Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

[EddieR]

fenixes and ER---

If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

Oh boy, oh boy, I can hardly wait---where's my glue gun?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I have no idea if it will work.....but you can probably find your glue gun nearby. It seems the glue fumes are evidently pretty close to your computer.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

We will let you try it..please keep us informed about this experiment

 

[EE THr]

fenixes and ER---

If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

Oh boy, oh boy, I can hardly wait---where's my glue gun?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I have no idea if it will work.....but you can probably find your glue gun nearby. It seems the glue fumes are evidently pretty close to your computer.

If all you can do is insult, then maybe you are the one with all the mental problems that you keep trying to pawn off on others. I mean, how much savvy does it take to just post insults?

I started out here asking questions. I've never insulted someone first, only returned the favor.

If anyone went back and counted the legitimate questions, legitimate answers, and then the posts with nothing but insults, I think you would have a higher count of insults than me.

Can't you actually post something legitimate and on-topic?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

~EE~
If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?
We will let you try it..please keep us informed about this experiment

But, by your logic, you should be the one to build it, and then prove that it won't work!




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

But, by your logic, you should be the one to build it, and then prove that it won't work!
Why is it my responsibility to prove your statement?
~EE~
If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Afternoon EE etc., speaking of reading comprehension, it was posted -->The topic is about LRLs
being greater than dowsing. Not about whether dowsing works, or whether someone can dowse,
or what someone's idea of a good dowsing test is.
************
Err ah what was / is posted in the title was -> "Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing". In my 'risque tales
of old Paris' more in this case simply means 'does it consist of more than just dowsing', not is it better?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

It was posted -->hi my friend EE, I would personally tend to phrase it as a blending of the two.

To clarify this, may I suggest that the latest public data on a certain automobile states will hit
40 - 45 mpg yet go 150 mph. Of course it cannot do this without the human interface can it?

So would this be false advertising?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[fenixdigger]

You know the answers are getting in there when they go to Ludicrous. The answer is yes they are more.




SHO-NUFF

 

[EddieR]

fenixes and ER---

If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

Oh boy, oh boy, I can hardly wait---where's my glue gun?






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I have no idea if it will work.....but you can probably find your glue gun nearby. It seems the glue fumes are evidently pretty close to your computer.

If all you can do is insult, then maybe you are the one with all the mental problems that you keep trying to pawn off on others. I mean, how much savvy does it take to just post insults?

I started out here asking questions. I've never insulted someone first, only returned the favor.

If anyone went back and counted the legitimate questions, legitimate answers, and then the posts with nothing but insults, I think you would have a higher count of insults than me.

Can't you actually post something legitimate and on-topic?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

I just answered your question. If you took it as an insult, perhaps your mind was just expecting one, perhaps it feels as if an insult was deserved?

Nearly all of your posts are insults, you just try to word them vaguely. But anybody can see through them. And as a result...well....


Let's just say it's entertaining.

 

[fenixdigger]

At least you didn't say his posts were hateful and condescending or something like that.

 

[EE THr]

But, by your logic, you should be the one to build it, and then prove that it won't work!
Why is it my responsibility to prove your statement?
~EE~
If I hot-glue a wristwatch to a coathanger, can I get distance and depth, too?

I never said that you could get anything! Except a strange looking coathanger, maybe!




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Afternoon EE etc., speaking of reading comprehension, it was posted -->The topic is about LRLs
being greater than dowsing. Not about whether dowsing works, or whether someone can dowse,
or what someone's idea of a good dowsing test is.
************
Err ah what was / is posted in the title was -> "Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing". In my 'risque tales
of old Paris' more in this case simply means 'does it consist of more than just dowsing', not is it better?

Don Jose de La Mancha

I think the word "consist" could be construed as merely pertaining to the physical composition, while my title can encompass the claimed qualities, as well.

 

[EE THr]

It was posted -->hi my friend EE, I would personally tend to phrase it as a blending of the two.

To clarify this, may I suggest that the latest public data on a certain automobile states will hit
40 - 45 mpg yet go 150 mph. Of course it cannot do this without the human interface can it?

So would this be false advertising?

Don Jose de La Mancha

Never heard of remote control for cars?

If the same thing could be done with an LRL, somebody would be 25 Gs richer by now.

 

[EE THr]

You know the answers are getting in there when they go to Ludicrous. The answer is yes they are more.

SHO-NUFF

Can they reliably locate treasure?

The reason I ask, is because everyone has conceded that dowsing is not reliable.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Heh-heh.

You guys got nothing more than whining and whimpering?

Poor babies!



27. [*b.]This is where the CA tries to claim that they are the "victim," and you are just there to "disrupt the topic," even if it's your topic! They also try to claim that you are just a mean person, and that they are only there to "help people."





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Can they reliably locate treasure?

The reason I ask, is because everyone has conceded that dowsing is not reliable.

Who said that? I have said that my LRL can give me more information about the target than a set of dowsing Rods. I have also said that I can find every thing that I find with a LRL with a set of dowsing Rods. The LRL lets me decide which target I want to persue..Art

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI EE a refill posible I am becoming like the coffee hag. cream please but no sugar. Just thinking
of our gals in here makes my coffee sweet enough.

you posted -->Never heard of remote control for cars?
******************
Of course, I use them when flying for long distances also. But all of them require a human
interface to set them up and operate them ??

while you are thinking I will get the refills.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

HI EE a refill posible I am becoming like the coffee hag. cream please but no sugar. Just thinking
of our gals in here makes my coffee sweet enough.

you posted -->Never heard of remote control for cars?
******************
Of course, I use them when flying for long distances also. But all of them require a human
interface to set them up and operate them ??

while you are thinking I will get the refills.

Don Jose de La Mancha

It also requires a "human interface" to clamp an LRL in a vice, and prove that it won't follow gold.

But a car doesn't depend on nano bio-energy to run.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI coffee striker: you posted -->But a car doesn't depend on nano bio-energy to run.

******
Not basically I agree, but the human interface possibly does, as for the universe?

We might be shocked to see where the inital reaction / impulse starts from.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

What a deplorable lack of faith in human nature swr

Don Jose de La Mancha