What's new

three map dowsing...

Dig deeper to find the source of the hits you’re getting.
Send me a picture of the whole dog I want to check it. Thank you.
 
The signal is 99.5 % guarantee from super mineralized rocks or more likely tiny stones.
To confirm that, try to determine if the signal is shifting sideways, even if only by 8 inches or so. Or if it is jumping sideways or if the numbers on your scale are jumping fast, If any of these are true, Then it is fake ( in other words natural signal )
Also, try to observe if stones the size of a fist or 2× fist are separating into almost equal halves exactly as you are digging. If yes, then contrary to logic - this place HAS NEVER BEEN TOUCHED by a shovel!
- Also its possible that some rounded stones were already totally " sliced" and it took only slight movement by your shovel or shaking to separate...
I would abandon this spot.
Not at this spot unless you would have gold and silver in be in n
The signal is 99.5 % guarantee from super mineralized rocks or more likely tiny stones.
To confirm that, try to determine if the signal is shifting sideways, even if only by 8 inches or so. Or if it is jumping sideways or if the numbers on your scale are jumping fast, If any of these are true, Then it is fake ( in other words natural signal )
Also, try to observe if stones the size of a fist or 2× fist are separating into almost equal halves exactly as you are digging. If yes, then contrary to logic - this place HAS NEVER BEEN TOUCHED by a shovel!
- Also its possible that some rounded stones were already totally " sliced" and it took only slight movement by your shovel or shaking to separate...
I would abandon this spot.
Let’s not forget about these but can you explain to me how can you have two different elements in the same spot as gold and silver that I’m looking at just at one small spot.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7455.webp
    IMG_7455.webp
    132.5 KB · Views: 62
Not at this spot unless you would have gold and silver in be in n

Let’s not forget about these but can you explain to me how can you have two different elements in the same spot as gold and silver that I’m looking at just at one small spot.
I thought you were looking for a compact container/ container where you said you were 1 foot down and had dug 3 feet × 3 feet wide.
I dont use detectors but I used to have 1 and the Pendulum would 90 % corroborate all results.

If i clearly understand your question, Yes your detector would probably discern between the 2 metals even within one compact spot but that doesn't mean that your detector is " not considering " what's next and around this spot at least within a very close proximity, and it doesn't mean what's around is not reinforcing at least by 30 % ( by different. Situation cases ) where Your detector AND THEN You think this spot is. The most enriched spot.....
The Pendulum also doesn't usually point to the greatest concentration of where Au and Ag are. ( or just 1 of the 2 ). It points/ swings to a very high concentration that IS THE ONE of probably SEVERAL concentrations within that 20 yards by 15 yards area AND HAPPENS to be physically closest to Where you stand.
Of you were standing and holding a pendulum.

In fact, for caches you should try to mentally override and ignore the highest Concentration/ strongest emanation Spot. Because that's natural Conglomeration of underground networks of the Noble elements.
The cache , especially if contemporarily hidden - say 1930s to 1970s, is where's the Suppressed signals Spot is.... Where ( and you might see part of this above ground ) the most cluttered immediate ground environments is. Where the stones are. And there might not even be any above ground, if a lot of pre'-planning was done on the part of the owner.

But broad Areas/ almost flat contemporary ridges are visible, where for example ground soil or other forest or human made materials were impressed, compressed into the ground for an area longer than say 3 or 4 feet lenght (say 8 or say 12 meters long gravel compressed into the ground alongside railroad tracks ( and maybe 15 to 20 meters sideways from the tracks) is Both luckily and at the same time may be for Deceptive measurement outcomes, producing Different emanation strengths for key elements or often All elements, somewhere not as Suppressed signal but also no more than 2/3 of swing lenght OF WHAT would have been produced by say of 250 grams copper compactly twisted old wires simply placed on top of that gravel ridge and basically.on top of the forest leafs.
* At probably most random points tested along the lenght of that 12 meters long slightly elevated gravel stripe.

In my experience, if I am standing in a wild field slope and there is 20 yards potential ground this way and 15 the other way.

So we need to look/ feel where the most cluttered say 3 feet by 5 feet area is. And find out Why out of a say 1/4 acre of a mixed new and old forest with Benign homogeneously appearing ground , why is this cluttered area there? And it doesn't seem to be due to any logically intrinsic to that forest Infrastructural activity of previous human genetations.....
And how old does it looks like ( that cluttered space )?
 
