What's new

real or fake?

moundbuilder

Full Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
157
Reaction score
34
Golden Thread
0
Location
Mercersburg, Ohio
Detector(s) used
Minelab Explorer SE White's XL Pro Treasure Mate Pinpointer Nikon
???
 

Attachments

  • bw.webp
    bw.webp
    36.9 KB · Views: 245
Upvote 0
moundbuilder said:

I don't know if it is real. I do know that it is not one of those gift shop reproductions. It is far too detailed to be one of those.
 
Did you find it or buy it? If you bought it and know not where it was found it could be anything now days. If you found it I would say real.
 
Hope it's real. Nice! May be a Stringtown ?
 
Last edited:
It is hard enough to tell on many color photos if an artifact is fake, it is close to impossible to tell if an artifact is fake by a black and white photo unless it is an extremely poor reproduction..... Many use acid baths to give it fake patina...

Try tasting it with your tounge, if it tastes salty is a very good chance it's a fake using acid bath. (Exception being you just found it at a salt water beach...LOL)
 
It is hard enough to tell on many color photos if an artifact is fake, it is close to impossible to tell if an artifact is fake by a black and white photo unless it is an extremely poor reproduction..... Many use acid baths to give it fake patina...

Try tasting it with your tounge, if it tastes salty is a very good chance it's a fake using acid bath. (Exception being you just found it at a salt water beach...LOL)
Very good info I never knew you could do that. I guess I will be licking points for now on before I buy them. or not lol. Unless it is a very good repro you can usually tell by the feel of the point at least I can anyway.
 
Hard to tell from photo's, even harder to tell from a single photo. If you're asking for help, why did you post a modern, black and white picture????
 
I should also say I don't see anything exceptionally alarming about it, other than the fact that it's a modern black and white picture with no background on the find.
 
It's almost impossible to say from just grainy photo. I don't understand why people do this. They post one photo at a bad angle and expect people to determine good or bad. Show multiple photos from all angles and we can get a better idea of whether it's good or not.
 
better photo

It's almost impossible to say from just grainy photo. I don't understand why people do this. They post one photo at a bad angle and expect people to determine good or bad. Show multiple photos from all angles and we can get a better idea of whether it's good or not.
Here's a better photo.
 

Attachments

  • 5295_100472703299388_2710448_n.webp
    5295_100472703299388_2710448_n.webp
    41.4 KB · Views: 149
Thanks but how bout front and back and a side view? A point with that much going for it should have more than just 1 pic with it.
 
Are the edges really sharp? Looks hardaway-ish still something looks strange about it to fresh looking in my opinion.. what's the story behind it? Found? Did you buy it? Go have it carbon dated. Need more pictures need to see that base and the edges also backside

Johnathan Griswold
 
Last edited:
Are the edges really sharp? Looks hardaway-ish still something looks strange about it to fresh looking in my opinion.. what's the story behind it? Found? Did you buy it? Go have it carbon dated. Need more pictures need to see that base and the edges also backside

Johnathan Griswold

thanks, the edges are sharp enough to cut a sirloin. It looks really clean and fresh, too but I think it's real. I found it along with a cache of Cahokia points in Kentucky. The field was just plowed. I'm waiting for the papers from a well-known authenticator and will have the flint carbon dated if he rejects it. The farmer's son said it looked like a Ft. Payne Greenbrier. The Cahokias it was found in association with were all made from obsidian and all are for sell. Sorry for the photos, it won't let me upload better pics. I also found this un-notched Clovis on the same site. 6 5/8" x 1 5/8"5295_100472449966080_5986144_n.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you found that yourself in a freshly plowed field...why are you asking if it is real..then giving a sales pitch????? And also radio carbon dating is only going to tell you the age of the stone itself not when it was chipped into shape.
 
It is hard enough to tell on many color photos if an artifact is fake, it is close to impossible to tell if an artifact is fake by a black and white photo unless it is an extremely poor reproduction..... Many use acid baths to give it fake patina...

Try tasting it with your tounge, if it tastes salty is a very good chance it's a fake using acid bath. (Exception being you just found it at a salt water beach...LOL)

I tasted it and it tastes like dirt. Here is the in-situ of photo of when I plowed the cache to the surface.250359_492707094075945_725672056_n.webp
 
I hope the moderators put a stop to this crap. It may taste like dirt but it smells like....
 
I hope the moderators put a stop to this crap. It may taste like dirt but it smells like....
Seriously? That's mean, Gator Boy. What did I do? Here's a better picture. :( 5295_100472823299376_7632293_n.webp
 
That was the G rated version
 
moundbuilder said:
Seriously? That's mean, Gator Boy. What did I do? Here's a better picture. :( <img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=687007"/>

Is this a joke?

Johnathan Griswold
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom