Cubfan64
Silver Member
- Feb 13, 2006
- 2,994
- 2,818
- Detector(s) used
- Fisher CZ21, Teknetics T2 & Minelab Sovereign GT
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Oro - I'll give you what I believe to be BB's answers/theories to your questions - I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong.
Oroblanco said:Greetings friends,
Blindbowman made several statements here that raise more questions:
Blindbowman wrote:
it was Aztec , but was translated to old portuguese , found in the years 1279-1325 ,
How can we conclude the name Tayopa was translated to old Portuguese, when the Portuguese did not reach the Americas until circa 1500, when Pedro Alvares Cabral, swung too far westward while attempting to sail around Africa. I have not found any evidence to support an earlier Portuguese presence in America than 1500, two centuries after Deniz lived - a major timeline problem.
The evidence that the Portuguese reached the Americas far earlier is found on the stones themselves. Deniz' connection with navigational expertise as well as the Templars is further proof.
Blindbowman also wrote:
the language is old portuguese from the years of Deniz of portugal in the years of 1279-1325 ..
I respectfully disagree mi amigo, I see no reason to conclude the language is anything other than mid-twentieth century Spanglish. Have you considered that the stones might well be a mean fraud?
An extensive search on the internet turned up alot of information/proof that the language is indeed portugues from the years 1279-1325. I posted a HUGE treatise on this just yesterday, but then deleted it seconds later because you all just want to find the gold and not respect the history of it. As far as the stones being a fraud - impossible because the code has been broken by me and all the pieces of the puzzle fit together.
Blindbowman also wrote:
where is the AZtlan anyone . in my pocket, thats right ...
Hmm well there are a number of theories as to the true location of Aztlan, including a fairly sound one that Aztlan is one and the same with Atlantis! I hardly see Atlantis in the Superstition mountains of Arizona, much less in anyone's pocket - however....
This one eludes me - I'll leave it to BB to connect Atlantis to the Superstition Mts.
Blindbowman also wrote:
Deniz wanted copper and silver and was doing exploration inland from brazil in the years of 1279 -1300 when the templars vanished
I agree that king Deniz very probably wanted copper and silver, as well as gold and jewels and spices, but we have no evidence that Deniz had any knowledge of the Americas, much less had any ships exploring into Brazil. Do you know of any such evidence, if so I would appreciate if you could share it, as I have been working on a book for some eight years on ancient explorers, and have failed to find any evidence of Portuguese visiting the Americas prior to Cabral in 1500. There is evidence of Old World visitors prior to Columbus and Lief Eriksson, but nothing Portuguese....
Once again, the evidence is on the stones themselves - the old portuguese language from Deniz' time as well as the navigational hints and clues.
Blindbowman also wrote:
the code says pegleg was the one that change the wording in 1847
I respectfully disagree with this conclusion, and see no reason to think that Pegleg Smith, the successful kidnapper and horsethief, and source of one of the most famous lost mine legends in the whole southwest, had ever touched or even SEEN the so-called Peralta stone maps. I fear this is a very questionable leg of your theory mi amigo, and could be a false lead even if the stone maps are genuine.
BB found proof of a date that was changed specifically by PegLeg Smith who originally found the stones and tried to folllow the clues to riches. He was unable and as a result of his discouragement, he defaced the stones so that nobody else could follow them - BB himself however is the only person who has found the link and seen the true date on the stone that PegLeg tried to cover (despite the fact that BB has never physically investigated the stones themselves while many other people have and never noticed the "coverup").
You have a very interesting theory my friend Blindbowman, one that is going to take a lot of work to prove but if proven would result in the re-writing of many a history book. I wish you good luck and good hunting, and as always I hope you and everyone here find the treasures that you seek.
It IS an interesting theory and one where parts of it may even turn out to be correct - HOWEVER (and this is a huge however), to be 100% correct about such a plethora of (let's face it) outrageous links - from the Portuguese to Atlantis to the treasures from the Last Supper to the Templars - ALL INTERSECTING IN THE MOUNTAINS OF ARIZONA and identified by a couple stone tablets found is indeed a daunting assumption.
The truth is, the only way anyone will ever be convinced will be to "show me the money." I'll be right there alongside you Oro in tipping my hat to BB if we see a National Geographic special on his discoveries. Until that time however, I'll continue to have an open mind, but weigh everything with a hint of skepticism.
Good luck BB
your friend,
Roy ~ Oroblanco