Uvalde,Tx 16 - 23Oct

Poll Closed

  • Closed

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Closed

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
These are descriptions from someone selling the actual cartridges (regarding the rimfire)... http://www.mcpheetersantiquemilitaria.com/06_ammunition/06_item_025.htm

.44 RIM FIRE LONG; lead bullet; hs “U”; introduced during the Civil War
.44 RIM FIRE EXTRA LONG; lead bullet; hs None; ca. 1870’s Ballard, Remington, F. Wesson Rifles

~~~

I also thought this was informative... http://www.shootingtimes.com/ammunition/st_0301_blackpowder/

Black Powder Magnums
Although the term "magnum" was not applied to cartridges until well into the 20th century,the quest for more power dates back to the birth of metallic cartridges.
By Mike Venturino


.44 Russ, .44 WCF .45 Colt
Magnum cartridges are an accepted part of today's shooting world, even to the point where many firearms and ammunition companies have developed their own lines of more powerful cartridges (witness the Ultra Mags from Remington and Winchester's Short Magnums). But the quest for more power from handguns and rifles is not new. It is as old as metallic cartridges themselves.

Back in the 1870s, in the first decade of centerfire, reloadable cartridges, various gun and ammunition companies also worked at ways of getting more powder under bullets. The term "magnum" as regards firearms had not yet been coined, but the effect was still the same. Focusing on the year 1878, mainly because I own a couple of firearms catalogs from that year, I'd like to show you what the biggest and most powerful cartridges were during the wildest time of the "Wild West."

Sixguns
Starting with revolvers, there were only two 1878 cartridges that achieved true power by our modern standards. First was the .45 Colt, introduced by that company in 1873 as a caliber for the venerable Single Action Army. Then came the .44 Winchester Centerfire (WCF), which we commonly call .44-40 today. It originated as a rifle round, albeit a very weak one, and was accommodated in revolvers by Colt in about 1877. (Some sources give 1878).

Before the advent of the .45 Colt in 1873, Smith & Wesson and Colt introduced several big-bore cartridges for use in their holster revolvers. For instance, there was the .44 S&W American, .44 S&W Russian, and .44 Colt. Also the .44 Henry Rimfire was adapted from lever guns for revolver use. None of these cartridges pushed a bullet in excess of 750 fps, and all would be considered pipsqueaks today.

I've had the opportunity to duplicate vintage loads in vintage revolvers chambered for all the calibers I've listed. Here are some specifics on one example. I pulled apart a handful of original .44 Colt blackpowder factory loads by UMC. They contained 21 grains of powder under a 208-grain lead bullet. I loaded those same bullets in fresh Starline brass (Dept. ST, 1300 W. Henry St., Sedalia, MO 65301; www.starlinebrass.com) charged with CCI 350 Large Pistol Magnum primers and carrying 21 grains of Goex FFg blackpowder. From the eight-inch barrel of a Colt Richards Conversion, that load chronographed only 742 fps.

.44 Henry Rimfire, .44 WCF, .45-75 WCF
Now imagine the impact the .45 Colt and .44 WCF cartridges must have had on handgun shooters of the 1870s. Some early .45 Colt factory loads carried as much as 40 grains of blackpowder under 250-grain bullets. That charge was quickly deemed too hot, and the factories thereafter loaded 35 grains. That load easily permitted velocities in excess of 900 fps from 7 1/2-inch barrel lengths. Factory .44 WCF loads used 200-grain bullets, but they contained a full 40-grain charge of blackpowder. Again from the 7 1/2-inch barrel of Colt SAAs, velocities passed 900 fps. These two handgun cartridges were the tops in their day. A look at the size of the .45 Colt and .44 WCF cases compared to the smaller rounds mentioned helps explain their power. The .45's case was 1.29 inches long, or the same as today's .357, .41, and .44 Magnums, and the .44-40's was a bit longer at 1.31 inches. The .44 S&W American case was only .91 inch, the .44 S&W Russian was .97 inch, and the .44 Colt and .45 S&W were only 1.10 inches. Colt chambered both of its super-powerful revolver cartridges of 1878 in the SAA and the then-new double-action Model 1878. Oddly enough, no other company made handguns for the .45 Colt cartridge (disregarding a few special test samples of Remington's Model 1875), but every manufacturer of holster-size handguns of the late 1800s chambered revolvers for .44 WCF.
...

~~~

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BTT/is_177_29/ai_n14816289/

Those are the lyrics from an old Marty Robbins song titled Mr. Shorty. It shows how intertwined the .44 caliber is with American legend and folklore. Since the beginning of cartridge-firing revolvers the .44 caliber has been in the forefront. Take the Colt Single Action Army for instance. Between 1873 and 1941 more were made in .45 Colt than any other single caliber, but look at how many different .44 caliber cartridges were offered. Colt SAAs were chambered for .44 WCF (.44-40), .44 Colt, .44 American, .44 Russian, .44 Special and the .44 Henry rimfire. In tact the first couple of Colt SAAs made for U.S. Government testing were in .44 Russian and .44 American calibers but the decision was made by the military to switch to .45s as the bore size for both long guns and handguns.

The second most prominent handgun manufacturer of the late 1800s was Smith & Wesson. Between 1870 and 1912 they sold over a quarter million of their large frame top break revolvers, collectively named the Model No. 3. The vast bulk of them were in .44 caliber. Those were split between .44 Henry rimfires, .44 Americans and .44 Russian; mostly the latter one. Then circa 1907 they introduced their first large frame revolver with a side-swing cylinder. Its premier chambering and the 20th century's first new .44 cartridge was the .44 S&W Special. Nearly 50 years later they followed it up with the ultimate .44--the .44 Remington Magnum.

History's Mystery

Although Colt and Remington used .44 caliber in their cap & ball revolvers, it was Smith & Wesson that got the ball rolling on .44 caliber metallic cartridges in 21870. And, they did it by chambering their first Model No. 3s for a Winchester "rifle" cartridge. Yes, I said rifle cartridge. That was the .44 Henry rimfire, and it was a mighty puny rifle cartridge, what with a 200 grain bullet with 23 to 28 grains of blackpowder. It had to be puny if a relatively weak top break handgun mechanism could safely hold it.
 

Nana40 said:
Woop!! I have treasures from the Uvalde hunt, and didn't even have to leave Alabama! :icon_pirat: My brand new Mighty AP digger and sheath arrived in the mail yesterday! Thanks a million TC and Bill!! :o That was so sweet of you two! I can't wait to go huntin' and try them out.
Ya'll post up those finds! Lovin' all the great pics and stories!! Scorpion Steve? .....Really? :-X :D You all just went wild in the desert, huh? I even heard a tale that there were monkeys in the trees there! :D

I didn't see any monkeys but there were snakes in them thar trees. I seed pictographs of them.
 

Stagecoach - the monkeys were seen on wednesday at the 2200 acre Agape ranch.They were in a tree on the next ranch on the other side of the high fence near where we entered through the gate.
 

Great info on the casings...gonna have to look at mine and see what I have...WSD, the date on that 20 centavo Mexican coin was 1943...I'll try to get some pics up before I leave for DIV in Virginia on Wed....also got a 1916 Wheatie in change yesterday!
baggins
 

If there are any snakes in Caldwell I,m hiding behind WSD . I hate snakes !!!!!!! I'ii taste on fried up tho . Im brave :o. I,ll make it to Caldwell If I have to Hitch Hike Dang it. Glad everybody made it home . I was praying for all of you. goldie
 

What's holding you up,RR?Old River?Cyber,where's that ring from the old corral?
 

That's right! Y'all had your good time and now it's up to you to show us your goodies! Pleeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaase!!!!!!....?
 

The Beep Goes On said:
That's right! Y'all had your good time and now it's up to you to show us your goodies! Pleeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaase!!!!!!....?

Ditto.
 

More pictures please;

Steve, how 'bout a few close ups of that ring you found. Anybody find silver besides 'ol Albert?
 

Regarding the cartridge, I knew most of that and that was my point. In the old west it was popular to own a rifle and handgun in .44 WCF so the ammo was interchangable. That way they didn't have to carry around two different kinds of ammo. Now days however you are liable to find a box of .44-40 ammo labled "Rifle Only" because with the advent of smokeless powder they were able to increase the presssure to a point that they may not be safe in one of the old handguns. Cousins of the old WCF is the .38-40. It uses the same basic case only necked down to .38 caliber.At little Big Horn, the Indians had several fast firing .44 WCF rifles while Custer's command only had breach loading single shot rifles in .45-70. The Indians won so handily because they were at close range and had a much faster rate of fire than Custer's troops. If they had fought the Indians at 200 to 300 yards the old single shot rifles would have had the edge due to their longer range and more power. Just an "amusing anecdote" as my wife likes to say. :D Monty
And there are plenty of snakes in Caldwell, they just hide better! Kansas snakes are just sneakier for some reason. Just ask Burdie and Snoopy. Monty
 

Old River made a separate post under 'Uvalde' with pics of his finds.
 

