What's new

Dowsing now

You got it wrong in assuming when my rods crossed, I said: "Yep, there it is", then moved on without somehow verifying a target actually existed. Not so. It was my metal detector I scanned the spot with afterwards to verify that said: "Yep, there it is".

I stopped digging as I got a very sore back from digging up so many targets. I also tracked my dowsing accuracy which came up with my rods crossing over targets, on average, within 18" from rod x (ground zero). For you to assume I did not verify, makes an ass/u/me.

So, go ahead, limit yourself to such stipulations, limitations, and requirements as needing the position of the stars to be right, planetary alignment to be straight, solar flares or the lack thereof and the like if you want for you to be able to dowse. But rest assured such stuff is nothing but witchcraft and voodoo, and thus gives dowsing a bad name and image.

So what's next? Maybe what signal line said he read one time that webbed toes are a must have to dowse? If you don't have such toes right now, you can get them by smashing them with a hammer.
Going through old emails, I just noticed your reply. You said you stopped digging because of your back, but verified with a metal detector (problem: interpretation of metal detector responses can be wrong; the only real verification of a target is to remove it from the ground, so no, you have not verified the target, if you did not finish digging it). I have dug all of my targets (that is how I learned about "false targets" or "magnetic image" (and what material they are composed of), which are an exact copy of the real target, but in the wrong location, and I discovered how to instantly replicate a "false target", instead of waiting years for the target to age in the ground, which is one step closer to solving the problem). Concerning dowsing shutting down, there are basically two ways for this to happen: 1) exhausting whatever energy is required, 2) being a partial Levite. When we were in Greece, they called my predecessor one of the greatest dowsers in the world, because he could pinpoint a target (known only to them) to the very inch from several miles away. In his 80's he could dowse with an L-Rod non-stop for about a couple of hours, because his method gave faster, stronger, responses, but wasted more energy (then he would have to wait until the next day to regain the ability), but when he was almost 90 years old, he could only dowse for about 10 minutes before shutting down, so dowsing is obviously dependent on some vital energy, which must be restored over time. He was what I call a "Full Levite", having both the Levitical Y-DNA and X-DNA (so hypothetically, when one chromosome trait shuts down, the other one takes over, resulting in a consistent operation). If you never notice your dowsing shutting down, then it probably indicates you have both chromosomes (from your father and mother) and use a more energy conservative method. I only have the Levitical X-DNA, so my dowsing ability fluctuates over periods of time. Each kind of dowsing device has a limited motion (for example: some move up or down, some move sideways, and bobbers can move any direction depending on how you hold it, so it is the most versatile). If the energy moving the dowsing device changes to a direction that the device cannot move, then it will stop. Also, if you place a pendulum against a wall: on one side it will bounce, and on the other side it will stop, which proves the energy is either pulling or pushing, but not both at the same time.
 
Going through old emails, I just noticed your reply. You said you stopped digging because of your back, but verified with a metal detector (problem: interpretation of metal detector responses can be wrong; the only real verification of a target is to remove it from the ground, so no, you have not verified the target, if you did not finish digging it). I have dug all of my targets (that is how I learned about "false targets" or "magnetic image" (and what material they are composed of), which are an exact copy of the real target, but in the wrong location, and I discovered how to instantly replicate a "false target", instead of waiting years for the target to age in the ground, which is one step closer to solving the problem). Concerning dowsing shutting down, there are basically two ways for this to happen: 1) exhausting whatever energy is required, 2) being a partial Levite. When we were in Greece, they called my predecessor one of the greatest dowsers in the world, because he could pinpoint a target (known only to them) to the very inch from several miles away. In his 80's he could dowse with an L-Rod non-stop for about a couple of hours, because his method gave faster, stronger, responses, but wasted more energy (then he would have to wait until the next day to regain the ability), but when he was almost 90 years old, he could only dowse for about 10 minutes before shutting down, so dowsing is obviously dependent on some vital energy, which must be restored over time. He was what I call a "Full Levite", having both the Levitical Y-DNA and X-DNA (so hypothetically, when one chromosome trait shuts down, the other one takes over, resulting in a consistent operation). If you never notice your dowsing shutting down, then it probably indicates you have both chromosomes (from your father and mother) and use a more energy conservative method. I only have the Levitical X-DNA, so my dowsing ability fluctuates over periods of time. Each kind of dowsing device has a limited motion (for example: some move up or down, some move sideways, and bobbers can move any direction depending on how you hold it, so it is the most versatile). If the energy moving the dowsing device changes to a direction that the device cannot move, then it will stop. Also, if you place a pendulum against a wall: on one side it will bounce, and on the other side it will stop, which proves the energy is either pulling or pushing, but not both at the same time.
I have some of his old emails also. As a map dowser in this forum, it was needed to keep folders to save dowsing emals as PROOF of what really happened.
 
That's exactly what keeps happening to me.
I was just about to post about how it's like I'm Dowsing all my Chi energy out when conjoining with the Dowsable anomaly.
It's like I'm running my Dowsing battery down, and when I put it, Dowsing away for a Month, the signal/Dowsing returns.
In 3 to 4 days it's gotten terrible again.
It gives me the idea to put them away, then after a while, go to Arkansas, Dowse some diamonds, before I run my juice out.
Interesting!
It leads me away from frequency contamination at the point of resonation.
So my Dna has me doomed..
But that doesn't explain everyone else, that can't even start Dowsing, it used to be many members could L-rod dowse everyone was posting on here. Not any more. If they lost their power, what about beginners?
It's like saying I can teach someone to Dowse full power, like I did at the begining, but I can't participate, doesn't make sense, like normal..
Everything in the universe has a frequency, which can be used to detect, match, and locate anything using dowsing, and there are several kinds of frequencies (electrical, magnetic, mechanical, etc). These frequencies can be induced into a dowsing device, instead of using a sample. You can grind a tuning fork down to a specific frequency, which could then be put on a string and used as a source of mechanical resonance (however, it may be susceptible to changes in temperature). You can derive the frequency for any compound by taking it's chemical formula and "averaging" every element (i.e., H2O has 2 Hydrogens and 1 Oxygen, so add all NMRs and divide by 3). For water, you can also use the frequency on the back of a Microwave oven, which is molecular resonance. The problem with using NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) frequencies is you have to adjust the frequency for the local magnetic field (so it is better to use the "gamma" to adjust the frequency to be proportional to the magnetic field). I assume that electrical frequencies that are unaffected by changes in magnetic field (by time or location) are apparently electrical resonance. The two main false assumptions about dowsing are: 1) that no one can do it, 2) that anyone can do it. The truth is only certain people can dowse, not necessarily all the time. I spent many years trying to narrow down why certain people could dowse and why others apparently could not, because at the time I could not get it to work. But then I remembered having dowser responses earlier in life, before I knew what to call it, which hints at epochs of ability and inability, at least for my body type. So far, the ability to dowse seems to be based on Levitical DNA, being right or left handed (magnetically), and maybe which 10 day cycle you were born on (i.e., 10 Heavenly Stems, acupuncture). My predecessor was "magnetically" right handed, and I was "magnetically" left handed (even though I grew up thinking I was right handed, but my mother said I started out left handed and switched on my own). By holding my breath, I found I could switch my handedness to that like my predecessor, which effected whether I detected the "false target" (magnetic image near by) or the "real target". We have been in a "Solar Maximum" for the last several years, which is probably effecting many dowsers, because there is an increase in sun spots that cause AM radio blackouts. Those dowsers which seem to work all the time probably have a better chromosome combination than others. Sometimes clothing may include a blocker, which inverses the signal, nullifying it. Other factors could be how you breath, posture, which direction you are facing. I suspect that Square Dancing's "Dosey Doe" comes from Portuguese dowsers disguising their technique as dance (it is a peculiar movement with two people circling each other only facing one direction, which would enable both to maintain their magnetic orientations).
 
You can derive the frequency for any compound by taking it's chemical formula and "averaging" every element (i.e., H2O has 2 Hydrogens and 1 Oxygen, so add all NMRs and divide by 3).
Yeah, no. Not even close.
 
Your post here throws tons of negative and useless restrictive obstacles in the way of those who would subscribe to your claims. I for one don't and never will.

As for me, by not subscribing to issues, things, and requirements to measure up to be a successful dowser you list in your post, I have never not been able to dowse.
You called it, a lot of posts saying dowsing is impossible and dowsing cannot be proven on here by "actual" dowsers.
Its dissuasion and disinformation from different angles so people wont bend some rods and do actual dowsing, and see for themselves
what is happening.
 
If a Dowser went to Arkansas diamond mine, we're "Dowsing is allowed", and Dowsed up multiple diamonds, and they change the rules to "no Dowsing allowed", and banned Dowsing there, it would be proof enough for most!

Exactly, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

The "scientists" say insect pudding dishes are healthy yummy replacements, so they are conditioning humans through the media to accept it and repeat "yummy yums".

The same situation happens when the BBC and New York Times declares the dowsing pudding to be rotten and scammy, because they did the tasting of this pudding with the scientists, readers are advised to never bake the dowsing pudding and judge it for themselves. Do as you are told and you will be happy they say.

If you get un-opinionated new people to do some first time dowsing, the pudding is quite nice for them and they like it.

If you are a dowser, but you give people excuses not to bake some dowsing puddings, because of frequencies or solar cycles, who are you helping then??
 
I'm helping those that read.
If I didn't post, people couldn't read them..
 
Last edited:
Yeah, no. Not even close.
No, Carl. The method that I described for calculating any chemical formula works. I have done it for several chemicals, and it has always worked. But you have to adjust the NMR for the earth's weak local magnetic field strength. Keep in mind, that magnetic fields vary from place to place and on a daily basis. For example:

Water = H2O (at 50,203.1 nT)
Hydrogen = 2136.30212765957 Hz
Oxygen = 289.703931531915 Hz
(2 * 2136.30212765957) + 289.703931531915 = 4562.308186851055
4562.308186851055 / 3 = 1520.7693956170183333333333333333
1520.77 / 2 = 760.385 Hz (harmonic)
 
In order for me to successfully Dowse, I need increased Sun Energy. Weather it's from a Corona hole increasing Solar wind, or a Sunspot group increasing flux, or best yet, the Sun shooting off Solar flares. A blank Sun during Solar minimum, dosen't help Dowsing.
We are between a roughly 11 year Solar cycle. Cycle 24 heading into 25. If we look on Spaceweather.com and count the spotless days, listed front page left side, we are now at 586 spotless days. Between the last Solar minimum 23/24, we had a total of 801 spotless days. It could be another 215 days before it only begins to wake up. Hopefully it wakes up soon and Cycle 25 gets under way. This is what I have to be patient for. It will come Cycle 25. Dowser
Concerning Dowsing and Solar Cycles, personally, I have noticed an increase in my dowsing ability at Solar Minimum and decrease at Solar Maximum, which is the exact opposite of what you are experiencing, so we are electrically or magnetically opposites, as far as, dowser body types (which makes us complementary). Keep in mind, there are other Geological and Astronomical factors involved (such as Equinoxes, Solstices, Conjunctions, and Magnetic Drift). The dowser's body is a component of the dowsing device, which apparently varies in electrical tolerances from person to person. The only way to solve this is to collect information from all dowsers, noting possible factors such as location, time, birth date, left or right handedness, DNA, etc. Because I have already made a correlation between dowsing and Levitical DNA, I have established various surnames that are potential dowsers (for example: Williams, Johnson, Mullins, Jones, Smith, etc), and when asked, they normally have a relative, such as an uncle, that can dowse. Out of a few functioning dowsers that I questioned, I was the only one that noticed a difference in my dowsing during the 2 minute and 31 second Totality of the Solar Eclipse in 2017 (I went from not being able to dowse, to the most powerful reaction that I have ever experienced, which disappeared again immediately after totality, what my predecessor would call a "Fort Knox Whip" with my single L-Rod, which was swinging so hard that it was bouncing off my body).
 
Last edited:
No, Carl. The method that I described for calculating any chemical formula works. I have done it for several chemicals, and it has always worked. But you have to adjust the NMR for the earth's weak local magnetic field strength. Keep in mind, that magnetic fields vary from place to place and on a daily basis. For example:

Water = H2O (at 50,203.1 nT)
Hydrogen = 2136.30212765957 Hz
Oxygen = 289.703931531915 Hz
(2 * 2136.30212765957) + 289.703931531915 = 4562.308186851055
4562.308186851055 / 3 = 1520.7693956170183333333333333333
1520.77 / 2 = 760.385 Hz (harmonic)
Can you cite any scientific reference that supports this? Because this is not how NMR works, not at all.

Follow-up question: If I were to build a proton-precession magnetometer using water as the precession agent (which I have done), in a 50.2uT field would it precess at 2136 Hz, 290 Hz, 4562 Hz, 1521 Hz, or 760 Hz?
 
Last edited:
Can you cite any scientific reference that supports this? Because this is not how NMR works, not at all.

Follow-up question: If I were to build a proton-precession magnetometer using water as the precession agent (which I have done), in a 50.2uT field would it precess at 2136 Hz, 290 Hz, 4562 Hz, 1521 Hz, or 760 Hz?

Larmor Frequency = gyromagnetic ratio x magnetic field strength

Using the MHz/T chart on this website (converting MHz to Hz and 50,000 nT to Tesla):

Oxygen = -5.772 MHz/T (disregarding polarity)
5,772,000 Hz * .00005 T = 288.6 Hz (EFNMR or Earth's Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) frequency

Hydrogen = 42.577478461 MHz/T
42,577,478.461 Hz * .00005 T = 2128.87392305 Hz (EFNMR) frequency

I discovered that a molecular frequency for H2O can be found by adding every occurrence of every element and diving by the total number of elements.

2128.87392305 + 2128.87392305 + 288.6 = 4546.3478461
4546.3478461 / 3 = 1515.4492820333333333333333333333 Hz (at 50,000 nT)

However, it is more convenient to use what might be called the "EFNMR Ratio":
1515.4492820333333333333333333333 Hz / 50000 nT = 0.03030898564066666666666666666667

So by simply multiplying any local earth magnetic field (nT) with ratio 0.03030898564066666666666666666667,
you get the frequency (Hz) for H2O for that time and location.

Concerning proton magnetometers, I have a broken one, which uses hydro-carbons (i.e., lighter fluid), because it is considered better than water. I have not done the calculations or tests, but I assume you could precess the element hydrogen or the molecule water and their harmonics (I only used water as an example, because it is a simple compound and not proprietary). An interesting question would be: do elements have harmonics of each other; can they be confused? BTW, the easiest way to calculate harmonic frequencies for dowsing is to move the decimal point, which is a multiple or division by 10 (since with Eloptic Energy, there is no attenuation).
 
Last edited:
I discovered that a molecular frequency for H2O can be found by adding every occurrence of every element and diving by the total number of elements.
"I discovered?" Again: Can you cite any scientific reference that supports this? Because this is not how NMR works, not at all.

Concerning proton magnetometers, I have a broken one, which uses hydro-carbons (i.e., lighter fluid), because it is considered better than water. I have not done the calculations or tests, but I assume you could precess the element hydrogen or the molecule water and their harmonics (I only used water as an example, because it is a simple compound and not proprietary).
In a PPM, water, alcohol, and lighter fluid all precess at basically the same frequency. What is it? Why? And why does it not follow your "discovered" averaging claim?
 
"I discovered?" Again: Can you cite any scientific reference that supports this? Because this is not how NMR works, not at all.


In a PPM, water, alcohol, and lighter fluid all precess at basically the same frequency. What is it? Why? And why does it not follow your "discovered" averaging claim?
If I remember correctly, the instructions for my proton magnetometer said that lighter fluid is to be used because it has a higher density of hydrogen than water (Google it). Also, lighter fluid doesn't freeze, and water has oxygen, which can corrode the coils.

FYI, since I discovered this method of calculating a dowsable frequency for any chemical formula, it is the scientific community that needs to catch up (I did show a source with scientific references that give the principle of how it works, namely the Larmor Frequency). Since science is biased against dowsing, you will find no such reference that you seek. However, I know of several famous scientists that were dowsers, who kept to themselves. You cannot always know why something works; if you want to know if something works, as I always say, try it. There is a great deal that science doesn't understand, evidenced by it being the pursuit of knowledge, implying a lack of knowledge or a belief system. Science claims to be objective, which is humanly impossible, because empirical data still requires interpretation, which is subjective and inherently tied to belief. Concerning detecting water, I first tried the NMR frequency for hydrogen or oxygen by themselves, which did not work, then I tried the NMR frequency for both hydrogen and oxygen combined, which did not work; finally, I tried averaging the frequency for every occurring element H+H+O/3, which gave a frequency that worked with dowsing (I don't care about what science doesn't know; these calculated frequencies for chemical formulas always work for dowsing for a given magnetic field strength).
 
If I remember correctly, the instructions for my proton magnetometer said that lighter fluid is to be used because it has a higher density of hydrogen than water (Google it). Also, lighter fluid doesn't freeze, and water has oxygen, which can corrode the coils.

FYI, since I discovered this method of calculating a dowsable frequency for any chemical formula, it is the scientific community that needs to catch up (I did show a source with scientific references that give the principle of how it works, namely the Larmor Frequency). Since science is biased against dowsing, you will find no such reference that you seek. However, I know of several famous scientists that were dowsers, who kept to themselves. You cannot always know why something works; if you want to know if something works, as I always say, try it. There is a great deal that science doesn't understand, evidenced by it being the pursuit of knowledge, implying a lack of knowledge or a belief system. Science claims to be objective, which is humanly impossible, because empirical data still requires interpretation, which is subjective and inherently tied to belief. Concerning detecting water, I first tried the NMR frequency for hydrogen or oxygen by themselves, which did not work, then I tried the NMR frequency for both hydrogen and oxygen combined, which did not work; finally, I tried averaging the frequency for every occurring element H+H+O/3, which gave a frequency that worked with dowsing (I don't care about what science doesn't know; these calculated frequencies for chemical formulas always work for dowsing for a given magnetic field strength).

Have you tried alternative periodic tables and atomic models? Like Walter Russell/etc.
In my own experiments, it didn't take much to realize mainstream since is very far behind, as the official scientists are always busy gaslighting each other
 
Have you tried alternative periodic tables and atomic models? Like Walter Russell/etc.
In my own experiments, it didn't take much to realize mainstream since is very far behind, as the official scientists are always busy gaslighting each other
Actually, that was what I was thinking, but I didn't remember what to call it. I found an old screenshot about Terrence Howard (actor in the first Iron Man movie), who mentions Walter Russell's alternative periodic table, which arranges the elements in octaves. I have spent most of my dowsing on finding frequencies of colors of light for healing (for example: gray hair, Coronavirus, Colds, Flu, Poison Ivy, Spider Bites, Asthma, Cancer, etc), rather than for treasure hunting (to me there is much overlap). If you can detect pathogens in the body, then you can detect treasure in the earth (the problem is "aged targets", something that has been buried for several years, give dowsers false locations, which need to be corrected). I prefer dowsing with frequencies derived by physically sweeping frequencies, because they stay the same regardless of magnetic fields, not needing adjustment (unlike those calculated from the periodic table). My being able to detect DNA and match it in any photo or video has it's advantages. It just so happens that the "Amazing Randi", who challenged many dowsers, had High Priest Levite DNA, so he would have been a very capable dowser, which makes me suspect that he actually knew that it worked and knew how to shut down a dowser.
 
Since science is biased against dowsing, you will find no such reference that you seek.

Science claims to be objective, which is humanly impossible, because empirical data still requires interpretation, which is subjective and inherently tied to belief.
Is it subjective to put water in a PPM sensor, place the RX coil on an oscilloscope, and see a 2.13kHz precession frequency when pulsing a magnetic field? Is it then subjective to replace the water with alcohol, and then lighter fluid, and still see the exact same 2.13kHz precession frequency? And then calculate the Larmor frequency for hydrogen and find it to be the same 2.13kHz? Is all of this based purely on belief?

And that's the answer to the prior questions. They all precess at 2.13kHz in a 50uT ambient field because it is only the hydrogen atoms that are precessing. In water, the oxygen atom is almost always O-16 which has no dipole moment, therefore no precession frequency. Same with carbon-12 in alcohol and lighter fluid.

What separates science from pseudoscience is the ability for anyone, anywhere, to replicate the experiment and get the same results. You don't have to believe what frequency water precesses at, you can actually measure it and see for yourself. That's the funny thing about dowsers... they all have theories that go all over the place, often contradicting one another, and none of the theories can survive even the slightest scientific investigation. Your averaging claim for calculating NMR frequencies is obviously wrong, and dowsing has nothing to do with NMR anyways. But you're in good company around here as it's no more or no less wrong than all the claims @dowser makes about his frequency nonsense.

The two consistent traits I've noticed with dowsers are the proclivity for making up semi-science-sounding explanations for how their dowsing works (or doesn't work) -- usually mangling real science in the process -- and the utter inability to objectively investigate their own claims. The truth is, most dowsers just don't want to do the latter, preferring instead to simply believe the alternative facts they've created to explain a skill they don't really have.
 
Last edited:
Actually, that was what I was thinking, but I didn't remember what to call it. I found an old screenshot about Terrence Howard (actor in the first Iron Man movie), who mentions Walter Russell's alternative periodic table, which arranges the elements in octaves. I have spent most of my dowsing on finding frequencies of colors of light for healing (for example: gray hair, Coronavirus, Colds, Flu, Poison Ivy, Spider Bites, Asthma, Cancer, etc), rather than for treasure hunting (to me there is much overlap). If you can detect pathogens in the body, then you can detect treasure in the earth (the problem is "aged targets", something that has been buried for several years, give dowsers false locations, which need to be corrected). I prefer dowsing with frequencies derived by physically sweeping frequencies, because they stay the same regardless of magnetic fields, not needing adjustment (unlike those calculated from the periodic table). My being able to detect DNA and match it in any photo or video has it's advantages. It just so happens that the "Amazing Randi", who challenged many dowsers, had High Priest Levite DNA, so he would have been a very capable dowser, which makes me suspect that he actually knew that it worked and knew how to shut down a dowser.

Yeah, thats how i ended up on this forum, after dowsing for real world problems in forensics for long, solving crimes and tracking stolen property, not for monetary rewards (before someone attacks me). Another very informed member here suggested i study the dowsing bible Supersensonics book which optimized me to next level. It needs debugging and understanding. Looking for treasure is also fun for me.

I have thought of the ideas of frequency dowsing as whacky because of the EMF suit stories and no real information from credible sources, now I have to dig deeper into this and integrate it into my protocols.

