What's new

Secrecy

Regardless of Ai answers.
LRL Dowsing devices use frequency lists, and generate frequencies, for Dowsers to Dowse.
Frequencies exist, frequency interference exists, so how is Dowsing not entangled in those facts?
 
Regardless of Ai answers.
LRL Dowsing devices use frequency lists, and generate frequencies, for Dowsers to Dowse.
Frequencies exist, frequency interference exists, so how is Dowsing not entangled in those facts?

Seems it's Ok for you to use AI to support your beliefs (actually it doesn't), but not OK for me to use it to dispel them. I see how that works.

Of course dowsing is "entangled in those facts." What you're glossing over is that the nature and effect of radio frequencies is regarded as factual, but the ability to dowse them is not.
 
Your telling a Dowser, the ability to Dowse frequencies isn't factual.
Playing devil's advocate or being a skeptic, which is it?
 
Your telling a Dowser, the ability to Dowse frequencies isn't factual.
Playing devil's advocate or being a skeptic, which is it?

Doubt (n): a feeling of uncertainty, disbelief, or a lack of conviction about something, wavering between belief and disbelief, or questioning the truth or probability of an event.
 
Regardless of Ai answers.
LRL Dowsing devices use frequency lists, and generate frequencies, for Dowsers to Dowse.
Frequencies exist, frequency interference exists, so how is Dowsing not entangled in those facts?

Oh it's entangled for sure.
It's just not efficiently entangled. And in certain cases is entangled for reasons corrupting disabusing known dowsing by false claims of L.R.L. dowsing.
Dowse is to plunge. Which underfoot is sober enough when seeing potential well site hits.
Divining distant treasures at horizons hue , not so much.
Or I'd be buying L.R.L.'s!


How many .L.R.L. recoveries are bannered here?
IF users didn't brag of success proven (not theorized or merely falsely claimed) , why wouldn't sellers?
"Ay there's the rub;"
Nothing is good without a good demonstration. Make that a confirmed factual demonstration that is consistently repeatable.
All else is in the P.T. Barnum realm.

Yes I knew a dowser that dowsed far more than water. Underfoot. Not yon geology and mysterious treasures never to be seen , let alone unearthed. Those are what he used a metal detector for.
With evidence existing even today.
 
Pay and ask something you believe, ask Grok if Radio frequencies can disrupt and cause interfearance with other radio Frequencies? They do!
Ask any Ai search, if Dowsing was real, can the Wi-Fi Frequencies cause Dowsing interference? Yes they do!
What happens when you ask Grok, "Does dowsing really work?"
 
You might as well ask AI “If fairies are real, can they have wings?”
I just had to...
Grok: "Yes, if fairies are real, they can absolutely have wings."
 
I just had to...
Grok: "Yes, if fairies are real, they can absolutely have wings."

... and the fossil record proves it:

Fossil Fairy.webp

Fairy-Tales.webp
 
If someone told me they rode Dinosaurs in a past life, and I didn't believe them, I wouldn't bother reading and commenting, just to impress other people..
Why skeptics live for Dowsing subject, and can't wait to comment, is it to impress people?
 
If someone told me they rode Dinosaurs in a past life, and I didn't believe them, I wouldn't bother reading and commenting, just to impress other people..
Why skeptics live for Dowsing subject, and can't wait to comment, is it to impress people?

What exactly are you suggesting horses evolved from?
 
No, but Ants and Bugs with antenna were the first dowsers..

Eohippus are one horse ancestor.

Woodcock bills are sensitive and used without eyes to probe and "feel" for prey.. But then a woodcocks brain is upside down from other birds brain positions.
Robins exaggerate the hop hop hop pause and feel and listen. Why the hop?
Woodpecker thumps repeatedly and pauses for the listen. For a disturbance caused reaction of prey ( by the thump) struggle to excite the senses.
Sonar on ship is pinged out and awaits a return signal should something be struck with the outgoing signal. Not all that far removed in crude theory from a metal detector coils business.

