johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
Here's my two cents chewed up by a lawnmower.... I have to disagree with the buckle theory and agree with John. It clearly was designed to stand upward depicting a potted plant.tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
4-H said:Here's my two cents chewed up by a lawnmower.... I have to disagree with the buckle theory and agree with John. It clearly was designed to stand upward depicting a potted plant.tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
AgreedCRUSADER said:4-H said:Here's my two cents chewed up by a lawnmower.... I have to disagree with the buckle theory and agree with John. It clearly was designed to stand upward depicting a potted plant.tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
It attached to Leather (I agree with SS probably horse related, but not necessarily)
It clearly makes sense, in it could have stood upright, but I know of many items which are up-side-down especially on horses. Although they are much older than this piece.
Some have suggested a buckle but at best it might be more closely linked to a strap-end (however never seen one with 3 lugs).
Obviously lies even though John Wayne walked kinda' funny. It didn't mean anything. Whew! I'm starting to sweat! I think it was some kind of in the house decoration for the girls to admire. MontyCRUSADER said:tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
I disagree. The end tab is bent out of shape & probably the reason it came of the leather, it used to be bent over like the other 2.
No what he said would indicate a mount, not buckle, hence the three mounting points. It obviously went on leather, but as Johnnyi said it might not be horse relatedtabdog said:CRUSADER said:tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
I disagree. The end tab is bent out of shape & probably the reason it came of the leather, it used to be bent over like the other 2.
It is obvious that it is bent.
What you said, would indicate a buckle.
Is that what you dissagree with?
HH,
Tabdog

tabdog said:CRUSADER said:tabdog said:johnnyi said:SS and Crusader, this might be one of those rare times I disagree with you a little bit....
I agree that it was probably mounted on leather, but it doesn't seem horse related.
It was found in Illinois, a state where the odds of a colonial type of object being found are much less.
Harness decoration of this shape usually point downward. If you tilt this on end point up, you find it looks an awful lot like a plant growing out of a pot. Assuming it is, it must have been point up, which also pretty much eliminates buckle also.
Other than adding that observation (which might be off base) , I don't know what it is.
It is deffinetly a buckle.
All belts were not wore sideways.
But, what sort of buckle is the question.
Happy Huntin,
Tabdog
I disagree. The end tab is bent out of shape & probably the reason it came of the leather, it used to be bent over like the other 2.
It is obvious that it is bent.
What you said, would indicate a buckle.
Is that what you disagree with?
HH,
Tabdog
Monty has a point. Im willing to consider house related. But I have no idea other than it looks as if it attached like a staple and I agree one end is bent out.Monty said:What kind of a weird cowboy or cowgirl would put a potted plant on his horse tack? There were no gay cowboys or cowgirls! Didn't you ever watch the oaters? Well, except for a couple of guys who went up on this mountain one time and.....you know the story.Obviously lies even though John Wayne walked kinda' funny. It didn't mean anything. Whew! I'm starting to sweat! I think it was some kind of in the house decoration for the girls to admire. Monty
house, farm, school?etrac007 said:a little west of chicago