H3 element detector

[dowser]

A non believer is someone that wasn't shown..

 

[geowizard]

What happened to H3Tec?

Companies involved in unproven, untestible, probable fraudulent products are soon found in a courtroom.
Watch-dog groups including local and Federal government watch-dogs seek out entities that are fleecing the public.

After settlement, they quietly go away.

- Geowizard

 

[geowizard]

A non believer is someone that wasn't shown..

dowser,

"Showing" is not believing to non-believers. Non-believers have reasons for their knowledge of the physical World, Their knowledge is based on physical, not meta-physical powers. Dowsers have an undefined power to dowse. Dowsing is not repeatable by people that don't have the meta-physical power to dowse! Non-believers think the dowser moves the rods. The rods move under an unexplained force that only dowsers have. The force cannot be explained in the physical World.

- Geowizard

 

[Assembler]

That's impossible. A detector is not a collector.

I suppose detecting and not collecting is an option.

- Geowizard

The post is effective in 'Collecting' more input I 'Detect'.............

 

[dowser]

dowser,

The rods move under an unexplained force that only dowsers have. The force cannot be explained in the physical World.

- Geowizard

I understand how people are about Dowsing.
Disregard the content posted by a Dowser, and continue on without believing or discussing the explanations.
There is no saying, the less you know, the smarter you are. Seems to fit the skeptics..

 

[Assembler]

I understand how people are about Dowsing.
Disregard the content posted by a Dowser, and continue on without believing or discussing the explanations.
There is no saying, the less you know, the smarter you are. Seems to fit the skeptics..

Perhaps the laws of Nature come in to play?

 

[dowser]

The rods do move under explained force, I've explained it.
The force can be explained, I explained that.
It comes down to 2 choices.
Believe a Dowser!
Believe there is no answer!
I believe a Dowser, me..

 

[Ism]

If they worked, you'd see the videos on social media. Discovery would do a show or three. And the owners wouldn't live in ramshackle mobile homes driving a rusty truck with 4 unmatched rims.

I agree with everything except Discovery channel. They will do videos on anything Including ancient aliens, ghosts, and Bigfoot. You seen Blind Frog Ranch yet?

 

[dowser]

They don't work now, they did work then.
It's from frequency interference, they work off frequencies.

 

[Carl-NC]

Discussion was diverted to $10,000 LRL detectors to detect Helium 3. $20M per gram

By you. I hope you're done with this now.

Are you sure about that?
Because I had contacted him to prove my Dowsing back then, and he informed me that he's only testing LRLs not Dowsers.
And I have offered to show anyone that shows up.
Nobody came to see my proof of Dowsing, and it wouldn't cost $25.000 for the visit.

My $25,000 prize was originally focused on LRL manufacturers. However, I have allowed individuals to give it a try, and I would allow you. For LRL manufacturers, I will bear the burden of travel. For individuals, they have to bear the burden of travel. I believe I explained all this to you before. So if you're interested, drop me a PM, we can set something up.

 

[Assembler]

Nonbeliever
A person who lacks belief or confidence in a specific idea, undertaking, philosophy, or theory.

One can see / follow the theory of frequencies yet still lack confidence in the practical use thereof with the flood / bands of frequencies in common use today that will cloud the practical use of say cooper rods in one's hands and the nervous system as an example. This is common with a lot of people.

 

[dowser]

By you. I hope you're done with this now.


My $25,000 prize was originally focused on LRL manufacturers. However, I have allowed individuals to give it a try, and I would allow you. For LRL manufacturers, I will bear the burden of travel. For individuals, they have to bear the burden of travel. I believe I explained all this to you before. So if you're interested, drop me a PM, we can set something up.

I appreciate the offer, but I don't believe in double blind test and testers, that aren't Dowsers.
I posted before, the proof should be in the treasure find, not which cup hides a penny.
I've posted the legal way for a Dowser to prove to the world.
Go Dowse a bunch of Diamond at the Diamond mine in Arkansas. That would convince me.

 

[Assembler]

By you. I hope you're done with this now.


My $25,000 prize was originally focused on LRL manufacturers. However, I have allowed individuals to give it a try, and I would allow you. For LRL manufacturers, I will bear the burden of travel. For individuals, they have to bear the burden of travel. I believe I explained all this to you before. So if you're interested, drop me a PM, we can set something up.

Your serious offer should be taken up.
I will also refer anyone to your offer as a great opportunity for anyone willing to put the question to a blind testing.

Thank you for this generous offer.

 

[dowser]

Your serious offer should be taken up.
I will also refer anyone to your offer as a great opportunity for anyone willing to put the question to a blind testing.

Thank you for this generous offer.

Times have changed, and Dowsing signal changed with it.
Back around 2000, Dowsers and Lrl inventor's were a dime a dozen.

 

[3RDLIFE]

I agree with everything except Discovery channel. They will do videos on anything Including ancient aliens, ghosts, and Bigfoot. You seen Blind Frog Ranch yet?

That's what I mean, they can't even get a show on a channel that does ridiculous urban legends and conspiracy theories.

 

[robertk]

I appreciate the offer, but I don't believe in double blind test and testers, that aren't Dowsers.

That's OK -- double blind testers don't believe in Dowsers either.

 

[Assembler]

That's OK -- double blind testers don't believe in Dowsers either.

If you believe in but don't have a record of results in one vs. the other can come to mind here.