Fish have lateral lines. Some visible.
Filleting fish ; shows bones that go from those lines to the spine. I don't know the correct term , we call then pin bones on panfish. Not to be confused with ribs which also meet spine.
those lateral lines detect vibrations. And help interpret them. Fish don't starve in stained water.
Perhaps too it is in part how synchronized swimming of masses of small fish can be fluid.

Catfish whiskers?
I've put minnows in with tank captives and it isn't a sight hunt. Yes catfish can see.
But once prey is touched to confirm the very important prior scent work the grab reflex is triggered. A greater trust and therefore success that visual. It's a smell (?) mechanism in excess of the scent ability that brought the cats position towards prey area.
I put a small bass in the same tank and it bounced around the glass in a full panic without needing secondary (beyond scent) confirmation of predators existing in the tank.
Of course the panic/struggle excited the lateral lines of any lateral lines.
The minnows would group in the slight current created by the tank filter and hold there. Not exciting senses beyond scent. Did the filter current confuse lateral line sense detecting the slight prey movement holding multiple prey in position? It was unrelated to the bass signal regardless.

Observing the above tanks contents without eyes would have numerous conflicting signals.
Even of the stationary non living targets. By their existence one way or another.

Human biofeedback/auras/phantom pains following amputation which I'm personally familier with are impulses played in a loop.
Why? Because nerves can be described as the brain is constantly sending signals and expecting them to return as reply. And when no reply arrives the previous reply is substituted.
I can feel what does not exist. Because to my brain it exists. Being that it did exist prior.

The relative that dowsed followed buried fence. (Age covered ) . And counted burial graves.
That's underfoot still.
It's also direct.

The instant anyone declares long distance signal potential without a conduit of water (here we are at over half our bodies being water and sensitive to equipment thumping above the water table a half block away because,,,Water.. Isn't the same as ferreting what is between us and the equipment doing the thumping.
We're not trying to locate the equipment. And the water was already dowsed ) it becomes a reach in more ways than signal.
And air for signal mobility is fraught with peril. And E.M.I. and a host of other interference, wobbly inference , and modulation. Getting stepped on happens with equipment well designed and powered for stability strength.

Our grounding vs the heavy equipment. We both thump and feel a guess of water depth as a backhoe thumps another stump far above the water.
But what's above the wet stratus still yards below?
The right answer should begin with , it depends.
Here there's rocks scattered in sand that doesn't suggest rocks. But to the blind not touching them they are. There. About this big. Solid. Uniquely out of place because they are ..There. About this big that one. Solid so they're not sand. Or gravel. Or clay. Or water. Or wood.

One of the dogs dug up ten year buried gloves I didn't know existed.
I lost a buried skull.
I'd asked someone to mark with a coin after I buried it after trying to bury it multiple places.( Frozen ground. Too big of roots. Ect,)
I never recovered it.
I metal detected and found a coin with no recovery.
I detected known prior disturbed attempt spots. I probed with a heavy rod. Multiple times multiple years. A pine board was also just below the surface after I was done burying.)
No no one dug it up.
Multiple times I located the same very small spot in that area of the property I buried a small amount of paint powder.
Hmm. I didn't try an earth compacting vibrating machine.
Nor wires . Something about that area which is clear of interference disagrees with my locating more than paint dust.
I did wire claim where the waterline is out front but didn't dig it up to prove it. Don't recall if I chased the gas line.
Before a friend moved he had my chasing a pond pump wire. Too deep really for a detector but too shallow for code of 48 inches for frost line.
I recall the wire uncovered in a spot and think I avoided cutting it. Unlike elsewhere.
But similar to a copper line to a no longer visible fountain. Underfoot all.
 
Last edited:
Eohippus are one horse ancestor.

