My Dowsing Test

[Carl-NC]

Gee Carl....You are always say object do not emit anything. Now you say it is an electric field.

We've thoroughly discussed this before. Please don't pretend we haven't.

I will believe my sources and Bob plus my knowledge of how the unit performs.

So when Bob says, "All demonstrations we tried were perfect," you'll believe that over what you actually witnessed? Maybe this is what you guys refer to as "open-minded."

- Carl

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

Also, how do you dowse at 75 feet in a 25-foot deep river?

af1733....It is not easy. You take a 8 inch and a 10 inch gold Dredge and you pump material for about a month. By then you have a hole that is about 1/4 mile in length and 50 feet deep and have reached the bed rock where most of the gold will be found. You have survived the car size boulders that have rolled into the hole and the fun of hanging by your air hose in the fast water below when the water in front of these boulders has pushed you out of the hole. Just another day of work. Now you can use your Dowsing Rods to see where the hotest pay streak is or you could rely on the word of the water dowser who said the gold was interfering with his finding the spot to locate a well.....That's how it is done....Art

 

[ClonedSIM]

Also, how do you dowse at 75 feet in a 25-foot deep river?

af1733....It is not easy. You take a 8 inch and a 10 inch gold Dredge and you pump material for about a month. By then you have a hole that is about 1/4 mile in length and 50 feet deep and have reached the bed rock where most of the gold will be found. You have survived the car size boulders that have rolled into the hole and the fun of hanging by your air hose in the fast water below when the water in front of these boulders has pushed you out of the hole. Just another day of work. Now you can use your Dowsing Rods to see where the hotest pay streak is or you could rely on the word of the water dowser who said the gold was interfering with his finding the spot to locate a well.....That's how it is done....Art

So...you use 8 and 10 inch dredges to move 660,000 cubic feet of rocks and silt in one month? (I'm assuming a trench about 10 feet wide, so correct me if I'm wrong)

But, I thought you could dowse gold at depth? Why would you do all this manual labor when you could dowse the location first and just dig there?

 

[Jean310]

But, I thought you could dowse gold at depth? Why would you do all this manual labor when you could dowse the location first and just dig there?

Oh dear... let's not let logic enter into this.

Jean

 

[ClonedSIM]

But, I thought you could dowse gold at depth? Why would you do all this manual labor when you could dowse the location first and just dig there?

Oh dear... let's not let logic enter into this.

Jean

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

[af1733] author=]
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
SWR...My question about Dowsing underwater was not fair. Not a lot of divers have the experience of being 75 feet down in a river that has 25 feet of water. With 70 to 80 pounds of weigh you can walk around quite well. If you move around to much your suit heater will not keep you warm. The Dowsing rods will work underwater but the coin gets lost in the gravel.....Art
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Also, how do you dowse at 75 feet in a 25-foot deep river?
*****************
HI being picky eh? obviiusly a typo for which I myself am famous for. always read the intent of the statement.

(modfied to correct "Obviously")

Should I be silly also and call Carl for his typo on Doppler? He typed doggler, but I know what his intent was.

Tropical Tramp

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Oh dear... let's not let logic enter into this. Jean
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
swr Yeah...don't start with the logic again!
**************
I agree, we must keep swr in the loop.

Tropical Tramp

 

[aarthrj3811]

So...you use 8 and 10 inch dredges to move 660,000 cubic feet of rocks and silt in one month? (I'm assuming a trench about 10 feet wide, so correct me if I'm wrong)

But, I thought you could dowse gold at depth? Why would you do all this manual labor when you could dowse the location first and just dig there?

Sorry people, I did not intend to turn this into a mining forum. As you dig your hole the sides keep sliding into it. The sides of your hole is determined by the size of the river. Our hole was about 300 feet wide by about 1/4 mile. So digging to the gold target would still have the same size hole. There are times when the gravel will act like a wall (it has not been moved for millions of years) but this was not the case here. No I can't say that as there was areas of hard pack down there. Guess what af....The next spring mother nature had filled the hole back up. I don't know about af's numbers but a 8 inch dredge can move 12 yards of material an hour and I could not find any specs on a 10 inch as they have been regulated right out of the game. The trouble with the specs are that they don't take into account the time spent moving rocks by hand that will not fit in the noozle.

The fact that someone could Dowse underwater is true. The fact that I did this is just an after thought. This was long before I learned to Dowse. It would be nice if you could go straight to the gold but I never found a place where it was possible.

I though SWR would ask me questions about the weights used, dive times and the suit heaters....Art

 

[Carl-NC]

Should I be silly also and call Carl for his typo on Doppler? He typed doggler, but I know what his intent was.

I might be guilty of a typo, but not continual ignorance of someone's name. I typed "Dobbler", not "Doggler" or "Doppler"... what I meant was "Dobler," so yes, a typo. Why in the world would I want to type "Dobler" and not "Doppler?" Because that's his name. Look it up, and stop trying to be silly.

- Carl

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

=Carl-- Carl
*********
Not my device, that is mine. sorry. And thanks, for my being courteous to you carl, I should have expected no less. I will remember. Duh is it important? Does it prove something in science? If not then it is strictly being childish, looking for a straw.

