don't try to be the grown up goldwasher. please point out where I was insulting with an inflated ego.
really that sounds like you, satirical too. you talk crap about people in pm's all the time, if only the mods knew.
and you're taking things I've said out of context, I've never attempted to "discredit" geology.
read my posts and properly understand them pls.
Well telling people that they can't understand your superior knowledge would be one part.
Or that it would give me a head ache? lame
You have several times in previous thread shown that you don't quite understand geology in so far as how it is used in the present tense .
Claiming it is poorly understood in a thread where someone has a valid interest. I would consider that discrediting it. Telling people they don't really understand whats going on. Oh ok?
Going past Hydraulics, weathering, chemistry. All the things that add variables in the field. The practical things to understand. That matter today. Well, that's not going to help the miner with boots on the ground.
Again you get personal about it? I have THIRTEEN pages of sent messages. I have to empty my inbox often so I can answer pm's. The bulk of my out box messages are replies to messages sent to me.
I have like four with you. Not once do I even mention another member.
So, it would have to be another member telling you what I said to them. I have talked to another members about a few of our resident name changing shape shifting trolls or bots. Funny thing is that's probably who you had a pm with.
Maybe conversed about Madmarshalls hysteria? Or spoke less than kindly about my previous sluice box company ruining employer. I don't feel bad about a thing I've said at all.
Especially about the trolls.
As far as your statement that I talk crap on other members "all the time" is just plain BS
I challenge the mods, you or those that I have conversed with and mentioned another member to go ahead and report it to the mods.
I was not discriminating in my response to you or using a double standard.
I disagree that you are adding to the field. Mainly because I haven't seen you add anything. I do think you ignore facts. Based on your previously presented theories as well as the recent ones in this thread.
Please try to put what you are saying about geology. Its relationship to small scale prospecting and a members question about how much a degree will matter, into context.
From my experience the guy sharpening the pencils writing down symbols to explain things that can't be seen in real time. Well, he typically isn't the guy out there getting all the gold out of the ground or marking out where it will be found.
You know the ones out there dealing with it in real time. The ones enriching the industry.
I'm pretty sure that the O.P. wasn't interested in kinetics..time space... deep physics or theories. Papers that have not been released, peer reviewed or applied to industry standards.
I think he wants to know about rocks and chemicals and "recent" geology that is understood very well. So, he can add to his practical knowledge.
Not rewrite the books
The fact that they are so difficult to understand that just reading causes headaches...oh,never mind typing that made me chuckle and shake my head.
I'm done with my lunch back to chores. This has gone far enough down the wormho..eh hem.. I mean borehole.
Like I told you before. Go for it figure it out what ever it is you are trying to figure out. Guess I'll have to wait on the "Interdimensional Geology for Dummies" version.