Woodcock bills are sensitive and used without eyes to probe and "feel" for prey.. But then a woodcocks brain is upside down from other birds brain positions.
Robins exaggerate the hop hop hop pause and feel and listen. Why the hop?
Woodpecker thumps repeatedly and pauses for the listen. For a disturbance caused reaction of prey ( by the thump) struggle to excite the senses.
Sonar on ship is pinged out and awaits a return signal should something be struck with the outgoing signal. Not all that far removed in crude theory from a metal detector coils business.

Fish have lateral lines. Some visible.
Filleting fish ; shows bones that go from those lines to the spine. I don't know the correct term , we call then pin bones on panfish. Not to be confused with ribs which also meet spine.
those lateral lines detect vibrations. And help interpret them. Fish don't starve in stained water.
Perhaps too it is in part how synchronized swimming of masses of small fish can be fluid.

Catfish whiskers?
I've put minnows in with tank captives and it isn't a sight hunt. Yes catfish can see.
But once prey is touched to confirm the very important prior scent work the grab reflex is triggered. A greater trust and therefore success that visual. It's a smell (?) mechanism in excess of the scent ability that brought the cats position towards prey area.
I put a small bass in the same tank and it bounced around the glass in a full panic without needing secondary (beyond scent) confirmation of predators existing in the tank.
Of course the panic/struggle excited the lateral lines of any lateral lines.
The minnows would group in the slight current created by the tank filter and hold there. Not exciting senses beyond scent. Did the filter current confuse lateral line sense detecting the slight prey movement holding multiple prey in position? It was unrelated to the bass signal regardless.

Observing the above tanks contents without eyes would have numerous conflicting signals.
Even of the stationary non living targets. By their existence one way or another.

Human biofeedback/auras/phantom pains following amputation which I'm personally familier with are impulses played in a loop.
Why? Because nerves can be described as the brain is constantly sending signals and expecting them to return as reply. And when no reply arrives the previous reply is substituted.
I can feel what does not exist. Because to my brain it exists. Being that it did exist prior.

The relative that dowsed followed buried fence. (Age covered ) . And counted burial graves.
That's underfoot still.
It's also direct.

The instant anyone declares long distance signal potential without a conduit of water (here we are at over half our bodies being water and sensitive to equipment thumping above the water table a half block away because,,,Water.. Isn't the same as ferreting what is between us and the equipment doing the thumping.
We're not trying to locate the equipment. And the water was already dowsed ) it becomes a reach in more ways than signal.
And air for signal mobility is fraught with peril. And E.M.I. and a host of other interference, wobbly inference , and modulation. Getting stepped on happens with equipment well designed and powered for stability strength.

Our grounding vs the heavy equipment. We both thump and feel a guess of water depth as a backhoe thumps another stump far above the water.
But what's above the wet stratus still yards below?
The right answer should begin with , it depends.
Here there's rocks scattered in sand that doesn't suggest rocks. But to the blind not touching them they are. There. About this big. Solid. Uniquely out of place because they are ..There. About this big that one. Solid so they're not sand. Or gravel. Or clay. Or water. Or wood.

One of the dogs dug up ten year buried gloves I didn't know existed.
I lost a buried skull.
I'd asked someone to mark with a coin after I buried it after trying to bury it multiple places.( Frozen ground. Too big of roots. Ect,)
I never recovered it.
I metal detected and found a coin with no recovery.
I detected known prior disturbed attempt spots. I probed with a heavy rod. Multiple times multiple years. A pine board was also just below the surface after I was done burying.)
No no one dug it up.
Multiple times I located the same very small spot in that area of the property I buried a small amount of paint powder.
Hmm. I didn't try an earth compacting vibrating machine.
Nor wires . Something about that area which is clear of interference disagrees with my locating more than paint dust.
I did wire claim where the waterline is out front but didn't dig it up to prove it. Don't recall if I chased the gas line.
Before a friend moved he had my chasing a pond pump wire. Too deep really for a detector but too shallow for code of 48 inches for frost line.
I recall the wire uncovered in a spot and think I avoided cutting it. Unlike elsewhere.
But similar to a copper line to a no longer visible fountain. Underfoot all.
Who reads all that?
If you want to continue Dowsing discussion with me, read my topic stuff, comment over there.
I've never Dowsed for bottle caps, tinfoil, and pennies. Why so upset at dowsers?
You can have the bragging rights, I don't care..
 