Tropical Tramp

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

I must remember that being courteous to you is being silly by your own words sigh.

Tropical Tramp

 

[ClonedSIM]

[af1733] author=]
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
SWR...My question about Dowsing underwater was not fair. Not a lot of divers have the experience of being 75 feet down in a river that has 25 feet of water. With 70 to 80 pounds of weigh you can walk around quite well. If you move around to much your suit heater will not keep you warm. The Dowsing rods will work underwater but the coin gets lost in the gravel.....Art
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Also, how do you dowse at 75 feet in a 25-foot deep river?
*****************
HI being picky eh? obviiusly a typo for which I myself am famous for. always read the intent of the statement.

(modfied to correct "Obviously")

Tropical Tramp

Start reading the posts, Realde. Art defined what he said, and there was no typo involved.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

=af1733 SWR...My question about Dowsing underwater was not fair. Not a lot of divers have the experience of being 75 feet down in a river that has 25 feet of water. With 70 to 80 pounds of weigh you can walk around quite well. If you move around to much your suit heater will not keep you warm. The Dowsing rods will work underwater but the coin gets lost in the gravel.....Art
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Also, how do you dowse at 75 feet in a 25-foot deep river?
*****************
HI being picky eh? obviiusly a typo for which I myself am famous for. always read the intent of the statement.

(modified to correct "Obviously")

Tropical Tramp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Start reading the posts, Realde. Art defined what he said, and there was no typo involved.
**************
Agreed now, Also a smple point is that he was working at the bottom of a deep hole so while the river may have had 25 ft of water he was under 75 ft of water no? If you wish, we can get xu to figure this out.

Tropical Tramp

 

[ClonedSIM]

=af1733 SWR...My question about Dowsing underwater was not fair. Not a lot of divers have the experience of being 75 feet down in a river that has 25 feet of water. With 70 to 80 pounds of weigh you can walk around quite well. If you move around to much your suit heater will not keep you warm. The Dowsing rods will work underwater but the coin gets lost in the gravel.....Art
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Also, how do you dowse at 75 feet in a 25-foot deep river?
*****************
HI being picky eh? obviiusly a typo for which I myself am famous for. always read the intent of the statement.

(modified to correct "Obviously")

Tropical Tramp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Start reading the posts, Realde. Art defined what he said, and there was no typo involved.
**************
Agreed now, Also a smple point is that he was working at the bottom of a deep hole so while the river may have had 25 ft of water he was under 75 ft of water no? If you wish, we can get xu to figure this out.

Tropical Tramp

Who cares if he was in a hole or not? The point is that there was no typo involved. You attempted to cast some sort of dispersion on me for a statement I made when in fact my question was valid and had been expounded on long before you even attempted to make light of it.

 

[Carl-NC]

If not then it is strictly being childish, looking for a straw.

I wasn't out looking for a straw. Someone else was, and found out the straw he was grasping for was rooted in his own lack of knowledge.

I find it amusing that you guys continuously promote information from people whose names you can't even spell. Doppler? Getz? At least get the easy stuff right.

- Carl

 

[aarthrj3811]

Hey Carl....You have told us that you did not attend the demonstation in Nevada as you didn't get the signed contract back in time. Bob had stated on his web page that he didn't want your money. The Protocol of the test was copied here on T-Net weeks before the event. So I see no reason why you did not attend....Art

 

[Carl-NC]

Hey Carl....You have told us that you did not attend the demonstation in Nevada as you didn't get the signed contract back in time. Bob had stated on his web page that he didn't want your money. The Protocol of the test was copied here on T-Net weeks before the event. So I see no reason why you did not attend....Art

It didn't matter to me whether Bob wanted my money or not. He accepted my challenge for the money, I agreed to HIS test protocol, and I agreed to travel to the location of HIS choice at MY expense. My only requirement was a signed contract, to ensure that everything we agreed to was in writing.

Now, if Bob (or anyone else, for that matter) wants me to attend a "demonstration" that does not involve my challenge, then I agree, the contract would be unnecessary. But that wasn't what Bob agreed to. Even then, I'm not likely to travel long distances unless it does involve my challenge, or they are willing to pay my travel expenses.

Art, please respond as to whether you understand what I'm saying.

- Carl

 

[aarthrj3811]

Art, please respond as to whether you understand what I'm saying.

Carl....I understand what you are saying.....I also understand what I have read on other sites...Art

 

[ClonedSIM]

Art, please respond as to whether you understand what I'm saying.

Carl....I understand what you are saying.....I also understand what I have read on other sites...Art

I don't think you got it at all, Art. If you have information that directly contradicts Carl's post, then either post a link to the supposed sites or just nod and agree.

 

[Carl-NC]

Carl....I understand what you are saying.....I also understand what I have read on other sites...Art

So let's say you also read on that site that "all demonstrations we tried were perfect," whereas you witnessed something that was entirely contrary to this claim. Would you accept that statement over what you saw with your own eyes?

- Carl