What's new

Dent’s Run. Here We Go Again!

You just cant explain why the FBI brought sch a large contingency if the already knew THE GOLD WAS NOT THERE...but your sure there wasn't any gold....?

yOur poSt isn't evidence the F.B.I. saw gold in Dents run.

I can't explain? i don't have to explain the F.B.I.'s scope.. i don't care if it was all the king's horses and all the king's men.

Why don't you investigate ? You legally can you know. Start with the F.B.I..
IF you are careful it won't be sheets of redactions to show for you efforts.
I don't run the F.B.I..
Nor do I study the F.B.I.. I'm just not that bored with life.
But knock yourself out and you won't have to be upset that I don't explain to you how the F.B.I. operates or provide an inventory of who hauled what.
Last I knnew they didn't sork on commission but like I stated I don't study the F.B.I..
The pictorial evidencedidn't show to many folks for a field trip. But then how many is too many?
It takes five county road workers for one shovel to be leaned on and month allowed before having to pay for damage from a pothole if it isn't filled AFTER it is reported. Should the F.B.I. be more efficient?
A fieldtrip would be exciting . More so for the rookies . (Shovel leaner uponers.) Scour the evidence yourself to see. Oh , that ones a rake . They must be raking gold bars out of the removed material!

 
yOur poSt isn't evidence the F.B.I. saw gold in Dents run.

I can't explain? i don't have to explain the F.B.I.'s scope.. i don't care if it was all the king's horses and all the king's men.

Why don't you investigate ? You legally can you know. Start with the F.B.I..
IF you are careful it won't be sheets of redactions to show for you efforts.
I don't run the F.B.I..
Nor do I study the F.B.I.. I'm just not that bored with life.
But knock yourself out and you won't have to be upset that I don't explain to you how the F.B.I. operates or provide an inventory of who hauled what.
Last I knnew they didn't sork on commission but like I stated I don't study the F.B.I..
The pictorial evidencedidn't show to many folks for a field trip. But then how many is too many?
It takes five county road workers for one shovel to be leaned on and month allowed before having to pay for damage from a pothole if it isn't filled AFTER it is reported. Should the F.B.I. be more efficient?
A fieldtrip would be exciting . More so for the rookies . (Shovel leaner uponers.) Scour the evidence yourself to see. Oh , that ones a rake . They must be raking gold bars out of the removed
 
Everybody knows gold bars are to heavy to rake but this is you being funnie ...but just cant explain why the Fbi sent such a large heavily armed contingency ..was to protect the gold they knew was there...prove me wrong
 
Everybody knows gold bars are to heavy to rake but this is you being funnie ...but just cant explain why the Fbi sent such a large heavily armed contingency ..was to protect the gold they knew was there...prove me wrong

Sure. And if there is more than one person in an office there must be more than meets the eye.

There is a picture of someone with a rake in the prior thread of F.B.I. activities at the equipment dig site. Possibly female looking. Ponytail and khakis perhaps. Not sure of ballcap or stretchy cap but seeing a tail wants a ballcap. It's been a minute or months though.
There may have been an eggbeater out of the camera view too for all I know.
The rake is early in the excavator work pics. A cut being made lengthwise with the cut on the offside.
Would I be surprised at an egg beater being wielded?
No more than if a gold bar peeked out of a tree.
After all of the F.B.I. has a rake it can have an egg beater.

Any proof the F.B.I. saw gold yet?

THE mass of participants thrust against the tiny dig site doesn't mean the F.B.I. saw any gold.
But I'll give you the doubt of if the F.B,.I. saw gold before the mass of humanity was packed into the site , or if the F.B.I. saw gold after the mass of troops at the site. Heck you can even declare the F.B.I. saw gold during the dig.
But you'll still need to provide evidence or it's just more hoke..

I saw a parade a while back.
That doesn't mean someone saw gold. Or that gold exists at the exact end of the rainbow.
Id gold bars exist uphill unmolested by Prads or government officials or squirrels or oompa loompas they are still not where gold was indicated without gold existing.
Big difference.
Let alone tons of gold vs some bars.

Piggy backing claims on others prior claims is a cheap but effective way to entertain the attention of rubes.
everyone wants into the act with media today. It 's easy!
Thus the fight for drama.
Blahh.
todays streamerson MSN homepage could gag a garbage can.
Might be an accidental fact tying to escape but don't wager much on it. That's not the purpose.
But gimmie a click if you would. it's appreciated.
Subscribers today only will recieve inside scoop exclusive first releases too!
 
1776364906484.webp

Compare the picture to the pan results.
But hey look! Gold! Look at how much!
i do like the first picture though. Plenty of justification to insist I saw the guy with a huge bunch of gold. Right?


 
In most cases, it's virtually impossible to prove a negative. Much easier to prove a positive.
 
View attachment 2250935
This man went to his grave with 2 of the 50 pound gold bars from Bell Draft
Hicks Run. (Near; during a survey survey.)
Sample under a bed. Canvas skinned.
Reminds of a candle box under a bed elsewhere almost.

Were the duo bars those tarred?
 
Nothing new here except Sergeant’s picture of the headstone.

Thanks for that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom