Debunking AMRT

[geowizard]

Can it be true?

www.ccexplorations.com/

Every claim made today must pass the test of basic physics. Is it possible?

Does it pass the test? You be the judge! Let's check it out!

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Is this "New proprietary technology" feasible?

AMRT feasibility

Atomic Mineral Resonance Tomography (AMRT) is a proprietary, satellite-based remote sensing method marketed for subsurface mineral targeting. However, independent, rigorous peer-reviewed scientific validation or empirical testing published in mainstream academic geophysics or academic journals remains absent.

Lack of Independent Literature: Standard geophysical journals feature peer-reviewed work on established techniques like nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or atom probe tomography, but proprietary concepts like AMRT lack independent validation.

Scientific Status and Context

Lack of Independent Literature: Standard geophysical journals feature peer-reviewed work on established techniques like nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or atom probe tomography, but proprietary concepts like AMRT lack independent validation.

Commercial Promotion: Descriptions of AMRT performance derive primarily from corporate white papers, promotional newsletters, or industry marketing materials rather than double-blind academic scrutiny.

Mainstream Skepticism:

Mainstream geophysicists generally view space-based resonance methods that claim direct subsurface elemental identification with caution due to the severe attenuation and complexity of electromagnetic signals passing through crustal layers.

Related Validated Technologies

Atom Probe Tomography (APT): A destructive, high-resolution laboratory technique used in materials and planetary science to map small mineral samples atom by atom.

Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (SNMR): A ground-based geophysical tool backed by extensive academic research, though it is primarily sensitive to liquid water rather than deep mineral lattices.

Electromagnetic induction imaging with atomic magnetometers... application is severely restricted by the poor sensitivity of the sensing coil at low frequency.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Debunking of a concept in terms of technology and science has to be objective and without bias;

There is no bias intended in the determination of feasibility of technology or science. The technology and science speak for themselves. Either the science and technology exist or it does not.

The premise of measurement of NMR signals at distance has never been demonstrated.

NMR spectrometers operate in a laboratory environment. The sample under investigation is confined in a sample chamber with sensor(s) mounted in fixed position within less than 1 centimeter.

All of the imaging satellites in orbit around earth are accounted for. They are well documented. Imaging satellites are reflective imaging only. The exception is the International Space station. It only has imaging capabilities to within centimeters of the surface.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Satellites having NMR sensors;

Traditional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrometers cannot operate as remote sensors on orbiting satellites because NMR requires placing a sample inside a powerful, highly uniform magnetic field and applying localized radio-frequency pulses. Spacecraft instead use magnetometers or passive multispectral/hyperspectral radiometers to map magnetic fields or surface minerals.

Why NMR Fails in Space Remote Sensing

Weak Signal Strength: NMR signals generated by natural atomic nuclei are extremely weak and require close-range inductive coils surrounding a physical sample.

Lack of Local Control: Spacecraft cannot remotely project a stable, high-strength magnetic gradient down to Earth's surface to stimulate specific atomic nuclei on demand.

Distance and Noise: Ambient electromagnetic noise and vast orbital distances make detecting induced radio-frequency nuclear precession from space impossible.

What Satellites Use Instead

Magnetometers: Instruments like fluxgate and vector field magnetometers measure ambient planetary magnetic fields rather than atomic resonance.

Hyperspectral Imaging: Orbiters analyze reflected and emitted light spectra to identify surface minerals and chemical compositions.

Alternative Quantum Sensors: Emerging airborne or ground-based mobile NMR systems exist for localized prospecting, but they operate in direct contact or low altitude rather than from orbital space.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025326X19303029

Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications: A Review - PMC

Aerospace technologies are crucial for modern civilization; space-based infrastructure underpins weather forecasting, communications, terrestrial navigation and logistics, planetary observations, solar monitoring, and other indispensable ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

What satellites do nmr imaging?

I Googled "what satellites do NMR imaging?"

"No operational satellites perform Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) imaging or spectroscopy from space.

Why NMR From Space Is Not Feasible

Magnetic Field Requirements: Standard NMR and MRI require extremely strong, highly homogeneous magnetic fields (typically 1 to 14+ Tesla) generated by massive superconducting cryomagnets.

Weak Earth Field: Earth’s natural magnetic field is far too weak (~0.00005 Tesla) and variable to induce the atomic spin transitions required for controlled, high-resolution remote NMR from an orbiting spacecraft.

Signal-to-Noise Ratio: Radio frequency signals emitted by subsurface nuclei would dissipate completely over low-Earth or geostationary orbital distances, making detection impossible.

Claims and Alternative Contexts

Commercial Marketing Claims: Certain private ventures (such as CC Explorations with their promoted "Atomic Mineral Resonance Tomography" or Geo Resonance) claim to use satellite data combined with ground-based NMR principles or proprietary multi-spectral analysis to detect minerals or water from space. Mainstream geophysics and the broader scientific community classify these specific space-based NMR claims as pseudoscience or unproven remote sensing.

GeoResonance Geophysics Technology

GeoResonance has developed a unique portfolio of cutting-edge geophysical technologies for subsurface investigations of all types. Multispectral Satellite Remote Sensing reliably identifies hydrocarbon and mineral deposits. GeoResonance On-Site Survey accurately maps the deposits and determines...

georesonance.com

CC Explorations | Advanced Mineral Exploration Technology

CC Explorations provides advanced mineral exploration solutions using proprietary AMRT technology to identify subsurface mineral deposits with greater precision.

www.ccexplorations.com

Spectroscopy Terminology: In laboratory NMR spectroscopy, the term satellite peaks refers to small flanking doublet peaks caused by low-abundance active isotopes (like ¹³C or ²⁹Si) coupling with main atomic signals, which has nothing to do with outer space."

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Without supporting evidence to the contrary;

AMRT as described in the limited published record falls outside the limits of physics and available known space borne platforms.

The signals generated in nuclear magnetic resonance are too small in the magnetic field of earth.

The distance is too great. The signal if any is attenuated and below detection limits.

There are no satellites employing NMR on an orbiting platform.

NASA uses the ISS to perform limited spectral "reflective" imaging to depths of only a few millimeters.

The technology has no peer review or publication in any scientific journal.

Satellite imaging has limited pixel resolution and color resolution that limits spectral resolution.

The limited spectral and spatial resolution of imaging precludes analysis outside of carbon and hydrogen compounds. Spectral imaging of minerals and metals from space has never been demonstrated at any purported depth greater than a few millimeters.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

NASA Earth Data link;

https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/topics/solid-earth

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

The Data Catalog;

https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog?science_keywords_h[0][topic]=Solid%20Earth

"Measures deep into earth" There is no reference - only reference to Tectonic plate movement.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

A Catalog search on "NMR";

Earth Data Catalog:

(Notice latitude and longitudes)

https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog?science_keywords_h[0][topic]=Solid%20Earth

Filters
Topics

Temporal
Spatial

Showing 0 of 0 results

- Geowizard

 

[russau]

I'm to old to study this info anymore BUT for the younger people out there this info would be interesting to follow !

 

[geowizard]

Young and old alike marvel at the advances in technology!

Advances are unfortunately limited by the laws of physics! The application of NMR in this case has been shown to be outside the limits of physics. NASA is limited by the same rules that apply to everyone else! This deep dive into AMRT is intended to provide insight into the prevailing limits surrounding the concept of NMR. It is incumbent on everyone having an interest in science and technology to understand where the lines are drawn. Understanding the reasons for what is possible is one dimension in how we realistically view the world around us. There are things that are simply not possible.

The second dimension is going the greater distance to understand what is practical. There are many possibilities that in a capital system have no possibility of success. The cost of the system, if it is possible is not practical in terms of having economic or social value. The question of practicality does not come into the picture because of the lines drawn by physics.

Scientists involved in research are transparent out of necessity. Protection under Patent Law comes from disclosure. Acceptance in the scientific community comes through a process of demonstration of a concept, testing, repeatability and peer review. None of that is evident.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

In summary;

"Why it is debunked: Satellites use sensors to detect electromagnetic radiation (like infrared, radar, or optical data) from the very thin surface layer of the Earth. They cannot broadcast a signal from orbit that penetrates deep into solid rock, matches an "atomic resonance," and returns a precise 3D geometric map of gold or treasures buried deep underground. Legitimate geological surveys rely on physical, ground-based tools (like ground-penetrating radar, seismic imaging, or magnetometers) rather than orbit-based "frequency matching" for deep deposits."

- Geowizard

 

[robertk]

"Why it is debunked: Satellites use sensors to detect electromagnetic radiation (like infrared, radar, or optical data) from the very thin surface layer of the Earth. They cannot broadcast a signal from orbit that penetrates deep into solid rock, matches an "atomic resonance," and returns a precise 3D geometric map of gold or treasures buried deep underground. Legitimate geological surveys rely on physical, ground-based tools (like ground-penetrating radar, seismic imaging, or magnetometers) rather than orbit-based "frequency matching" for deep deposits."

Wouldn't that same reasoning apply to instruments flown around in aircraft?

 

[geowizard]

Double Inverse square power law of physics: (Physics 101)

(Print this out and carry it around in your hind pocket!)

Here's how it works:

"Signal strength is reduced by the square of the distance."

Inverse square law: Double the distance = One fourth the power.



The return trip is the same:

Send a signal out, wait for the return... The return signal suffers the same fate.

That DOUBLES the "Inverse Square Law!"

The rule above assumes the signal is in outer space (a vacuum).

Attenuation in the medium:

Radio waves are attenuated (made smaller) by the medium through which they pass.

Edited to add link to video.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Attenuation in the medium:

Geophysicists send electromagnetic waves from the surface into the earth using thousands of watts of power. Depending on the conductivity, the waves are made smaller. More conductivity consumes power from the waves and they travel shorter distance. The inverse square law still applies too!

Only by using powerful transmitters and very sensitive receivers are geophysicists able to measure more than a few hundred feet.

Find technical notes here:

Geonics Limited Publications

Geonics publications related to applications of electromagnetic instruments in geophysical studies (conductivity meters, time domain, metal detectors).

www.geonics.com

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Proprietary Software;

Software can become a cloak!

Software can extract data from other data. That's the process of statistical analysis.

Software cannot extract something from nothing. No signal, no signal processing. No data!

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Fuzzy data;

Scientists, Engineers and Geophysicists understand that remote sensing has limits. The closer we get to the limits of distance, remote signals get fuzzy. The signals become smaller than the noise. The noise prevails and makes the signal fuzzy. There are methods to reduce the effects of noise. The noise reduction, noise cancelling methods themselves have limits.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

Signal to Noise Ratio:

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is a measurement used in science and engineering to compare the level of a desired, meaningful signal to the level of unwanted background noise.

Signal-to-noise ratio - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

These topics are out in the light of the public!

Anyone with the ability to apply "critical thinking" skills can seek out truth!

- Geowizard