What's new

Sure looks like a 40%er...

Coppercrazy

Bronze Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
324
Golden Thread
0
Location
Ohio
Don't get it, it looks like it has a silver edge, but it is a bicentennial half and isn't an s mint. Am I not seeing something hear? I rub the edge to see if I could see any copper underneath and I couldn't.
 
Upvote 0
probably a plating error? posting pics may help.
 
Photos
 

Attachments

  • image-2744615995.webp
    image-2744615995.webp
    22.7 KB · Views: 128
  • image-710902733.webp
    image-710902733.webp
    35.2 KB · Views: 111
  • image-2952954559.webp
    image-2952954559.webp
    60.4 KB · Views: 113
  • image-1495148182.webp
    image-1495148182.webp
    59.6 KB · Views: 119
I don't know if I'm just uhm. Seeing things, or what, but I can see the copper sandwich (hardly) but I can see it.
 
It might be dirt, because it is pretty dirty.
 
Because I looked and couldn't find the copper edge. So my question is. Is it worth more than 50c?
 
Yep, I posted about a '71 a while back. The edge looks just like yours. I performed the simple tissue test. Non-silver half side by side next to 40% suspect coin, covered by 1 ply tissue. If it's silver it will be a lot lighter in color than the non-silver. Plating normally does not make a coin more valuable.
 
I think it is played like everyone said. I want to hear the difference, but only sometimes I do. I must be imagining things.
 
I compared it to a clad and a 90%er because unfortunately I have no 40%er to compare it to.
 
Its clad, copper. It looks like the nickel layer overlapped on the edge. I have seen clad do this.
 
I pulled a 40% to compare it to, and it isn't silver.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom