The Book Club

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jacob S. Wisner was born in Tyrone, Schuyler County, NY in 1830 to Henry (b.1785) & Jane (b. 1792) Wisner. Henry & Jane were married in Newtown, Pennsylvainia on August 2nd, 1811.

Henry Wisner (Jacob's father) volunteered at Seneca County, New York on August 28th, 1814 in the War of 1812. He served with Captain Sam McMath's Company of the NY Militia, in Colonel McMann's regiment. He was discharged at Batavia, NY on November 8th, 1814 and after received warrants for 40 & 120 acres of government land. Henry died in Tyrone on February 1st, 1871.

Jane Wisner (Jacob's mother) was the daughter of Lorrain Thorne (b.1747) of New Jersey, and Jane Paxton (b. 1755) of Berwick,VA. The Thornes were married in Bucks County, PA in 1770. Newtown, PA is also located in Bucks County. Lorrain and Jane raised eleven children: Mary (b. 1778), William (b.1779), Joseph (b.1781), Sarah (b.1785), Elizabeth (b. 1786), Letita (b. 1789), Jane (b. 1792), James Thomas (b.1794), Lorain (b.1795), Elizabeth (b. 1800), and Isaac (b. 1803).

Jane (widow) was living with her nephew G.H. James of Ohio (age 14) in NY, in 1875, and then with her daughter Elizabeth (Yosts) in 1880, when and where she passed.

In 1850, the Wisners (Henry & Jane) are found living in Orange, Steuben County, NY with their five children, Rosetta (b.1826), Henry (b.1820), Jacob (b.1830), William (b.1832), and Elizabeth (b.1836).

Some time after 1850, Jacob left home and reappears eleven years later as a resident of Exeter, Scott County, Illinois. There, in Exeter, Jacob enlisted on August 16th, 1861 as a private in Company B, 27th Illinois infantry. So, as a note, Jacob's military experience began in Illinois, in 61.

Wisner Jacob
Rank: Private
Company: B 27th Il US INF
Residence: Exeter, Scott Co, IL
Age: 31
Height: 5'6"
Hair: Brown
Eyes: Blue
Complexion: Sandy
Occupation: Carpenter.
Native: Tyrone, York (NY)
Joined: August 12, 1861
Mustered In: August 16th, 1861 Springfield, Il

more...
 

Last edited:
Hal,

Perhaps you might want to look into the history of Charles Frederick Higham.

Good luck,

Joe
 

Hal,

Blair was working backwards and in his research he had access to the Great Maricopa Registers which is a list of those individuals registering to vote. Jacob Waltz is listed in the register in 1876, 1882, 1884, 1886 and 1890.

An example of the information contained in the 1882 register lists the date and place of Naturalization. Thes entries were not conducive to copying since the information is across two pages and on one line. I transcribed the the Jacob Waltz entries. I ordered the LDS Microfilm of the Great Register and I can dig out the microfilm number if you would like to order the microfilm and view the information yourself.

Entry No. 781, Name: Waltz, Jacob, Country of Nativity: Germany, Place of Residence: Phoenix, Date of Naturailzation: July 19, 1961 Place and Court of Naturalization: Los Angeles, California, First District, Date of naturalization.

781
Waltz, Jacob
72
Germany
Phoenix
July 19, 1861
Los Angeles, Cal.
1st District
Oct 11, 1882
This matches the Waltz Naturalization date and place.

Researchers had the Register information and knew to look for the naturalization in LA. I have a copy of the LA Documents that I obtained on a visit to the Nationa Archives Laguna Niguel Branch. This is surely how Blair connected the dots.

You now have the a third dot which places the Jacob Waltz who was naturalized in LA as the Jacob Waltz in Phoenix in the Great Maricopa Register.

You now have the foundtion to generate some of your own dots relating to Waltz in Arizona.

I will be out of touch for about 6 weeks but will try to help you if you have additional questions.

I am not familiar with Azhiker's reference but I have viewed the Blair collection at the Arizona Historical Foundation on the fourth floor of the Hayden Library at Arizona State University. It was about three years ago and there were 7 boxes. I believe it still resides there so maybe Hiker can provide an update if it has been moved or there is a duplicate collection. I will try to run that down.

Garry
 

Hal,

Just an aside. Why do you beleive that Jacob Waltz had a partner named Jacob Weiser? It sounds like something that you have acepted as fact. What is your provenance for the story? How did it reach your ears and how far back have you been able to trace the story?

Thomas Weedin ties the Waltz partner story to John Walker but Weedin didn't name the partner and we run across the first versions of Weiser 40 years after Jacob Waltz died. Don't use Corbin's book as evidence as the original letter from Weedin to Ely and Bark (about 1912) didn't include the name Weiser. That entry was added by a modern day individual. :flag_red:

BTW Higham and Barnard are at least 50 years after Waltz. Hardly people with first hand information! If Higham had some original document he kept it to himself which would have been out of character. Be careful about accepting things as fact on your gut feeling.

Garry
 

Garry,
Did you feel that thump? That was me falling over Walzer's body, or it could have been Barnard's boot. Take your time while I pick myself up.

Thanks Garry...


But Garry, Barnard claims to have arrived in "Mesa in May of 1905, at the age of 13 and hungry". He would have and did have access to first hand accounts. So here I disagree. Believing your transcription still only puts your Jacob in Phoenix in 82. Is 82 the only year with this example?

It still does not explain the Walzer connection. Why would Herman and others make it up?

cactusjumper,
I will post what I find on Higham.
 

Last edited:
Hal,

These are the entries as I transcribed them. I have highlighted the entries in bold that are obviously not consistent. The July 19 date appears on 4 of the entries and the year, 1861 also appears on 4 entries, the age matches, the name matches.

I wish everything was perfect but that is not how how things work on many types of documents. I don't doubt they are all the same Jacob Waltz but you may be able to identify another candidate for Jacob Waltz in Phoenix who fits? If so, let me know and I will take a look.

Number
Name
Age
Country or
Nativity
Local
Residence
Naturalized
Date
Place and Court of
Naturalization
Registration
Date
142
Waltz, Jacob
66
Germany
Phoenix
1861
Los Angeles, Cal.
Court of ??
Sept 25,1876
781
Waltz, Jacob
72
Germany
Phoenix
July 19, 1861
Los Angeles, Cal.
1st District
Oct 11, 1882
787
Waltz, Jacob
74
Germany
Phoenix
July 19, 1861
California, District Court of Los Angeles
Sept 27, 1884
1358
Waltz, Jacob
76
Germany
Phoenix
July 19, 1861
Arizona, 1st Judicial District
Oct 6, 1886
1313
Waltz, Jacob
80
Germany
Phoenix
July 19, 1881
Phoenix, Arizona, 2nd Judicial District
Sept 8, 1890

Keep plugging!!! Maybe start assembling some of the additional documented references to Jacob Waltz and see if anything shakes out. Build your own timeline. Census, Mining Claims, Tax Records, Newspaper References, Petitions, etc.

Identify those documents that Jacob Waltz signed and do your own handwriting analysis.

I would be amiss in speculating on "why" people fabricate stories. When it comes to treasure stories, researchers spend most of their time trying to separate the wheat from the chaff and I think you would agree there is a lot more chaff than wheat.

BTW, How about running Barney Wayne Ellsworh Barnard down in the census, etc. I for one would like to know what you come up with. It's not a trick :laughing7: as I have never tried to track Barnard down.

Also, it would be a real revelation if you could find some indication that Herman Pertasch ever met Jacob Waltz.

Garry
 

Last edited:
Garry,
Let me finish the Wisner time-line first. I am not saying the Wisner name is correct. It has been suggested. There is a narrative and I am just trying to understand what could be fact and what has been fudged. Your proof about Waltz seems indisputable, but I can't drop the Walzer name until I know why two men, one respected, intentionally misrepresented the truth. Not only in tale, but officially, in letters to the Capital Librarian. It makes no sense.

Unless we are looking at two mines, and two different people?
 

Garry,
Let me finish the Wisner time-line first. I am not saying the Wisner name is correct. It has been suggested. There is a narrative and I am just trying to understand what could be fact and what has been fudged. Your proof about Waltz seems indisputable, but I can't drop the Walzer name until I know why two men, one respected, intentionally misrepresented the truth. Not only in tale, but officially, in letters to the Capital Librarian. It makes no sense.

Unless we are looking at two mines, and two different people?

Hal,

Do you know who is listed as the author of the first edition of "True Story of Jacob Walzer and his Famous Hidden Gold Mine.....(The Lost Dutchman)? Do you know what other well known manuscript he "deposited" at the Arizona State Library? Do you know what kind of reputation he had?

Dig up that man's history and you might find the answer to the "Walzer" question. It involves the story of a prize chicken.

image00221.jpg


Good luck,

Joe
 

Last edited:
Hal,

Do you know who is listed as the author of the first edition of "True Story of Jacob Walzer and his Famous Hidden Gold Mine.....(The Lost Dutchman)? Do you know what other well known manuscript he "deposited" at the Arizona State Library? Do you know what kind of reputation he had?

Dig up that man's history and you might find the answer to the "Walzer" question. It involves the story of a prize chicken.

image00221.jpg


Good luck,

Joe

cactusjumper,
I know of a story where one guy eats another guys prized chicken and in return, one signs over his half of a book they are writing. Where the Walzer name fits I am not sure, but I will have another look.

Thanks,
Black & Blue
 

Hal Croves

As I stated earlier, the Robert Blair collection is located with the Arizona Historical Foundation manuscripts housed at the Arizona Historical Society - Papago Park facility, 1300 N. College Avenue, Tempe, Arizona.

There are 6 total boxes holding the Blair collection. Box Number 2 holds some interesting tidbits you would be interested in.

Good luck in your research.

Azhiker
 

Hal Croves

As I stated earlier, the Robert Blair collection is located with the Arizona Historical Foundation manuscripts housed at the Arizona Historical Society - Papago Park facility, 1300 N. College Avenue, Tempe, Arizona.

There are 6 total boxes holding the Blair collection. Box Number 2 holds some interesting tidbits you would be interested in.

Good luck in your research.

Azhiker

Azhiker,
It will take some time to get back to AZ, but I will get there. I don't doubt you and believe that Blair was "conflicted" while writing the book. Something just feels off. I don't doubt Garry's facts, but after reading the Higham-McGee letters, I can not let Walzer go. The is something wrong with Blair. I can't explain it yet.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...860mef&sig=AHIEtbSd4_o4mCs-EtAM-1XNDeJYc5LkiQ

cactusjumper, Garry,
Very confused now. Higham comes across as a decent enough person... and I know of his other work. Did he just make up the information about his trip to New York and interviewing Walzer's secret family? Garry's facts are just overwhelming about the (naturalized) Jacob Waltz. But it does not make this Waltz the Dutchman... yet.

If Higham is telling the truth, and if his tin-type of Jacob von Wal(t)zer was taken in Jersey City, in 1864, then Jacob Waltz of the 64 census and Higham's Walzer are not the same man. That is amazing.... and Higham claims that Walzer found his mine in 1881. Has anyone seen this tin-type?

Jersey City?
 

Hal,

I know what is said about the Higham/Barnard story, but Barnard is not mentioned in that first edition......at all. To be honest, Higham was known for his tall tails. The other manuscript I mentioned, was the Holmes Manuscript. Tom K. tells me that Holmes denied writing the manuscript, right up to his death. He was good friends with Brownie.

Despite the stories that the Holmes family told Dr. Glover, something is wrong with that whole thing.

Take care,

Joe
 

I often make comments that make people wonder what the he!! I am talking about. People using multiple identities in order to attack others is one of my pet peaves.

This was recently posted on DUSA:

[TABLE="class: tablebg, width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: row1, bgcolor: #DEDECA, align: center"]StevenTrost[/TD]
[TD="class: row1, width: 100%, bgcolor: #DEDECA"][TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: gensmall, width: 100%"] Post subject: Re: Peralta Stones connection with the LDM?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:52 pm [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: profile row1, bgcolor: #DEDECA"][TABLE="width: 150, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]
file.php
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 9:17 am
Posts: 24
[/TD]
[TD="class: row1, bgcolor: #DEDECA"][TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]Hello somehiker,

The small article about Ramon Grijalva and the stone tablets didn't say how many stones he brought back to Phoenix but it was at least 2 because the article read, "stones", that could mean 2 or possibly more. It said he returned from Altar Sonora with them but that does not necessarily mean they came from Altar or that is where he obtained them. He was merely visiting in Altar, his hometown. For all we know, someone could have brought the stones to Altar from anywhere. The article didn't say Grijalva found the stones himself so it could have been someone else who had them and Grijalva somehow aquired them and brought them to Phoenix. So many questions unanswered.

I have to agree with you, I don't think the two stone maps we have today are the complete set of instructions. There seems to be something missing.

I forgot to mention in my first post, in addition to Ramon Grijalva living for a time on the south half of Waltz's property, a Peralta also was listed in census and tax records as living on that same south half of Waltz's property also and in the same time period.

Azhiker


[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

After awhile, it becomes more and more difficult to juggle all those names. On the other hand, someone
certainly knows their local history.

Just saying.......

Joe Ribaudo
 

Last edited:
cactusjumper and those willing to help,
PLEASE, will someone please tell me if this is a mistake or not. It may help to explain things.

. "He moved from Los Angeles to Wickenburg, Arizona, in 1862, and the 1864 Territorial Census of the Third District (Yavapai County) lists him as Jacob Walzer, a miner who had lived in the county for two years. In this same census is listed Jacob Wisner, a carpenter, living in the town of Florence."

source:
http://www.ecv5917.com/Articles/More%20on%20waltz%20and%20Dutchman%20mine.htm
 

Last edited:
I often make comments that make people wonder what the he!! I am talking about. People using multiple identities in order to attack others is one of my pet peaves.

This was recently posted on DUSA:

[TABLE="class: tablebg, width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: row1, bgcolor: #DEDECA, align: center"]StevenTrost[/TD]
[TD="class: row1, width: 100%, bgcolor: #DEDECA"][TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="class: gensmall, width: 100%"] Post subject: Re: Peralta Stones connection with the LDM?
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:52 pm [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: profile row1, bgcolor: #DEDECA"][TABLE="width: 150, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]
file.php
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 9:17 am
Posts: 24
[/TD]
[TD="class: row1, bgcolor: #DEDECA"][TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]Hello somehiker,

The small article about Ramon Grijalva and the stone tablets didn't say how many stones he brought back to Phoenix but it was at least 2 because the article read, "stones", that could mean 2 or possibly more. It said he returned from Altar Sonora with them but that does not necessarily mean they came from Altar or that is where he obtained them. He was merely visiting in Altar, his hometown. For all we know, someone could have brought the stones to Altar from anywhere. The article didn't say Grijalva found the stones himself so it could have been someone else who had them and Grijalva somehow aquired them and brought them to Phoenix. So many questions unanswered.

I have to agree with you, I don't think the two stone maps we have today are the complete set of instructions. There seems to be something missing.

I forgot to mention in my first post, in addition to Ramon Grijalva living for a time on the south half of Waltz's property, a Peralta also was listed in census and tax records as living on that same south half of Waltz's property also and in the same time period.

Azhiker


[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

After awhile, it becomes more and more difficult to juggle all those names. On the other hand, someone
certainly knows their local history.

Just saying.......

Joe Ribaudo

To be fair Joe, you have done the same on at least one occasion.....here:
Lost Dutchman Gold Mine - Arizona Superstition Mountain Wilderness - Gold Mining ? View topic - Say it ain't so, Joe.

pippinwhitepaws
Post subject: megalomaniac
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:53 pm
Offline
Expert

Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 805
No one has placed the Stone Maps anywhere in the Superstitions, with

everything in the proper place and proportion except, of course, me. ;)

Here is the sequence of how I put the Stone Maps together. I first

purchased Travis Marlow's pamphlet over thirty years ago. When I first

saw the wavy line on the lower trail map, I thought it looked something

like the outline of the main mountain.

Using that as a starting point, I looked at my topo and found a canyon

that made the same line as the bent arrow and followed it to the top of

the mountain. The trail immediately came into view.

I saw the Stone Maps, made a lucky guess and the rest of the two maps are

obvious......even easy. So easy, a blindbowman could see it.

Randy is somewhat confused. I don't believe the LDM is in Little Boulder

Canyon. I have never believed that or said such a thing to anyone.

I challenge anyone.....right now. Show me where my trail deviates from

the Stone Map Trail. If I am full of $%!t, show me. Show me where one

other person on the planet can put as many features of the Stone Maps on

a topographic map and have them in the proper sequence and

proportion.....It can't be done.....period.

I have given every point required for each and everyone of you to lay out

your own map. To not see it after that, you must be blind or stoned. In

some cases, perhaps both.

The rest of you are talkers. I have laid it out in black and white.

Everyone else tells us a wild-assed story and says "someday". I don't

claim there is a treasure to be found, just that I have solved the MAP.

The end of the map is in Little Boulder Canyon, exactly in the spot where

the heart I have shown is located.

It's very simple. Start at the bottom of Hieroglyphic Canyon and follow

the map into Little Boulder Canyon, or start at the knife point (Parker

Pass) and follow the map into Little Boulder Canyon.......and

on.......and on. The starting points are redundant. The ending point is

at the heart.

Also simple.....If it ain't so.....show me.

Joe Ribaudo

AZhiker has been posting on T-Net since Jan 09, 2010, on various topics.
Historical and personal missives by AZhiker also appear on other forums, including HikeArizona, going back even further.
Having compared the grammar and structure of their postings, I see little similarity between those of Craig Roberts/Aurum and posts submitted by Steven Trost/AZhiker .

Regards:Wayne
 

To be fair Joe, you have done the same on at least one occasion.....here:
Lost Dutchman Gold Mine - Arizona Superstition Mountain Wilderness - Gold Mining ? View topic - Say it ain't so, Joe.

pippinwhitepaws
Post subject: megalomaniac
PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:53 pm
Offline
Expert

Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:30 pm
Posts: 805
No one has placed the Stone Maps anywhere in the Superstitions, with

everything in the proper place and proportion except, of course, me. ;)

Here is the sequence of how I put the Stone Maps together. I first

purchased Travis Marlow's pamphlet over thirty years ago. When I first

saw the wavy line on the lower trail map, I thought it looked something

like the outline of the main mountain.

Using that as a starting point, I looked at my topo and found a canyon

that made the same line as the bent arrow and followed it to the top of

the mountain. The trail immediately came into view.

I saw the Stone Maps, made a lucky guess and the rest of the two maps are

obvious......even easy. So easy, a blindbowman could see it.

Randy is somewhat confused. I don't believe the LDM is in Little Boulder

Canyon. I have never believed that or said such a thing to anyone.

I challenge anyone.....right now. Show me where my trail deviates from

the Stone Map Trail. If I am full of $%!t, show me. Show me where one

other person on the planet can put as many features of the Stone Maps on

a topographic map and have them in the proper sequence and

proportion.....It can't be done.....period.

I have given every point required for each and everyone of you to lay out

your own map. To not see it after that, you must be blind or stoned. In

some cases, perhaps both.

The rest of you are talkers. I have laid it out in black and white.

Everyone else tells us a wild-assed story and says "someday". I don't

claim there is a treasure to be found, just that I have solved the MAP.

The end of the map is in Little Boulder Canyon, exactly in the spot where

the heart I have shown is located.

It's very simple. Start at the bottom of Hieroglyphic Canyon and follow

the map into Little Boulder Canyon, or start at the knife point (Parker

Pass) and follow the map into Little Boulder Canyon.......and

on.......and on. The starting points are redundant. The ending point is

at the heart.

Also simple.....If it ain't so.....show me.

Joe Ribaudo

AZhiker has been posting on T-Net since Jan 09, 2010, on various topics.
Historical and personal missives by AZhiker also appear on other forums, including HikeArizona, going back even further.
Having compared the grammar and structure of their postings, I see little similarity between those of Craig Roberts/Aurum and posts submitted by Steven Trost/AZhiker .

Regards:Wayne

Wayne,

Interesting observations.

Since you know me personally, I can't imagine how you would think that I posted something as pip. I don't lie.......I have never attacked another person on the LDM Forums while using an alias. The few times I have used another name, I have always identified myself immediately. I would exclude Heidi, and I never attacked anyone using my pup's name.

