Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

EE you posted -->Will you start promoting the eugenics program next? What will your motto
be then, "Kill the kids, it's better than treasure?"

Gross, dude!
********
yep, I agree, get rid of the eaters but keep the gorgeous broads for me. You can start the keeping with Uncorn and Judy.

Don Jose de La Mancha ( the Chaste saint, but willing to put up very weak fight to be convinced in dropping it)

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[EddieR]

Finally!

The LRL promoters have aquiesced to their devices being nothing more than dowsers.

I guess even the blind can eventually "see the light."

Maybe all those calculators showed them the errors of their ways!

Where did the "promoters" say that?

Why not tell another one while you are at it?

 

[EE THr]

ER---

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.

Pay attention.









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.
Pay attention.

Hey Eddie…He is a skeptic and he has the right to twist and spin everything….Art

 

[aarthrj3811]

ER---

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.

Pay attention.

Hey EE…He is a pseudoscience believer and he has the right to twist and spin everything.

Thank you again for confirming my observations..Art

 

[EE THr]

ER---

I'd like to see a dowsing rod catch a target over 20 miles away, or give you the size, the depth, the range.

And I'd like to see you do that same thing, with your LRL---in Carl's test!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

And I'd like to see you do that same thing, with your LRL---in Carl's test!

Will you be in one of the control groups (non dowser, non Lrl user, non treasure hunter) when and if anyone ever has a real double blind test?

 

[EE THr]

And I'd like to see you do that same thing, with your LRL---in Carl's test!

Will you be in one of the control groups (non dowser, non Lrl user, non treasure hunter) when and if anyone ever has a real double blind test?

artie---

Someone needs to tell you this. The "controls," in a test of this type is the "dummy" targets, not extra people. You will not be testing any Prozac there, artie.

How could participation by "non-dowsers," and so forth, possibly help you locate targets?

Wheeeeeeeeeeeyew! Ask a real Scientist, or sombody who knows what they are doing!

#22.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Someone needs to tell you this. The "controls," in a test of this type is the "dummy" targets, not extra people. You will not be testing any Prozac there, artie.

How could participation by "non-dowsers," and so forth, possibly help you locate targets?

Wheeeeeeeeeeeyew! Ask a real Scientist, or sombody who knows what they are doing!

Please give us the name of a real Scientist or someone who knows anything about how to run a double blind test?

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-double-blind-test.htm
A double blind test is a scientific test in which neither test subjects nor administrators know who is in the control group and who is in the experimental group. The intent is to create an unbiased test environment, ensuring that the results of the testing are accurate and will stand up to analysis by other members of the scientific community. The concept of a double blind test is an excellent example of the scientific method, since it aims to be entirely objective and potentially repeatable.

 

[EE THr]

Someone needs to tell you this. The "controls," in a test of this type is the "dummy" targets, not extra people. You will not be testing any Prozac there, artie.

How could participation by "non-dowsers," and so forth, possibly help you locate targets?

Wheeeeeeeeeeeyew! Ask a real Scientist, or sombody who knows what they are doing!

Please give us the name of a real Scientist or someone who knows anything about how to run a double blind test?

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-double-blind-test.htm
A double blind test is a scientific test in which neither test subjects nor administrators know who is in the control group and who is in the experimental group. The intent is to create an unbiased test environment, ensuring that the results of the testing are accurate and will stand up to analysis by other members of the scientific community. The concept of a double blind test is an excellent example of the scientific method, since it aims to be entirely objective and potentially repeatable.

Ask at a college of your choice.

Even a local community college will have people who know that.

Just ask for the Science Department.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

ER---

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.

Pay attention.









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

What's the matter? AFRAID to try it? AFRAID you might learn something? Or perhaps you just feel the instructions are just too difficult?

 

[EE THr]

ER---

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.

Pay attention.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

What's the matter? AFRAID to try it? AFRAID you might learn something? Or perhaps you just feel the instructions are just too difficult?

Have you let your 6 year old use your computer again?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EddieR]

ER---

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.

Pay attention.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

What's the matter? AFRAID to try it? AFRAID you might learn something? Or perhaps you just feel the instructions are just too difficult?

Have you let your 6 year old use your computer again?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I'm sorry. Were the questions too difficult?

 

[EE THr]

ER---

artie and the fenix brothers insisting that people do their dowsing experiment, in order to prove that LRLs work.

Pay attention.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

What's the matter? AFRAID to try it? AFRAID you might learn something? Or perhaps you just feel the instructions are just too difficult?

Have you let your 6 year old use your computer again?




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I'm sorry. Were the questions too difficult?

No, they were just too childish.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

ER---

A reminder of the topic, and the format defined in the original post.

Quit spamming this thread.

Put your dowsing junk somewhere else.

-------------

Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

Decide for yourself. Here are some things you should want to consider.

It should be noted that this topic neither contests nor advocates dowsing, itself. So any comments about dowsing will be considered strictly inappropriate, and will be reported as seriously off-topic.

----------------





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

A reminder of the topic, and the format defined in the original post.
Quit spamming this thread.
Put your dowsing junk somewhere else.

Good reminder..Topic started by EE THr. Name of topic.. Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Second sentence…It should be noted that this topic neither contests nor advocates dowsing, itself. So any comments about dowsing will be considered strictly inappropriate, and will be reported as seriously off-topic.

Great stuff.. so now you are saying that a discussion of the topic is off topic ?

 

[EE THr]

A reminder of the topic, and the format defined in the original post.
Quit spamming this thread.
Put your dowsing junk somewhere else.

Good reminder..Topic started by EE THr. Name of topic.. Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
Second sentence…It should be noted that this topic neither contests nor advocates dowsing, itself. So any comments about dowsing will be considered strictly inappropriate, and will be reported as seriously off-topic.

Great stuff.. so now you are saying that a discussion of the topic is off topic ?

Aren't you the guy who is always whining about reading comprehension?

The topic is about LRLs being greater than dowsing. Not about whether dowsing works, or whether someone can dowse, or what someone's idea of a good dowsing test is.

Get it now?

#39 again, artie.

You really should try to think before you type.



Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Did we answer the original question? I think so. LRLs= info and settings----Range--Depth----Size

Eddie; Did it seem like I was insisting or explaining? I guess I could be as confused as the others and not know it just like them.

I can't imagine someone insisting or demanding the taking of a "TEST". That would surely reflect badly on their stability.

However to present an experiment to enhance understanding must be as bad. Especially if it would give an idea of the real

difference between LRLs and dowsing. What was I thinking?


SHO-NUFF

 

[EddieR]

Did we answer the original question? I think so. LRLs= info and settings----Range--Depth----Size

Eddie; Did it seem like I was insisting or explaining? I guess I could be as confused as the others and not know it just like them.

I can't imagine someone insisting or demanding the taking of a "TEST". That would surely reflect badly on their stability.

However to present an experiment to enhance understanding must be as bad. Especially if it would give an idea of the real

difference between LRLs and dowsing. What was I thinking?


SHO-NUFF

They will never get it, fenix. Any type of reply to their posts they consider off topic....in other words, what they are saying is..." I can't think of a reply right now so I'll just say "stay on topic". Then their next post will be out in left field...off topic. Pseudo-skepticism to a "T".

 

[EE THr]

fenixes and ER---

If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

Oh boy, oh boy, I can hardly wait---where's my glue gun?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?