What was this object used for?
Thanks
Thanks
DigEmAll said:I did a very little bit of research... it really didn't take long... and came up with this history.
Its development as a weapon supposedly grew out of the moratorium on edged weaponry under the Satsuma daimyo due to their restrictive policy of weapons control after invading Okinawa in the 17th century. (Some maintain that the weapon was most likely conceived and used exclusively for that end, as the configuration of actual flails and bits are unwieldy for weapons use, not to mention the fact that peasant farmers were unlikely to train for 'improvised' combat against professional warriors.)The modern nunchaku has been modified for its use as a weapon and would make a relatively ineffective rice flail.
The nunchaku as a weapon has surged in popularity since martial artist Bruce Lee used it in his movies in the 1970s. It is generally considered by martial artists to be a limited weapon. Complex and difficult to wield, the nunchaku lacks the range of the bo (quarterstaff) and the edged advantage of a sword or sai. It is also prone to inflicting injury on its user. Nevertheless, the nunchaku's impressive motion in use and perceived lethality contributed to its increasing popularity, peaking in the 1980s, perhaps due to its (unfounded) association with ninjas during the 1980s ninja craze.
diving doc said:Okay, then let's take a look at this as though it was a small personal camping tool, something to do with its design, and see if we can't come up with a picture. From the manufacture I'm guessing the end of the 19th or the begining of the 20th. I don't think that this object can seriously be considered to be a part of an offensive weapon given its size and mass.
Doc
DigEmAll said:I don't think it would be heavy enough hardware to hold a bag of food or trash while camping. Besides, most people would use a rope over a limb so it could be raised and lowered when the need arises.
dg39 said:Nope, check out the web site. In the middle of the swamps.
DigEmAll said:Let's take a step back and look at what it does and doesn't accomplish.
1. You either have to be able to access the acorn to make it extend the spikes, or use centrifigal force to extend them. WHY? What does this accomplish? (To propel it into sleeve. Spikes expand to hold prop.)...
2. Someone went to the trouble of either making it gripable or making it look like an acorn. Why? What does this do ? And too, why make it gripable on only one side of it? The hull is smooth. (for show by magician)
3. It will not function in an item such as a pipe. You can't touch it to extend the spikes. (they only expand when propeled into sleeve)
4. It's not really a heavy duty item. (Has to be light to use as a trick prop)
5. Why would someone create an item with spikes hidden inside? Why would they make it look like an acorn? (For show)
6. Where are acorns found? Nobody would want an acorn looking thingie in Hawaii where there are no acorns. There they would make it look like a macademia nut... or a pineapple or coffee bean. LOL (Mostly in the south and east US)
Anyone have any other questions? Let's see if this can help. SOMEWHERE on this WWW there is an exact picture and ID of this thing... we just aren't looking in the right direction!!!
SWR said:That area appears to have been digitally altered. Also, you can now see the elusive third hole behind the plunger.
I'm not sure of anything, never was.diving doc said:bigcypresshunter said:We may not have to look any further.. I like the acorn infuser idea.
Why the spikes then, and why so few holes?? And what about those pricks and springs
Are you still sure?
Doc