Isn't it astonishing that on a thread started over two-years ago, and with over 150 responses, you can count the Tesoro haters and detractors taking part in it on one hand?![]()
Its Terry that doesn't seem to like the Vaquero (Tejon way better in his view). Unfortunately the Tejon doesn't cope as well with alkaline and magnetic soils. The Tejon can also have more problems with EMI. Vaquero smoother running, less chatter, faster autotune whilst the Tejon has more gain. Gain doesn't help in Arizona where I have family. I remember Sandman agreeing that those who say the Tejon is better than the Vanquero "haven't tried to use it west of the Rockies".
Must not forget that Vince (of Tesoro) said that the Vaquero is deeper in bad ground.
At least Terry HAS admitted to using Minelab, having posted on Treasure Net only a few weeks back that you should only use U.S. machines.
Keep trying U.K., and MAYBE one day you'll get it right - or have a stroke. Whichever.![]()
VDI screens and numbers are a GIMMICK, plain and simple. If you are discriminating out iron and foil with a Tesoro, if you get a repeatable signal you dig it with confidence - period. If you are relying on VDI numbers as to whether or not you dig a target you WILL miss treasure. No hobbyist that has been doing this for more than five-years relies on VDI screens - we trust our machines and our EARS.
.
Its Terry that doesn't seem to like the Vaquero (Tejon way better in his view). Unfortunately the Tejon doesn't cope as well with alkaline and magnetic soils. The Tejon can also have more problems with EMI. Vaquero smoother running, less chatter, faster autotune whilst the Tejon has more gain. Gain doesn't help in Arizona where I have family. I remember Sandman agreeing that those who say the Tejon is better than the Vanquero "haven't tried to use it west of the Rockies".
Must not forget that Vince (of Tesoro) said that the Vaquero is deeper in bad ground.
At least Terry HAS admitted to using Minelab, having posted on Treasure Net only a few weeks back that you should only use U.S. machines.
Treasure Hunter...Norbyx has repeatedly given his view on the Vanquero along the lines of post #31 "disliked it in every sense". #46 quoted by T.S. is him being sarcastic. This is similar trick to my being quoted as "I can't recommend buying a Deepstar" when the actual post in context was "for $2000 when you can no longer get them repaired". A kids trick but no doubt catches a few.
Here's a post from "Diggers" "The east European brands are making great strides so why not Tesoro. They use to be top dog in the UK but since then they have taken a big drop as the newer brands have stolen the show"
The answer could be in Steve Herschbach's post "I hate to say it but I think Tesoro is not really in the running anymore when it comes to new detectors. It takes more money than they seem willing to invest to enter the 21st century. Can anyone really imagine them coming out with a Deus type product. Or a CTX 3030 ? Or a V3i ?
Just a few examples but you get my drift."
This is VERY simple: Will a "Deus type product, or a CTX 3030, or a V3i," find anything a Vaquero won't? The answer is no. Do they have higher prices and more "features" needed to justify those higher prices? Yes.
This is a fundamental argument. I hunt with CTX 3030 and Deus users ALL THE TIME. None of them find ANYTHING deeper or smaller than my Vaquero. Do they dig fewer holes than I do? Yes. Do I pull more GOLD than they do? Yes.
For me, that is the end of the argument.
Terry, when I was in the Army we were taught tolerance for those less fortunate such as Marines. I think your personality is leading your answers. I find it very hard to believe a Tesero is gonna keep up with a newer, modern machine. The science behind them is the same. But the programing and design is not. Tesero makes a good product and I would own one if I didnt already have one of the newer machines that produce. Also the operator makes a difference on any machine. I understand you are a expert with the Tesoro, I hope I can visit some day and you can school me on the Tesoror. But Im seeing some great stuff with with my own brand, and I am prejudiced I guess.
...But Im seeing some great stuff with with my own brand, and I am prejudiced I guess.
I own both types ive found gold with all of them everone will sound off on gold...
Do you dig nickel's and pulltabs with your Minelab's and your Teknetics? Because if you are not, you ain't finding any gold. The ONLY thing I don't dig is iron. Last time I went out with a CTX 3030, it still couldn't tell me if that iffy target was a gold ring or a pulltab. Fill us in with your wisdom DS, because I am willing to learn!
I dig alot of both and very few pieces of gold. I get a few but Western Montana would probably not be on anyones list for lost jewerly. You know good and well no detecter will tell the difference least of all a tesoro. Like i said before every detector ive had will go beep on a gold ring its up to the user from there.
BINGO! This is the entire point. Since NO machine - regardless of its price point or visual aids - can tell the difference between a good target and a piece of aluminum, how can ANYONE say the CTX or the Deus or any other machine is "more advanced," or a "better" machine than my $450.00 Vaquero coupled with my ears? Point blank - they can't. They can believe they have an advantage because they paid three-times more for their equipment, but they are just kidding themselves. After 30+ years of detecting with dozens of different machines and several different brands, I decided to just trust my experience and stick to my belief that if it is a solid, repeatable target - Dig It!
I Like Tesoro, because it is a SOLID, dependable detector, that has found as much or more treasure as ANY other Brand - AND, it is made in my home state by people I know, have met, and call my friends.
Some people like Whites, some like Garrett, and some just like to use the "newest," or "trendiest," or something made in Turkey. God Bless 'Em!