Tom_in_CA
Gold Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Messages
- 13,803
- Reaction score
- 10,339
- Golden Thread
- 2
- Location
- Salinas, CA
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 2
- Detector(s) used
- Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
That's perfectly fine if it didn't work for you.
Doesn't mean that it doesn't work for others.......
The same logic works to make any other TH'ing method equally valid, right ? Nothing can EVER be said to be absurd, illogical, un-scientifically workable, etc..... That's why my tennis shoe method is totally outside the realm of critical analysis. It's to be given total credibility. And even if someone tries it, and it didn't work, that doesn't mean it's not still totally legitimate. That only means "it didn't work for you".
Kind of like this: I can say that zebras fly if you toss them off the empire state building. And you can toss 100 zebras, and they all fall to the ground. I can just say "they chose not to fly this day". Or "I guess your zebras just didn't have the gift" . Or "durned that south wind last Thursday anyhow". You see how at no point are you ever allowed to conclude that zebras can't fly? You just haven't seen it personally. And you aren't pitching them off the roof with the right angle and spin, etc.... Hence you have to give full credibility to the possibility of zebra flight, right ?
This is how some people can view the notion of a coat-hanger pointing to gold an acre (or a mile or whatever ) away.