sidvail
Sr. Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2013
- Messages
- 255
- Reaction score
- 97
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Cottonwood, CA
- Primary Interest:
- Prospecting
How much of an affect does the difficulty of access have on your prospecting? Like lack of roads, too far to hike, etc. And does elevation also affect it?
I've noticed that the farther up the mountains, or farther past the road system, etc., the less claims are staked. (this could be misleading also, but so far proven true on my few searches).
Now I know that the current road systems in gold county, California (Hwy 49, etc) are a result of many things, gold rush included. So maybe the roads weren't taken that far out due to lack of color in those areas, or mountains too high? Access was too difficult?
I guess what I'm asking is, were the old timers tough enough to hit those hard to reach places? Did they find there was just not enough gold to make it worth while? Did they search up into the mountains as strongly as they did the lower elevations? Do prospectors of today do that?
I know there are a lot of reasons why claims are abandoned. Lack of gold being the foremost. But I bet lack of energy or perseverance is high on the list also. Are those areas worth it to someone who has the time and energy?
I've seen very little discussion on elevation when it comes to gold. I believe Colorado had some very high places (10,000 ft?) that were producing, so 6000 to 8000 feet in California should not be impossible. Of course the higher you go, the less placer you'd find. Not enough tributaries or watersheds to contribute I'd guess. After all, you're at the top.
Just wondering why the lack of claims on what look like great water systems (no dams) with plenty of drop and volume. I'm going to be backpacking in one of these areas I've researched (Eldorado County) and think I'll spend a couple weeks panning some of these higher elevation streams and creeks. Exploring mostly, but you never know. The less people up there, the more chance of finding a nice creek with some color in it.
I've noticed that the farther up the mountains, or farther past the road system, etc., the less claims are staked. (this could be misleading also, but so far proven true on my few searches).
Now I know that the current road systems in gold county, California (Hwy 49, etc) are a result of many things, gold rush included. So maybe the roads weren't taken that far out due to lack of color in those areas, or mountains too high? Access was too difficult?
I guess what I'm asking is, were the old timers tough enough to hit those hard to reach places? Did they find there was just not enough gold to make it worth while? Did they search up into the mountains as strongly as they did the lower elevations? Do prospectors of today do that?
I know there are a lot of reasons why claims are abandoned. Lack of gold being the foremost. But I bet lack of energy or perseverance is high on the list also. Are those areas worth it to someone who has the time and energy?
I've seen very little discussion on elevation when it comes to gold. I believe Colorado had some very high places (10,000 ft?) that were producing, so 6000 to 8000 feet in California should not be impossible. Of course the higher you go, the less placer you'd find. Not enough tributaries or watersheds to contribute I'd guess. After all, you're at the top.
Just wondering why the lack of claims on what look like great water systems (no dams) with plenty of drop and volume. I'm going to be backpacking in one of these areas I've researched (Eldorado County) and think I'll spend a couple weeks panning some of these higher elevation streams and creeks. Exploring mostly, but you never know. The less people up there, the more chance of finding a nice creek with some color in it.
Upvote
0