Last edited:
I thought you were looking for a compact container/ container where you said you were 1 foot down and had dug 3 feet × 3 feet wide.
I dont use detectors but I used to have 1 and the Pendulum would 90 % corroborate all results.

If i clearly understand your question, Yes your detector would probably discern between the 2 metals even within one compact spot but that doesn't mean that your detector is " not considering " what's next and around this spot at least within a very close proximity, and it doesn't mean what's around is not reinforcing at least by 30 % ( by different. Situation cases ) where Your detector AND THEN You think this spot is. The most enriched spot.....
The Pendulum also doesn't usually point to the greatest concentration of where Au and Ag are. ( or just 1 of the 2 ). It points/ swings to a very high concentration that IS THE ONE of probably SEVERAL concentrations within that 20 yards by 15 yards area AND HAPPENS to be physically closest to Where you stand.
Of you were standing and holding a pendulum.

In fact, for caches you should try to mentally override and ignore the highest Concentration/ strongest emanation Spot. Because that's natural Conglomeration of underground networks of the Noble elements.
The cache , especially if contemporarily hidden - say 1930s to 1970s, is where's the Suppressed signals Spot is.... Where ( and you might see part of this above ground ) the most cluttered immediate ground environments is. Where the stones are. And there might not even be any above ground, if a lot of pre'-planning was done on the part of the owner.

But broad Areas/ almost flat contemporary ridges are visible, where for example ground soil or other forest or human made materials were impressed, compressed into the ground for an area longer than say 3 or 4 feet lenght (say 8 or say 12 meters long gravel compressed into the ground alongside railroad tracks ( and maybe 15 to 20 meters sideways from the tracks) is Both luckily and at the same time may be for Deceptive measurement outcomes, producing Different emanation strengths for key elements or often All elements, somewhere not as Suppressed signal but also no more than 2/3 of swing lenght OF WHAT would have been produced by say of 250 grams copper compactly twisted old wires simply placed on top of that gravel ridge and basically.on top of the forest leafs.
* At probably most random points tested along the lenght of that 12 meters long slightly elevated gravel stripe.

In my experience, if I am standing in a wild field slope and there is 20 yards potential ground this way and 15 the other way.

So we need to look/ feel where the most cluttered say 3 feet by 5 feet area is. And find out Why out of a say 1/4 acre of a mixed new and old forest with Benign homogeneously appearing ground , why is this cluttered area there? And it doesn't seem to be due to any logically intrinsic to that forest Infrastructural activity of previous human genetations.....
And how old does it looks like ( that cluttered space )?
So I was reading my own writing above here. It's not clear what the 8 meters to 12 meters long gravel suppressed into the ground, at a distance of 15-20 meters from RR tracks Is...

Well it is something where There is nothing of interest!
Just avoid it!
How do you decide to eliminate it? Usually by testing 3 to 5 random different points across this gravel ( enmeshed with soil ) and they all.prettu much.produce An Average strenght signal.... Therefore avoid it!
Look for a smaller say 3 by 5 feet or 6 by 10 feet that's also cluttered
BUT IS IN MIDST of a part of wilderness where its all The same/ flat. No cluttered ground.

Look for the small patch of cluttered blanket.- There might be something. Gray color signals especially will be Below average ar even Almost very very weak!
But you have to focus your eyes and mind on every spot of land for at least 6 or 7 seconds or even 12 seconds if you are just gaining experience since recently.


...
You should look
 
GPS only

I have GPS only.
Ok

If you send me the GPS coords from the picture where i mark the Treasure i can get the GPS coords of the Treasure then you can go to the site and arrive with GPS to the suspicious area and put 3 spots with soda cans:
1 can spot, 2 cans spot, 3 cans spot ..the cans glued together with tape

Then you take a picture from the cans area and published here so i can search the Treasure spot to dig ..:headbang:
 

Attachments

  • CansTriangulation.webp
    CansTriangulation.webp
    8.5 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:
Ok

If you send me the GPS coords from the picture where i mark the Treasure i can get the GPS coords of the Treasure then you can go to the site and arrive with GPS to the suspicious area and put 3 spots with soda cans:
1 can spot, 2 cans spot, 3 cans spot ..the cans glued together with tape

Then you take a picture from the cans area and published here so i can search the Treasure spot to dig ..:headbang:
Okay, As quickly as I can.
 
ahk18, the depth i give to you is wrong
I check it again with a different method and i get 50cm of depth
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom