Of course.. That is why it is just pointless. They must of dug all those holes in a couple of days and they pretend it is contemporary with everything they are doing ie digging up the road. This means they know that they find nothing and are just dragging that nothing out for 20 episodes. They are just re-drilling ground that has been drilled before. When the exact location of the money pit was unknown that was not by 100+ feet. They know where the old shafts are and they have drilled all the area around them. To imply anything else would be to suggest all previous search efforts (including the alleged finding of chappel vault) were hundreds of feet away from where the "real " pit is. The location of these earlier digs are known. So what are they digging for? The only answer is to spin out there show for as long as they can...
n2mini those earlier posts referred to source material that referenced the stone roads from years ago. Not just things "posters have claimed" Do you read any of the referenced material or just watch the show? I am sure that they are digging up bits of the road not previously been dug as earlier searchers were not interested in stone roads as they have no relationship to the pit. So why would anyone bother uncovering them. The Laginas are doing it because they have run out of other things to do. It is not because they have "discovered" hidden roads. These stone roads are referred to in numerous historic documents.
This should say Some parts of the stone roads have previousally been left uncovered. You do not need to uncover every bit of a road to know that a road existed... Why would anyone bother to uncover them?
Interesting. I hope somebody can find the origin of this painting. It certainly seems to show the feature they are calling the 'Eye of the Swamp'. And what are those lines through the woods supposed to be? Paths? Paved road?
It certainly looks like a lipstick case to me. I've found a couple old ones during my detecting and the size looks just right.
In the episode when they first noticed the "Templar Serpent Mound" (S8-Ep.9), remember the FIRST conjecture the archaeologist Aaron Taylor made? That the mound was very likely "spoils" from excavating - likely bulldozed by Nolan or Blankenship in the 70's. Spoils from the various previous excavations are likely spread throughout the island, including the swamp area, containing various bits and pieces of organic (hence, datable) material mixed in with the till - explaining the 100-year gap in dated similar objects found near each other. Maintaining a "pristine, natural/historical environment" on private property was not a major concern 50 years ago, and filling in a swamp with dirt and rock from digging a shaft (or several, or the same one repeatedly) was not a "bad idea at the time", and burying an old, unused cobbled road or pathway under several feet of fill would have seemed inconsequential...as probable (or more so) than any other explanation. Knowing the history of searches and digging on the island, it would not be unreasonable to assume that very little of the topsoil anywhere on the island is in its original location from the past 225 years - and stupid to assume that it is. Using a particular location for disposing spoils at different times, or from different locations would even explain some of the "stratification" of different soil layers.
How have you confirmed that this cave/tomb in Kentucky was that of King Arthur when there is NO credible documented evidence that King Arthur actually existed outside of legend and literature, or that Arthur was ever in Kentucky?... Today, I located the cave or tomb where King Arthur was kept during the Winter of 579AD in Kentucky. Yes in Kentucky...
According to Franklin, all the way down to Florida and out west to Arizona:So King Arthur is connected to oak island due to his using the space/time warp tunnel at the bottom of the money pit to bring 10’s of thousands of troops over to oak island in 562AD for a long hike down to Kentucky?
Question: Considering that there is no credible evidence that 6th century legendary King Arthur ever set foot in the United States, would this claim of finding King Arthur's tomb in Kentucky a TN Rule violation?... Today, I located the cave or tomb where King Arthur was kept during the Winter of 579AD in Kentucky. Yes in Kentucky...
Question: Considering that there is no credible evidence that 6th century legendary King Arthur ever set foot in the United States, would this claim of finding King Arthur's tomb in Kentucky a TN Rule violation?
Admiral Nelson was a real person with a real ocean going vessel in the 19th century, compared to a 6th century King Arthur of legend and NO ocean going ships, mush less 700 ships, existed in the 6th century that could cross the Atlantic.I would say technically "no." After all, the British brought back Admiral Nelson's body from Trafalgar (near Gibraltar) in a rum barrel. If there was a "King Arthur" he didn't have to be alive to be transported and buried. In fact the latter is usually the much preferred method. Less screaming, kicking and scratching.
Spoiler for this week's show:
They find an incredible stack of stones, possibly in the form of a cellar foundation right next to the stone path. A pub to provide beverages to the workers as they haul treasure up to the money pit? Or could it be Anthony Graves' house, where he hid the treasure he didn't spend?
Later they find that one branch of the path is heading toward the eye of the swamp. Gary finds an old caster wheel - just the thing to wheel items through a tunnel? (I think not because it's too small. It could only roll on a rail or wood floor).
In hole CD2.5 near the money pit, they continue finding wood!
The spoils of old shaft E5.25 are searched and fibers are found. And a small cannonball or grape shot. Could it be from the original depositors? Gary determines it to be blunderbuss ammo from the 16th and 17th century era.