Oakview2
Silver Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 2,807
- Reaction score
- 3,348
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Prather CA
- Detector(s) used
- Whites GMT
- Primary Interest:
- Other
in Sacramento?
Upvote
0
So Fowled... What you're saying is that the meeting was only "lip service" on the part of the forest service because they've already made up their minds and no matter what was said they wouldn't be changing their stand? That don't come as any surprise to me at all. All of these issues, be they frogs and toads, dredging, motorized mining etc are already stacked against us and it wouldn't matter if we showed them 100% pure science that proved them wrong. They'd still do what ever meets THEIR agenda.
I think it's time we filed suite against the entire forest service for failure to serve the public interest. Closing vast sections of PUBLIC lands so the people that own them (AKA John Q Public) can't use them goes against what the original intent of setting these areas up in the first place. It's high time that these "public service groups" like the center for biological diversity are charged with theft of public funds and forced to pay back every dime they've won in these law suites with interest.
YADAYADAYADA- same ol'dog and pony show at the circus. Seen it 1,000s a times blah blah blah and fu-John![]()
Dredgeman spoke to Craig Lindsay and he said there was only about people there.