If you believe that pip's post was actually me using his identity, you would also have to believe pip was me all along. That, for me, calls into question your assessment of the other names you mention in your post. Since pip has returned to this site, you might want to ask "Don" if you are correct. Following your non-existent logic, do you also believe I am "secretcanyon":dontknow:

I believe Don and I are in a better place these days, and I trust that he will smooth your troubled brow.

I consider you a friend, but you are on another planet with your last post.:unhappysmiley:

Kraig's name is not spelled "Craig".:tongue3:

Good luck,

Joe Ribaudo
 

Last edited:
Joe:

If it had been Pip who posted the copy of Steven Trost's post with it's apparent faux pas, I would have written the same retort.
With the exception of beginning with the name "Don"....or maybe "Harry"

Lost Dutchman Gold Mine - Arizona Superstition Mountain Wilderness - Gold Mining ? View topic - Say it ain't so, Joe.

So, even though I may at times be looking in from outside of these interpersonal exchanges of animosity, I'm not really so far away from the subject matter as to be on another planet. Every once in a while, I believe it's a good idea to offer another perspective on what might be wrong with conclusions based on preconceptions. You have made such an assumption publicly, using the AZhiker signature at the bottom of Steven's post to support your belief that he and AZhiker are the same person. They could be, but I really don't care if they are, so long as they don't start tag-teaming the rest of the contributors at DUSA or disrupting topics as doppelgangers.
If you read down that thread a few posts, you will see where I quoted Pip's comment and made an observation about the confusion caused by your signature at the bottom. My comment was never addressed by either of you.
Hopefully, I have made my point. That it would be just as easy for others to have concluded that Pip and yourself are one and the same.
Differences aside, we are friends, based on both our mutual acquaintance and respect for each other's knowledge,as well as the interest/camaraderie we share with so many within this community.

Regards:Wayne
 

Joe:

If it had been Pip who posted the copy of Steven Trost's post with it's apparent faux pas, I would have written the same retort.
With the exception of beginning with the name "Don"....or maybe "Harry"

Lost Dutchman Gold Mine - Arizona Superstition Mountain Wilderness - Gold Mining ? View topic - Say it ain't so, Joe.

So, even though I may at times be looking in from outside of these interpersonal exchanges of animosity, I'm not really so far away from the subject matter as to be on another planet. Every once in a while, I believe it's a good idea to offer another perspective on what might be wrong with conclusions based on preconceptions. You have made such an assumption publicly, using the AZhiker signature at the bottom of Steven's post to support your belief that he and AZhiker are the same person. They could be, but I really don't care if they are, so long as they don't start tag-teaming the rest of the contributors at DUSA or disrupting topics as doppelgangers.
If you read down that thread a few posts, you will see where I quoted Pip's comment and made an observation about the confusion caused by your signature at the bottom. My comment was never addressed by either of you.
Hopefully, I have made my point. That it would be just as easy for others to have concluded that Pip and yourself are one and the same.
Differences aside, we are friends, based on both our mutual acquaintance and respect for each other's knowledge,as well as the interest/camaraderie we share with so many within this community.

Regards:Wayne

Wayne,

I suppose you could be right, but it would take someone unfamiliar with me and what went on there. On the other hand, I can see where someone with extremely low intelligence could make that assumption. I would not expect you to even make the suggestion.

"You have made such an assumption publicly, using the AZhiker signature at the bottom of Steven's post to support your belief that he and AZhiker are the same person. They could be, but I really don't care if they are, so long as they don't start tag-teaming the rest of the contributors at DUSA or disrupting topics as doppelgangers."

I suppose that might be construed as quite a stretch, even for someone like me.

Perhaps you did not see where that particular "tag-teaming" took place on DUSA. In addition to that, they (he) also sent numerous complaints to Jim B. that I was being disrespectful to "spirit". Rather than look at the individual posts that they complained about, Jim simply banned me from the site.

I would say they achieved their purpose for posting in the first place. They have come here trying to do the same thing, but without the desired results. When complaints are made here, the moderators take the time to look at the offending posts.......unlike Jim or it would seem, my friend Wayne.

As long as people keep making excuses for the person behind these false accusations, history and personal deceit, he will continue his efforts.

Welcome to his side of the debate.....

Joe Ribaudo
 

The America Unearthed episode about the Tucson Artifacts is now on U-Tube


Regards:SH.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom