Dowsing.....I need to know.

[ClonedSIM]

I'm really glad to see Dell Winders has finally admitted there are no such things. It has been many years, but he's finally repenting.

Apparently, a case of mistaken quote identity. Dell

I'm curious, Dell. How is this photo proof of signal lines?

Well, I know Dell's here, so I'll try again.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[ClonedSIM]

You are asking for Proof? Sorry af1733, I have no reason to prove anything to you. Dell

Wow. Really, wow. Are all dowsers blind? I asked you how the photograph you posted below was proof of signal lines. I didn't ask you for proof. You apparently want us to think you posted it already, since your photo is labeled sigline2. I'm asking you how this is proof that signal lines exist. I'm asking what this is a photograph of, and why you were inclined to label it as such.

It's called Reading Comprehension...look into it.

 

[Jean310]

That's the same ole photoshop'd picture Dell has been posting for sometime now. His sigline1 picture is the exact same picture, photoshop'd differently. :::shrugs:::

:::sigh:::

Yes, that's the same old doctored photo he drags out and posts about every 6 months, whether or not it is relevant to the topic where he places it. It's obvious to the most casual observer that it's a product of Photoshop or Paintshop Pro, and a poor attempt at that. I've been reading some history on this guy, and all you have to do is recycle and rewind about every two weeks of his postings and when you examine them; they all look alike. He really needs to update himself from the mid-60s and get some new material.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

=af1733 Art No one is saying signals don't travel through the air or the ground, Art. Where was that written?
What has been questioned are signal lines, that is lines that travel out from a buried object directly to your dowsing rod. I think you're assuming signal lines are somehow like laser beams that shoot out all over the place, but that isn't the case
********************

In "general", all natural transmissionis are omni directional af.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Like Marks, I am a sceptic, but of a different kind. His scepticism is directed towards anything he regards as "paranormal", taking as normal that which lies within the limits of ---- "current" -- scientific understanding.

"My scepticism is directed towards the --------"assumption that we know enough to proclaim what is possible and what is not".

Tropical Tramp

 

[ClonedSIM]

Af1733, Who cares what you ask for, or whether you missed seeing where the photo has been posted before.

This forum does not evolve around your wishes, or demands. Dell

That's about what I figured, just wanted to hear it from Dell. I actually like the fact that Dell thinks he does not have to explain himself on a public forum. It means we can draw any assumptions we want and he can't do a thing about it.

Dell,
You drew a line on a picture of some land and called it a signal line. You've never seen a signal line and have no knowledge of their existence. The only thought you have is of dollar signs running around your head if you can convince some gullible individual that they are real and sell them a machine that is supposed to detect these figments of your imagination. You focus on people less intelligent than yourself (they actually do exist!) and attempt to convince them that you posses massive amounts of knowledge, all of which fly in the face of rational thinking and education, and since these people cannot differentiate between fact and fiction, they believe you, since they all cling to the hope that they can get rich without any effort.

I don't expect you to respond to any of this, since you don't have to explain yourself, but I'd expect you to say something to save face in front of your valued constituency.

And, can I say how much easier this site has been able to read since I ignored Realde? I should have done this weeks ago!

 

[Jean310]

Af1733, Who cares what you ask for, or whether you missed seeing where the photo has been posted before.

This forum does not evolve around your wishes, or demands. Dell

That's about what I figured, just wanted to hear it from Dell. I actually like the fact that Dell thinks he does not have to explain himself on a public forum. It means we can draw any assumptions we want and he can't do a thing about it.

Dell,
You drew a line on a picture of some land and called it a signal line. You've never seen a signal line and have no knowledge of their existence. The only thought you have is of dollar signs running around your head if you can convince some gullible individual that they are real and sell them a machine that is supposed to detect these figments of your imagination. You focus on people less intelligent than yourself (they actually do exist!) and attempt to convince them that you posses massive amounts of knowledge, all of which fly in the face of rational thinking and education, and since these people cannot differentiate between fact and fiction, they believe you, since they all cling to the hope that they can get rich without any effort.

I don't expect you to respond to any of this, since you don't have to explain yourself, but I'd expect you to say something to save face in front of your valued constituency.

And, can I say how much easier this site has been able to read since I ignored Realde? I should have done this weeks ago!

KAAAAA POWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

FTW!

 

[ClonedSIM]

Now, Dell. Would you care to tell us what your photograph supposedly shows?

 

[ClonedSIM]

Another question, Dell. With all the posts you are copying and pasting over to your website, don't you think you should request permission to reprint the material?

I mean, you're taking other people's words and copying them without even providing proper author credit, in addition to the fact that you only reproduce what you want to see on your site, as opposed to the whole story.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

[=af1733
I asked you how the photograph you posted below was "proof" of signal lines. I didn't ask you for "proof".

It's called Reading Comprehension...look into it.
**************
Yeah hehehehehehe snicker. proof & proof
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Like Marks, I am a sceptic, but of a different kind. His scepticism is directed towards anything he regards as "paranormal", taking as normal that which lies within the limits of ---- "current" -- scientific understanding.

"My scepticism is directed towards the --------"assumption that we know enough to proclaim what is possible and what is not".

Tropical Tramp

 

[Jean310]

Another question, Dell. With all the posts you are copying and pasting over to your website, don't you think you should request permission to reprint the material?

I mean, you're taking other people's words and copying them without even providing proper author credit, in addition to the fact that you only reproduce what you want to see on your site, as opposed to the whole story.

Should we have expected anything else? When your life's work revolves around marketing something that you've admitted on a public forum "does nothing" --utilizing tactics of a highly questionable nature is his MO (and always will be).

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI some one asked me, why do I post when none of the sceptics can / will answer my questions. It is really simple. I am not posting for them, but for the benefit of the hundreds of visitors to these sites Many have em'd me to ask "are these guys real"? Why are they so self centered and make such self aggrandizing remarks while running down anyone else, even for grammer, which has nothing to do with intelligence, or the subject at hand, just lack of a formal education.? I merely tell them to just watch their posts which are actually silly, and self revealing. even go so far as to post many no's as presumed evidence of their superior intelligence, of course most are simply copied out of a text. the proof of the pudding. Actually most of their posts are self defeating.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Art try http//'en.wikipedia.org type in "misuse and using false data in computing statistics". There areover 3015 pages

Like Marks, I am a sceptic, but of a different kind. His scepticism is directed towards anything he regards as "paranormal", taking as normal that which lies within the limits of ---- "current" -- scientific understanding.

"My scepticism is directed towards the --------"assumption that we know enough to proclaim what is possible and what is not".

Tropical Tramp

 

[ClonedSIM]

Another question, Dell. With all the posts you are copying and pasting over to your website, don't you think you should request permission to reprint the material?

I mean, you're taking other people's words and copying them without even providing proper author credit, in addition to the fact that you only reproduce what you want to see on your site, as opposed to the whole story.

Should we have expected anything else? When your life's work revolves around marketing something that you've admitted on a public forum "does nothing" --utilizing tactics of a highly questionable nature is his MO (and always will be).

I'm not really expecting him answering the question, to be honest. In fact, he's probably back at his site adding credits to all the posts he copied over there.