Last edited:
Who reads all that?
If you want to continue Dowsing discussion with me, read my topic stuff, comment over there.
I've never Dowsed for bottle caps, tinfoil, and pennies. Why so upset at dowsers?
You can have the bragging rights, I don't care..
You should. You might learn something.

Nah.
You don't read my writing , I won't read yours.

I'm upset at dowsers?
Heck no.
Just the fake dowsers making false claims.
In particular long range claims.
Oh sure such claims can be made here.
Don't claim long distance locating ability in front of me in person though ; or you'll be instructed to either leave or prove it.
( And I have buried targets to test on.)
Oddly, no one has proven such ability yet for some mysterious reason.
Doesn't mean I'm upset because someone deflects and pretends they have a critic. . I'm not the one defending a claim.
But boy howdy if I had a nickel for every alleged ability claim deflected when questioned.
 
You should. You might learn something.

Nah.
You don't read my writing , I won't read yours.

I'm upset at dowsers?
Heck no.
Just the fake dowsers making false claims.
In particular long range claims.
Oh sure such claims can be made here.
Don't claim long distance locating ability in front of me in person though ; or you'll be instructed to either leave or prove it.
( And I have buried targets to test on.)
Oddly, no one has proven such ability yet for some mysterious reason.
Doesn't mean I'm upset because someone deflects and pretends they have a critic. . I'm not the one defending a claim.
But boy howdy if I had a nickel for every alleged ability claim deflected when questioned.
All that for me!
Just because I said I was a Dowser that doesn't care what you think.
What are you arguing about?
You make no sense to me..
 
I remote map dowsed for a UK treasure hunter in an area where loose gold Celtic Iron age coins were found in years past. The hoard has not yet been found. But if he does after his ankle gets better that would be great. He detected a number of iron Celtic tribe finds. Here is a Lidar he made from my dowsed satellite image. Circular earthworks at the edge or close to the bog. From what I understand Celtic tribes had sacred bogs where they buried offerings (which can include jewelry).


pinpointed-LIDAR_1Cdarken_1.webp
 
I remote map dowsed for a UK treasure hunter in an area where loose gold Celtic Iron age coins were found in years past. The hoard has not yet been found. But if he does after his ankle gets better that would be great. He detected a number of iron Celtic tribe finds. Here is a Lidar he made from my dowsed satellite image. Circular earthworks at the edge or close to the bog. From what I understand Celtic tribes had sacred bogs where they buried offerings (which can include jewelry).


View attachment 2254042
More later, Lidar was used to check out hits on satellite image and I believe he has a pair of L-rods also.
 
Last edited:
All that for me!
Just because I said I was a Dowser that doesn't care what you think.
What are you arguing about?
You make no sense to me..
Now you're a dowser?
Do you have a certificate or something?
 
Anyone who can take a couple of bent rods, walk around and have them cross on anything, is also capable of doing the same thing on a map. Otherwise you have to believe there is some kind of "magnetism" or other physical reaction taking place. Clearly there isn't.

It's literally all happening in the central nervous system. Einstein was a smart mf.

“I know very well that many scientists consider dowsing as they do astrology, as a type of ancient superstition. According to my conviction this is, however, unjustified. The dowsing rod is a simple instrument which shows the uncanny reaction of the human nervous system to certain factors which are unknown to us at this time.” -Einstein

Those other factors he was talking about, which were unknown to us at that time:

QUANTUM PHYSICS​

Yet Eienstien has competition.
[The use of non-conventional material for the polarisers indicates that the radiation is not electromagnetic in nature and suggests a testable proposition that the radiation that causes the dowsing entanglement effect is one and the same as that which creates entanglement in quantum physics.KEYWORDS radiation, interferometer, polariser, fringes, entanglement, decoherence, quantum, dowsing.]

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom