Silver Searcher
Gold Member
I have put a 100 year age to this thread because I don't class modern Gold rings as treasure...Sorry. This is my oldest, found 2009 childs Roman Gold 8)
SS
Attachments
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Fog said:I found this ring during the first 2 weeks of owning a detector. I had no idea what I was doing, I heard a beep and I dug! (which is pretty much what I still do now 2 years later.) It was 10 inches down, I looked at my buddy (Brian W, he just started posting stuff here as well.) and said, hey I found a ring do you think this could be real? ( I was clueless, it wasn't tainted or tarnished, wiped the dust away and it was beaming.) He looked at the depth of the hole, looked at me, and said it was pretty much a given! I thought I could see some writing on the inside, but I'm afflicted with OFS (over 40 syndrome), and didn't have my glasses, ( I have to confirm with him when I find something to see if its a GW button or a flat washer.) he said "it's a name."
It was great to find a name with middle initial. I figured that in a fairly small town it shouldn't pose a problem to research.... wrong. I didn't even know if it was old or had just been turned under from farming. I took the ring to a jeweler and as soon as she looked at it she said, Oh my, It's georgian! Which meant nothing to me, until she said georgian period! Now I had a time frame to start digging into. One thing that struck me odd was how small the diameter of the ring was, it barely fit on my pinky. Later I would come to learn people were of smaller stature, living was hard, and there weren't many drive-thru's.
It took weeks of eliminating names from ancestory web sites, e-mails to knowledgeable folk, and then the confirming piece to nail it down without doubt was an image I found on the web while researching antique rings (posted below). the ring was owned by Moody P. Noyes born 2/13/1767, he married Anna Pike of Haverhill 1/24/1793 they had 13 children. Moody, Betsy, Theodore, Colonel Leonard W., Simeon N., Mary T, Thomas J., John L., George W, Almira, caroline and Nancy E.
The family owned Jeweler who made the ring are still in business today although they are now owned by Towle Silver. The ring was made during the first years of the jewelers operation and would have been made by the first silversmith. I decided to continue research to see if I could find the closest living descendant to give the ring back to. I never realized what a daunting task that would be, between poor record keeping, lines daughtering out, and families having 13 kids it was soon realized by simple math there could be over 1,000 names!
I ended up finding the e-mail address of a man that helped write a book called "The Noyes Descendants vol. II" and via e-mail he confirmed that all my research was correct, except he said there could be well over 5,000 names by now. I was kind of bummed out because the initial thought of what it would be like to give something like this back to the rightful owners would be something. But for now it sits with the things I've been gathering from cellar holes, and fields. I hope poor old Moody didn't take too much flack from the wife.
HH
Silver Searcher said:sorry I bored you going over old ground but I wanted those who don't know our Treasure laws, what a complete waist of time it is.CRUSADER said:Silver Searcher said:I know it won't please you ....but never againCRUSADER said:Silver Searcher said:I wouldn't I have just recieved a letter today from the BM, about my Gold Stirrup ring, 16 months after I declared it and now I have to wait until 21/10/2010 before the valuation commitee sits........shockingmile-ender said:Personally, I'd love it if the museums here took more of an interest...Iron Patch said:MY RING is in with all my other treasure, here at home. Sucks to be U! ...as in UK'ers!
SS
That's because of that big hoard jumping the queue.
Personally, I would complain that the are not sticking to the 12 month guidelines that they published. Keep pushing & they will buckle. Happen to me.
SS
Personal choice, I'm not one to judge.
All I can repeat, is that, if you were to sell it privately you are unlikely to ever achieve the valuations (in my experience & many others I know). ie. the best that can happen, if you like to sell is that they want it & pay the valuation. Everyones a winner in my books. You get the money, museum gets the find & more importantly the information for future study. Anyway, all been said before, so must be boring now
I totally agree that the wait is completely unacceptable & has made even me mad in the past.
SS
mile-ender said:Personally, I'd love it if the museums here took more of an interest...Iron Patch said:MY RING is in with all my other treasure, here at home. Sucks to be U! ...as in UK'ers!
A very nice ring with some nice open work SilverMuddyhandz said:Some real nice rings here!
Well, I do have a lot of rings from the fur trade that are very old and valuable but I think I will pick out something different. This ring is not even from the fur trade but it is Victorian and is in mint condition. This silver ring was found at an extremely hunted out park (Assiniboine park) about 4 years ago. The park was made over 100 years ago and it had no trees in it's beginning. Thinking outside the box, I headed into the bushes and found a good handful of old coins and this ring. I haven't been able to figure out what the stone is but it is really nice. Almost turquoise-like. The ring is stamped sterling.
I certainly have more rings to post, but I have always liked this one and wanted to show it first. I think I will post my fur trade ones in that section of this forum.
Cheers,
Dave.
I would agree also over 100 years....nice 8)ppratt said:I pretty sure this is over 100 years old everything I found there was also
And personel proberbly made by the farther of the child which makes it more specialBuckleBoy said:Child-sized ring made from a silver coin. c.1840-60
Simple, crudely-made, and beautiful. Dug by Rodeo Recon.
Silver Searcher said:And personel proberbly made by the farther of the child which makes it more specialBuckleBoy said:Child-sized ring made from a silver coin. c.1840-60
Simple, crudely-made, and beautiful. Dug by Rodeo Recon.
SS
Iron Patch said:My other 2, can anyone put a maker and date on them?
RPG said:Iron Patch said:My other 2, can anyone put a maker and date on them?
1982. Just a guess.
Iron Patch said:I think the second might be early 1900s, and the first older. Both finds involved weird circumstances, weird enough to tell me that I probably wouldn't find much gold...and that has been very true.
BuckleBoy said:Iron Patch said:I think the second might be early 1900s, and the first older. Both finds involved weird circumstances, weird enough to tell me that I probably wouldn't find much gold...and that has been very true.
Do tell...
Nice rings looks like some stones are missing from the first onepepperj said:The first one is marked Solid Gold, the silver one was found 32yrs ago. It the hall marks on the outside of the band-till the jeweler did a repair and filled them.