Tesorodeoro
Silver Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2018
- Messages
- 2,958
- Reaction score
- 5,155
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I would argue that we have no idea if solar farms are “cleaner”. Does that take into account the non-existent recycling that is occurring now? When 3000 acres of land destroyed by occupation of the panels, then the pollution when they are destroyed by hail or fire, then the disposal AND replacement are concerned? I am highly doubtful everything is being taken into account. But please present your case.There is no 100% clean way to make energy, and all methods have varying environmental impacts. But solar and wind are significantly cleaner than oil and coal, and otherwise have lower environmental impacts, even accounting for their life cycles. The nice thing about solar/wind/battery is that a lot of it is recyclable: the copper, silicon, lithium, etc all have high recyclability. When you burn oil and coal, it's gone forever, leaving behind a lot of nasties that have to be dealt with. Besides that, fossil fuels are dead-ends; they have an eventual expiration date, and the later we wait to deal with that the more expensive it will get.
This is the worst-case scenario in a country like China, where coal is the dominant fuel for making the electricity that powers the car. In the US, the break-even point is around 14,000 miles.
Most states require power companies to buy back excess power at the full retail rate. I think this is misguided, they should only pay the wholesale rate. The difference between wholesale and retail is the money used to pay for the infrastructure.
You Do know these supposed over all calculations take into account carbon credits don’t you? Large companies buying forest land to “lock carbon up” by not harvesting timber or doing limited harvesting. When it burns all that sequestered carbon is released which is not accounted for of course. It’s so complicated, it’s impossible to actually calculate the overall impact. All that said, I’m a big proponent of personal solar panels.
I know of 100,000 acres of sequestered carbon that was burned in less that 5 years just locally. Not just forest land, but privately owned forest land that is encumbered by carbon credit investment from all over the world.
Last edited:







