Something interesting in the existing news article Schall is quoted as saying of the alleged finder... “he has promised he will leave the gold to Schall when he dies”.
If you believe there is truth in the story told by Schall, then you are accepting his word that the alleged old man really existed and that he allegedly found two bars of gold. One can assume the old man could have passed and gifted the alleged gold bars to Schall. The fact is, even if two gold bars really existed, there is no proof of how they were acquired by the old man and/or where they could have originated.
Of course, none of this has been proved and if
is being truthful in his assertions that Jack was lying about the old man and using the story as “cover, then you have been led in a complete circle of misleading information. By Sarge’s confession of Jack lying, there is just no credibility then to Jack’s story or any of these tales. Just good storytelling.