Monty said:
Regarding the cartridge, I knew most of that and that was my point. In the old west it was popular to own a rifle and handgun in .44 WCF so the ammo was interchangable. That way they didn't have to carry around two different kinds of ammo. Now days however you are liable to find a box of .44-40 ammo labled "Rifle Only" because with the advent of smokeless powder they were able to increase the presssure to a point that they may not be safe in one of the old handguns. Cousins of the old WCF is the .38-40. It uses the same basic case only necked down to .38 caliber.At little Big Horn, the Indians had several fast firing .44 WCF rifles while Custer's command only had breach loading single shot rifles in .45-70. The Indians won so handily because they were at close range and had a much faster rate of fire than Custer's troops. If they had fought the Indians at 200 to 300 yards the old single shot rifles would have had the edge due to their longer range and more power. Just an "amusing anecdote" as my wife likes to say. :D Monty
And there are plenty of snakes in Caldwell, they just hide better! Kansas snakes are just sneakier for some reason. Just ask Burdie and Snoopy. Monty

We like 'amusing anecdotes' Monty :icon_thumright:
 

warsawdaddy said:
What's holding you up,RR?Old River?Cyber,where's that ring from the old corral?
Sorry...... been busy.
Well, I found some smashed bullets and later model cartridges, along with a LOT of random metal pieces, including a bent cinch buckle for a saddle, but I didn't photog them cause they looked pretty much like everyone else's junk..... :dontknow:
I only kept the following finds:
Camper eating utensil * medal from TX Art Ed Assoc * Stainless steel ring * metal throwing star * small rodeo buckle * threaded cap nut * misc quarters, dimes and pennies including 3 Wheaties (1941,1950,1955).
The top 5 dimes are bent up from being in the gravel drive at Neal's.
The upper group of pennies are damaged and/or decayed.......
 

Attachments

  • 1.webp
    1.webp
    53.9 KB · Views: 509
  • 2.webp
    2.webp
    46.2 KB · Views: 513
  • 3.webp
    3.webp
    66.8 KB · Views: 493
  • 4.webp
    4.webp
    53.6 KB · Views: 490
  • 5.webp
    5.webp
    33.7 KB · Views: 511
Something else I saw that was cool:
A tree was growing out from between the rock layers on this escarpment and pushing them apart. That's one tough tree!!!
10958_22_10_10_7_55_17_0.jpeg
 

Very nice Cybercop! and nice hunting with you! Cool finds and pics (thank you :notworthy: :notworthy: )!
 

Lots of good finds there.are you sure about the 'throwing knife'?Looks like it could be from a spur?Viking of course.
 

Well WSD, since a standard spur rowel is 1 to 1.5" across, and the one I found is 4.5", the gigantic Viking who wore it would not scare me nearly as much as the horse he would be riding........ :o

huge_horse.webp
 

Wish I could have taken better pics at the hunt MG, but all I had was a cell phone camera...... Thanks tho.
 

For those MDers who couldn't come, you might want to ask WSD who got the garter on this hunt....eh? :hello2: :laughing7:

Seriously though, I think this hunt was a huge success. We didn't find the gold, but we did find a lot of "interesting items", especially one.... ahem... and that will go unnamed. LOL THIS is why I get so po'd at local/state/fed govt getting their greedy fingers into stupid laws about protecting buried "artifacts for future generations". During our hunt, we got to learn history.....we got to dig our fingers into soil where settlers had fought the Indianas......we got to see and touch arrowheads and scraping tools........we got to FEEL what history is all about!!!!!!!!!!!! Instead, the govt would much rather the items deteriorate into rust or dust.......and what good does that do for future generations? And, with this current administration in power, who is to say that we won't be the last generation?

Thanks to people like Burdie, WSD, RR and others, we get a chance to EXPERIENCE what history is all about. And, to top it off, we get a chance to gather in some great friendships. Sitting around, eating rattlesnake..........and roasting marshmallows with TC's family. And then, to top it off, I got to mark off one item on my "Bucket List".......to underwater MD. Now THAT was a HIGH!! :headbang: :headbang:

Folks, this is what LIFE should be about.......EXPLORING the unknown.......FINDING the unknown. Gee, what if we couldn't have landed on the moon because it had to be preserved for "future generations"... :icon_pirat: :icon_pirat:

I truly have enjoyed the hunts, WSD/Burdie/RR...........and hope for many more to come.
Mel

borninok
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom