What's new

Thick penny

rickertmork

Sr. Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2024
Messages
371
Reaction score
740
Golden Thread
0
The 1993 one is the thick one, i noticed this was pretty heavy and thick, I’m. It sure if the picture is good enough. Is this a known error?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7314.webp
    IMG_7314.webp
    909.9 KB · Views: 174
  • IMG_7313.webp
    IMG_7313.webp
    1.3 MB · Views: 118
  • IMG_7312.webp
    IMG_7312.webp
    1 MB · Views: 121
Upvote 6
Newer Condition .
Hasn't been in Circulation Long:dontknow:
 
Interesting about the "dryer penny". I've not hear of this before. I wonder how a disc would remain on its edge as it was tumbled in a dryer drum. I would expect it to be mostly flat against the drum.
The thick-edged penny seems about the same size as the other but has a thicker and wider edge.
 
Interesting about the "dryer penny". I've not hear of this before. I wonder how a disc would remain on its edge as it was tumbled in a dryer drum. I would expect it to be mostly flat against the drum.
The thick-edged penny seems about the same size as the other but has a thicker and wider edge.
Yes not a (dryer penny,) it would be in garbage condition if it was.
 
Could be struck on a thick planchet, it happens. It also could just have higher rims which sometimes happens due to striking pressure or die set-up. Weigh it on an accurate scale that weighs to at least two decimal points, if it's heavy then it's struck on a planchet cut from rolled thick stock. Neither issue is of collector interest unless substantially overweight.
 
Could be struck on a thick planchet, it happens. It also could just have higher rims which sometimes happens due to striking pressure or die set-up. Weigh it on an accurate scale that weighs to at least two decimal points, if it's heavy then it's struck on a planchet cut from rolled thick stock. Neither issue is of collector interest unless substantially overweight.
I will weigh it and get back eventually, the weight it was caused me to look at the rim.
 
Here it is compared to a nickel and another penny. The thick penny is on the middle.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7330.webp
    IMG_7330.webp
    140.7 KB · Views: 48
This is according to the compuda!

1993 Lincoln cent struck on a nickel planchet is a significant off-metal error. It would weigh 5.0 grams(standard nickel weight) rather than the standard 2.5 grams for a 1993 penny. These errors often show only a partial date or design due to size differences, and are worth significant premiums, typically hundreds of dollars. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Details on 1993 Error Coins:
  • Identification: A 1993 cent struck on a 5-cent planchet will have the silvery-grey color of nickel and a noticeably thicker, larger planchet.
  • Cause: This happens when a smaller penny planchet is mistakenly fed into a press meant for nickels, or vice versa.
  • Value: Similar off-metal or wrong-planchet, dual-denomination errors from this era often sell in the $100–$200+ range.
  • Other 1993 Errors: Other valuable 1993 errors include unplated, partial-copper cents (appearing silver) and Close AM varieties (proof dies used on business strikes). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Important Notes:
  • Many "silvery" pennies are actually damaged by acid, plated, or are simply missing their copper plating (zinc core), which is less valuable than being struck on a nickel planchet.
  • Ensure the coin has the correct weight (\(5.0g \pm\)) to confirm it is a true nickel planchet error. [1, 2, 3]
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
You can tell on the high points on the bust, and the edge , that it’s not a dyer coin.
 
Well you can check the weight for the "wrong planchet" theory, but it certainly does not appear to made of nickel.
 
As is often the case the internet AI response is wrong. It can't be struck on a nickel planchet because a nickel planchet is larger and would not fit in the cent coining chamber. A nickel struck on a cent planchet is possible because the cent planchet is smaller and would fit. The only way a larger planchet could be struck with smaller dies is if it was intentionally done without a collar but if this was the case there would be no raised rim around the coin and it would be larger in diameter than a nickel.
 
As is often the case the internet AI response is wrong. It can't be struck on a nickel planchet because a nickel planchet is larger and would not fit in the cent coining chamber. A nickel struck on a cent planchet is possible because the cent planchet is smaller and would fit. The only way a larger planchet could be struck with smaller dies is if it was intentionally done without a collar but if this was the case there would be no raised rim around the coin and it would be larger in diameter than a nickel.
So it’s a mystery? Here’s a picture of the other side. For entertainment
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7353.webp
    IMG_7353.webp
    879.5 KB · Views: 46
So it’s a mystery? Here’s a picture of the other side. For entertainment
Not really a mystery, as stated it's either a slightly thick planchet or just a raised rim from high striking pressure. If it's a little overweight then it's a thick planchet, if weight is normal then just a high rim. Both are pretty common occurrences.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom