Crow
Silver Member
- Jan 28, 2005
- 3,825
- 10,599
- Detector(s) used
- ONES THAT GO BEEP! :-)
- Primary Interest:
- Other
Hello All
The following story asks a lot of questions?
Legends of treasure abound throughout South America none so more than in Peru.
South of Lima in the desert just outside of Cañete, Peru there is a mountain called Cerro de Oro (Gold Hill). It is so named for the gold mine, which is still occasionally worked, though not commercially. Around the top, there are also some ruins of an ancient graveyard and skeletal human remains as far as you can see for yourself.They are not Inca but of the Warri people
They populated mid-southern coastal Peru from around 500 to 1000 AD which means these remains are likely over a thousand years old.
Ever since that time, grave robbers have looted the mountain, stealing the valuables from the graves and tossing the remains aside, leaving them scattered across the top of the mountain like some ancient battlefeild. Since the area is so dry, most of the bone fragments and pottery remain intact there some are even partially mummified bodies in cold dry air. To most of us it may seen sacrilegious that such sites we desecrated but to many average other than the elite of Peru it there is an indifference. Many locals through poverty saw whatever pottery or artifact as chance to put food on the table. This had and is being still done with many families working the old burial sites for generations.
The Peruvian government has cracked down on illegal artifact market. But corruption is rife and artifacts still filter into the foreign markets.The demand might of declined in the west but is rising economies such as Asia the demand for such artifacts are increasing pushing prices of such objects back up.
For any treasure hunter daring to risk prosectution or jail there is also an ethical delemia. Do we deem these sites off limits regardless they will be plundered anyway? Or create a market or a system like the UK potable antiquities scheme where the finder is rewarded for such finds by a independent panel at market value? Thus giving government and archeologists first chance at such artifacts?
Questions should be asked is an Archeologist more morally acceptable in digging up such artifacts or the urban region poor? The graves regardless are be subjected sacrilegious practices of desecration regardless . Weather its in a museum or some ones private collection via black market contraband?
Some sites indeed should be protected for all humanity as it is a glimpse into our common past. However some lesser sites others should be given the local population a choice in the fate of such sites.. It is all too easy for us to make ethical decision of behalf of the people whose ancestors it is. To me the fate of their ancestors remains and artifacts should be decided by the wishes of its descendants.
One final interesting question how would you feel seeing your ancestors or local cemetery dug up either for scientific purposes or by unethical greed?
Food for thought.
Crow
The following story asks a lot of questions?
Legends of treasure abound throughout South America none so more than in Peru.
South of Lima in the desert just outside of Cañete, Peru there is a mountain called Cerro de Oro (Gold Hill). It is so named for the gold mine, which is still occasionally worked, though not commercially. Around the top, there are also some ruins of an ancient graveyard and skeletal human remains as far as you can see for yourself.They are not Inca but of the Warri people
They populated mid-southern coastal Peru from around 500 to 1000 AD which means these remains are likely over a thousand years old.
Ever since that time, grave robbers have looted the mountain, stealing the valuables from the graves and tossing the remains aside, leaving them scattered across the top of the mountain like some ancient battlefeild. Since the area is so dry, most of the bone fragments and pottery remain intact there some are even partially mummified bodies in cold dry air. To most of us it may seen sacrilegious that such sites we desecrated but to many average other than the elite of Peru it there is an indifference. Many locals through poverty saw whatever pottery or artifact as chance to put food on the table. This had and is being still done with many families working the old burial sites for generations.
The Peruvian government has cracked down on illegal artifact market. But corruption is rife and artifacts still filter into the foreign markets.The demand might of declined in the west but is rising economies such as Asia the demand for such artifacts are increasing pushing prices of such objects back up.
For any treasure hunter daring to risk prosectution or jail there is also an ethical delemia. Do we deem these sites off limits regardless they will be plundered anyway? Or create a market or a system like the UK potable antiquities scheme where the finder is rewarded for such finds by a independent panel at market value? Thus giving government and archeologists first chance at such artifacts?
Questions should be asked is an Archeologist more morally acceptable in digging up such artifacts or the urban region poor? The graves regardless are be subjected sacrilegious practices of desecration regardless . Weather its in a museum or some ones private collection via black market contraband?
Some sites indeed should be protected for all humanity as it is a glimpse into our common past. However some lesser sites others should be given the local population a choice in the fate of such sites.. It is all too easy for us to make ethical decision of behalf of the people whose ancestors it is. To me the fate of their ancestors remains and artifacts should be decided by the wishes of its descendants.
One final interesting question how would you feel seeing your ancestors or local cemetery dug up either for scientific purposes or by unethical greed?
Food for thought.
Crow