Gold and Silver photo dowsing - this is only a test

[vor]

Sorry that you people don’t understand Dowsing...There are 100’s of testimonials on this board..there are photo’s of finds...There is threads with many test results on this board...Just like any other board on T-net...Art

Aart
I believe "us people" understand quite well.

BTW, self proclaimed testimonials (whether this board or others) carry no weight.

HH
V

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

~vor~
I believe "us people" understand quite well.

Yes we do understand the Skeptics thinking

BTW, self proclaimed testimonials (whether this board or others) carry no weight.

How many of the 3 million posts on T-net carry no weight...Art

 

[vor]

Yes we do understand the Skeptics thinking


How many of the 3 million posts on T-net carry no weight...Art

Aart
As stated, all self-proclaimed testimonials.
V

 

[aarthrj3811]

~art~

How many of the 3 million posts on T-net carry no weight...Art

~vor~

As stated, all self-proclaimed testimonials.

So everyone who says his or her devices work are wrong..Do you claim that todays finds are also self proclaimed testomoials?..Art

 

[vor]

~art~

~vor~
So everyone who says his or her devices work are wrong..Do you claim that todays finds are also self proclaimed testomoials?..Art

Yes, as far as carrying weight as proof.

It's not that I doubt many of them, but it just doesn't rise to the standard of proof of anything, other than they posted a find.

There is a big difference in "stating what happened" and "proving what happened".

V

 

[aarthrj3811]

~vor~
Yes, as far as carrying weight as proof.

Is that what you said

It's not that I doubt many of them, but it just doesn't rise to the standard of proof of anything, other than they posted a find.

OK... Legal burden of proof - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He who does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption, meaning he needs no evidence to support his claim. Fulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.
That puts the proof on the skeptics..

There is a big difference in "stating what happened" and "proving what happened".

Why is there a difference?...the truth is in the eyes of the beholder...It must be hard to be skeptical of everyone..Art

 

[Bigdogdad]

Desertphile- Read back on my questions as to how you came to be so sure that dowsing doesn't work. We don't have to prove crap to you or any one else. You are probably like a parrot, you can only repeat what you have been told. You probably have no experience in the real world when it comes to this subject. Please go back under the rock in the desert from where you came.

 

[vor]

Is that what you said
Yes

OK... Legal burden of proof - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He who does not carry the burden of proof carries the benefit of assumption, meaning he needs no evidence to support his claim. Fulfilling the burden of proof effectively captures the benefit of assumption, passing the burden of proof off to another party.
That puts the proof on the skeptics..

Art, we are not on trial here. Not even close to being a good comparison. We just want to see results of a test, not lock someone up.

Why is there a difference?...the truth is in the eyes of the beholder

Wrong. The truth is the truth and not subjective.

...It must be hard to be skeptical of everyone..Art

Its not hard being a skeptic, all you have to do is open your eyes and mind to logic, reason and the truth.

Vor

 

[aarthrj3811]

Gee vor....You come here and insult every dowser on this board. Now you have insulted a lot of t-net treasure hunters on the whole treasure net site....Just because you don’t understand what we do...As far as use proving anything we feel that we have proved our skills to the only people that count...Now if you have any proof that I can not locate and recover treasure with a set of Dowsing Rods put it on here or go away...Art

 

[vor]

Gee vor....You come here and insult every dowser on this board. Now you have insulted a lot of t-net treasure hunters on the whole treasure net site....Just because you don’t understand what we do...As far as use proving anything we feel that we have proved our skills to the only people that count...Now if you have any proof that I can not locate and recover treasure with a set of Dowsing Rods put it on here or go away...Art

Sure, just let me know what you find on the three photos I posted if you haven't seen the answer already.

I know, there is a reason why you can't because I just don't understand (probable answer).

V

 

[okiedowser]

art it can't be done, there a 4 picture's that he judge by. look at the 3 picture where the trees are to the right, that 3 difference picture taken with a camera the (4 picture only catch a little of the tree) ,this picture has the gold and silver in a difference spot, there no truth here.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~vor~

Sure, just let me know what you find on the three photos

I did your photo’s the same way I do all maps...I found nothing of interest to me...Why should I spend hours doing your photo’s?...If I am not enjoying what I am doing I will not do it...Art

 

[vor]

art it can't be done, there a 4 picture's that he judge by. look at the 3 picture where the trees are to the right, that 3 difference picture taken with a camera the (4 picture only catch a little of the tree)View attachment 759032View attachment 759033View attachment 759034View attachment 759035,this picture has the gold and silver in a difference spot, there no truth here.

Okie
Yes, it could have been done.

There were 3 photos posted. Only one had gold and silver buried. They were buried on the side of the hill, one near the top of the slope, the other near the bottom of the slope. The other two photos were taken before the gold and silver was buried and contained nothing.

The forth photo you must have obtained from BDD, it has flagging tied to bush/grass clump to identify the locations where they were buried in the one photo. They were buried at the base of the bush/grass .

While I appreciate your attempt, your area is where I would also have guessed - in the center of the photo. In that way, I would have the best chance of being close. But in this case, it was probably 50 yards away and would not lead me to check the hillside.

The test was not only for location but for presence/absence, which also apparently failed.

The verdict is in the books.

HH
V

 

[aarthrj3811]

~vor~

While I appreciate your attempt, your area is where I would also have guessed - in the center of the photo. In that way, I would have the best chance of being close. But in this case, it was probably 50 yards away and would not lead me to check the hillside.

Thank You

 

[billythekidder]

vor WOW!!!!!!!that's where I got it.....

 

[vor]

vor WOW!!!!!!!that's where I got it.....

Great! Then it works!

 

[Bigdogdad]

vor-So you had one person respond and you claim he failed so that means map dowsing doesn't work? What a joke. There is a huge difference between trying to prove something works versus trying to prove something doesn't work. You proved neither one. The dowsers on here have no need or incentive to try to convince the skeptics when the skeptics are not wanting to believe in dowsing. This thread is for dowsers, skeptics can spread their negativity elsewhere. Please!!!

 

[vor]

BDD
Settle down. Billy said he located the targets and I proclaimed that it worked.
Happy?
V

Some people only think they know.

Others know.

 

[billythekidder]

If people knew what they know then how would you know if it was known unless it was unknown.....but then again who knows!

 

[Doubter in MD]

vor-So you had one person respond and you claim he failed so that means map dowsing doesn't work? What a joke. There is a huge difference between trying to prove something works versus trying to prove something doesn't work. You proved neither one. The dowsers on here have no need or incentive to try to convince the skeptics when the skeptics are not wanting to believe in dowsing. This thread is for dowsers, skeptics can spread their negativity elsewhere. Please!!!

I'll admit up front that I am skeptical of dowsing and even more so when it comes to map dowsing. But when your best argument is basically "Go away kid. You bother me." you're not helping your own cause much.