you are presenting it is required that you have some type of provenance that you are even in the same part of the world, let alone that you have discovered connection between that Columbus letter and the Beale treasure tale narration. So once again, "what provenance do you have that connects your Columbus letter to the Beale treasure narration?" So what provenance in regards to the Beale treasure tale narration do you possess that lead you to this Columbus letter?
...and this is a very-very short list! "Facts first!" And you have absolutely zero supporting evidences or facts that are relevant to the original subject matter. You're doing "exactly" as Eldo. "Exactly!" So go ahead, pick any of these other treasure tales......since you could easily connect them to the Beale Narration in exactly the same fashion you may as well include them all, right?.....