The reasons why i know dowsers fail in "tests" are in another thread, but i can just say it one sentence, its all rigged invalid experiments, broken dowsers participating, you know many old timers are full of crap, Randi sucker punched them K.O. As for the pro-Skeptic on this forum, he is a good guy most probably, and wants to believe the world that is pulled over everyone's eyes.. the ramifications of telekinesis/dowsing/etc violating the established science is too much for many. If i was unlucky enough to only encounter dowsing scammers of low character, i would have probably been the same as him.. The biggest skeptics became my biggest proponents in the real world. They dont get it, but they know i will bring solutions.
 
Is it subjective to put water in a PPM sensor, place the RX coil on an oscilloscope, and see a 2.13kHz precession frequency when pulsing a magnetic field? Is it then subjective to replace the water with alcohol, and then lighter fluid, and still see the exact same 2.13kHz precession frequency? And then calculate the Larmor frequency for hydrogen and find it to be the same 2.13kHz? Is all of this based purely on belief?

And that's the answer to the prior questions. They all precess at 2.13kHz in a 50uT ambient field because it is only the hydrogen atoms that are precessing. In water, the oxygen atom is almost always O-16 which has no dipole moment, therefore no precession frequency. Same with carbon-14 in alcohol and lighter fluid.

What separates science from pseudoscience is the ability for anyone, anywhere, to replicate the experiment and get the same results. You don't have to believe what frequency water precesses at, you can actually measure it and see for yourself. That's the funny thing about dowsers... they all have theories that go all over the place, often contradicting one another, and none of the theories can survive even the slightest scientific investigation. Your averaging claim for calculating NMR frequencies is obviously wrong, and dowsing has nothing to do with NMR anyways. But you're in good company around here as it's no more or no less wrong than all the claims @dowser makes about his frequency nonsense.

The two consistent traits I've noticed with dowsers are the proclivity for making up semi-science-sounding explanations for how their dowsing works (or doesn't work) -- usually mangling real science in the process -- and the utter inability to objectively investigate their own claims. The truth is, most dowsers just don't want to do the latter, preferring instead to simply believe the alternative facts they've created to explain a skill they don't really have.

Im going to investigate this frequency pseudo-science proposed by Merlin-midas and judge it for myself experimentally, as there is nothing to win in playing by the same rules of the 3 million humans complying and obeying theoretical scriptures. Just like you indicated you are working inside the theoretical rules of geophysics. The game changes when you become experimental.

You love theoretical Einstein, but fail to see how his experimental peers like Felix Ehrenhaft found holes all over the place,
Einstein was given many chance to witness the easily demonstrable violations of theoretical physics, from Ehrenhaft's letters
we can see how it ended, instead of applying scientific method Einstein applied extreme narcissism. Today anyone can assemble
Ehrenhaft's basic experiments and see for themselves the scam of the Theoreticians.


1780471456761.webp
 
L-rod Dowsing is the use of antenna to indicate a resonating frequency, and indicate the different Element Frequencies present in that Dowsed anomaly!
If you have a different way that you Dowse to solve crimes, start a thread about it.
If you don't Dowse Elements frequencies, what do you Dowse?
The wind, dirt, bullets, graves, unpaid child support?

So how would a small child with no comprehension of what you say, be able to locate golf balls quickly and efficiently with L rods if shown for 5 minutes?

Here is the problem, the "pro" dowsers with decades of posting and credentials in dowsing here, says its not possible, then these dowsers became just like the Einsteins of the word, announcing theories all day. But if someone cannot find the golf ball, they fail the kindergarten test of dowsing in my opinion.

Go and test yourself with Golf balls, then reflect here, but you will not, because the core message you have is obstacles and reasons why dowsing doesn't work from a position of the post count throne. Nobody must go and dowse, they must be confused and never pick up some rods according to you.
 
You hijacked my thread.
It was a discussion about Dowsing now, and I was asking if anyone saw the difference in the Dowsing rod pics I posted.
I'm not here to argue with you!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom