
bdhoward said:I think I have a lousy area to CRH in. I have only found 1 90%er all year and 8 40%ers so far (3 of which were the 1776-1976 S 40%ers). HH to all. Bryan H.
searching through a roll of half dollars- out pops a 1776-1976 bicentennial proof "s" mintmark, it is not silver and is hardly recognizable as a proof, but it is... just thought I would add that, i'll keep it though. hh!BuffaloBoy said:Out of 17 boxes ($8,500) I have not gotten no bicentennial proofs let alone a silver one
The one on the left has got to be a proof. Its finish is "mirror" like as opposed to the others. The others have a normal luster to them. I'm not sure how the mint produced their silver clad sets. HH. Bryan H.hombre_de_plata_flaco said:The one on the left looks like a proof to me, but it could be the lighting?
Is the reason these are so hard to find because they were only released in a three-piece silver-clad mint set? There was a three-piece silver-clad proof set for that year as well.
bdhoward said:The one on the left has got to be a proof. Its finish is "mirror" like as opposed to the others. The others have a normal luster to them. I'm not sure how the mint produced their silver clad sets. HH. Bryan H.hombre_de_plata_flaco said:The one on the left looks like a proof to me, but it could be the lighting?
Is the reason these are so hard to find because they were only released in a three-piece silver-clad mint set? There was a three-piece silver-clad proof set for that year as well.
I really thought they looked 90% to me. But all the literature that I have come across there is no mention of them minting a 90% 1776-1976 s bicentennial. So everything leads me to believe they are only 40% silver. Also, thanks for all the good info on this topic hombre. HH. Bryan H.TheRockDoc said:bdhoward said:The one on the left has got to be a proof. Its finish is "mirror" like as opposed to the others. The others have a normal luster to them. I'm not sure how the mint produced their silver clad sets. HH. Bryan H.hombre_de_plata_flaco said:The one on the left looks like a proof to me, but it could be the lighting?
Is the reason these are so hard to find because they were only released in a three-piece silver-clad mint set? There was a three-piece silver-clad proof set for that year as well.
So, with that said, is the mint proof, or deep cameo a 90%'er? I am still a little confused, Everthing I have read says that those Bicentennial proofs are 40% but those edges in those pics sure look 90% to me (could just be the pic I guess)?
MIhunter said:As I posted in another thread, I just found another 1976 S Copper/Nickel Proof and 1976 S Silver Clad. This brings my total to 2 each.
There were no 90% 1976 halves made. You can't tell the difference betwenn a 40% and a 90% half or whole dollar. The 40% coins have a copper core and are surrounded by 80% silver and 20% copper. That is the part you see, and I doubt anyone can tell the difference between 80% and 90% silver coin by sight.