Blindbowman
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,068
- Reaction score
- 1,005
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #281
Thread Owner
no in fact I would believe it is to the word .. we know there is gold and silver in these areas but finding it is a whole other story as you well know and so do I ... if they had great wealth they would not have made it known .. but I fully agree with what his over sight is .. and I dose again prove what I am saying the best way to locate the site is from the south headed northward and when you reach the site your on a mountain where mountains surround the site .I do say he maybe over the number of houses at this site but as they were destroyed I can not know a true count of them ..after being at this site and knowing how hard it is to find any evidence out in the open . I would say he is right on the money and did a fair job describing the events now I don't know about the other cities and I stated that from the start .. but I do believe this is what was called Cibola ...what the Indian called it was up to them ...but yes I am 100% positive this is the real Cibola what ever it is now it was back then far more ..Not to derail the discussion, but in defense of the Spanish and their treatment of the natives - consider this; the Pima rebellion of 1751. In this case the Pimas deliberately went after the padres, and several actually fled to the supposedly brutal Spaniards and begged them to protect them from the wrath of the padres! Also several Jesuits complained of "their" Indians running away from the missions to go work for the Spanish and thus "learning every sin". One padre complained that even if he could find the runaway Indians, it was almost impossible to entice them to return to the missions! Remember these missions were run as a business, four days of each week were forced labor for the Indians and to refuse meant starving, beatings with the whip and or the stocks. An English visitor to a Franciscan mission in California in the 1770s was shocked at the brutal treatment of the Indians by the padres, and the idea of the poor Indian being forced to kiss the hand of the padre who ordered him to be whipped was particularly disturbing.
Blindbowman I take it then that you believe Coronado was mistaken in his visit and assault on Cibola? For those whom have not read Coronado's official report it is online (free) at:
https://www.pbs.org/weta/thewest/resources/archives/one/corona8.htm
Coronado was convinced he had found Cibola, and that it was a complete BS tale made up by friar Marcos de Niza. Are you saying that Coronado was wrong, and that the seven cities of Cibola are located in the Superstitions? Thanks in advance.
Coffee anyone?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()