sdcfia
Silver Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2014
- Messages
- 3,840
- Reaction score
- 9,709
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- SW New Mexico
- Primary Interest:
- Other
If one claims to be an expert at analyzing facts and evidence, I would then question them when they fall short of doing so when it comes to their own claims, even as they try to hold others to a different standard. The same thing would apply when they present their opinion and the hearsay they wish to focus upon as "factual evidence". Like I said, round and round we go.
Yup - a psychologist. Round and round, all right. Please ignore me and go about your business if this causes you angst. Or - add something to the conversation.













