Ouija board
- Thread starter dowser
- Start date
Fact is it isn't proven real or authentic, there is no museum, reputible archologist, or geologist that have documented it as genuine or real. As I said I dont deal in fake or un-documented artifacts.
If it was genuine scientists would be beaten down the doors to examine it.
dowser
Silver Member
- #63
Thread Owner
So it's all fake, all the pics, and excavation digging and retrieving videos, the thousands of unexplained artifacts, which are quite a few.
HArd to believe what I see, the amount of info is overwhelming for fakes. YouTube Tula Hidalgo alien carvings.
You don't believe, I believe. No big deal..
dowser
Silver Member
- #64
Thread Owner
I'm not trying to convince anyone, I'm posting what I read and watched.
As far as documentation, pics and videos were taken during excavation.
Nobody has authority or credentials to authenticate Alien carvings and technology.
Nobody wants to put their careers on the line, making these artifacts unique.
Possibly real but no one to prove it.
WoW, that sounds familiar! Where has that happened? Oh yeah, I'm a Dowser..
There is nobody with Dowsing credentials to confirm it. Same as nobody with credentials, to confirm Alien technology. That doesn't make it fake, in my opinion..
As far as documentation, pics and videos were taken during excavation.
Nobody has authority or credentials to authenticate Alien carvings and technology.
Nobody wants to put their careers on the line, making these artifacts unique.
Possibly real but no one to prove it.
WoW, that sounds familiar! Where has that happened? Oh yeah, I'm a Dowser..
There is nobody with Dowsing credentials to confirm it. Same as nobody with credentials, to confirm Alien technology. That doesn't make it fake, in my opinion..
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Messages
- 5,420
- Reaction score
- 31,207
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Detector(s) used
- Xterra 705
Gold Monster 2000
I did a search on "YouTube Tula Hidalgo alien carvings" and nothing in that title came up. There were some bogus ones that are typical of youtube stuff now but nothing with that title. Can you give me a link to the exact one you mean.
Red-Coat
Gold Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 7,877
- Reaction score
- 24,915
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Lots of stuff here. Videos, pictures, claims from Michael Forest. All unverified. Make of it what you will:
Alien Carvings
ojuelos de jalisco and tula hidalgo alien stone carvings, found in or around these localities. Guerrero, Cuizeo and more! ancient
, cap,
sleeping,
spacecraft
dead
pendant,
pilot,
artifact,
ufo,
spaceman,
mexico,
aztec,
print,
clay,
alien
, finger
eltoro,
sarcophagus...
aliencarvings.com
Red-Coat
Gold Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 7,877
- Reaction score
- 24,915
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Why do you never provide links to where these images come from? Usually they're from Facebook posts which also don't provide background or justification for the claims being made.
I would bet that the carbon dating from UGA is from contaminant carbonate residues, not the carved piece itself... as was the case for the cube you posted.
Red-Coat
Gold Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 7,877
- Reaction score
- 24,915
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Which are two very good reasons for treating them with a high degree of scepticism.
Jeff H
Bronze Member
All this reminds me of Erich Daniken back in the 1970s who published the Chariots of the Gods. He was a first class charlatan. When it was proven that he was a fraud and that he hired a local tribe to create all these rock carvings depicting alien ships and beings, many people didn't care and they still chose to believe his nonsense. Some people have a level of gullibility that is immune to any amount of reasoning or evidence contrary to their belief.
Red-Coat
Gold Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 7,877
- Reaction score
- 24,915
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Surrey, UK
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I spent the early part of my career working in an Applied Physics laboratory that was part of a Research & Development facility. We conducted Near Infra-Red analyses, Thermoluminescence testing, Gas-Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, Gel Electrophoresis and a whole host of other protocols. One thing we had to constantly remind those who commissioned tests is that, while the results can be regarded as reliable, they don’t necessarily provide an interpretation.
For example, in post #39, you paraded pictures of a carved cube trawled from Facebook without any context and said “This cube they tested is 34,000 yrs old.” As I pointed out in post #44 that’s not the case. You were suckered into believing Michael Forest’s interpretation of the carbon dating, which the actual report from the University of Georgia indicates was derived from foraminifera samples (believed to have been scraped from it). Not testing of the cube itself. You accepted as fact something which is an interpretation, and for which the complete picture was not available to you.
The University of Georgia’s date determination is to be trusted, but it only represents factual information on the provided sample. Forest’s interpretation that this means the cube is 34,000 years old is unsupported by the actual sample testing result. That’s the kind of issue we constantly had to remind those who commissioned testing from us.
Last edited:
Jeff H
Bronze Member
I agree with you on that Dowser. For me, the distances between our solar system and even our closest neighboring solar systems are so great, that travel between them is almost incomprehensible. Maybe if they could manipulate space/time, I might be able imagine it. But if they could manipulate space/time, why would they give a flying hoot about us?
Top TreasureNet Finds!
Top TreasureNet Finds!
Users who are viewing this thread
Supporting Vendors
View all →
