sgtfda
Bronze Member
Sorry Wayne!
Hopefully you guys are on to something significant. Dozens of others have believed the same thing over the years and decades - quite a few have tooted about it on this very forum. Perhaps you should wait for some verifiable confirmation before the big announcement.
Sorry Wayne!
"Why not just explain in one brief post, exactly how to read the stones?"
Hal;
Like any map, you read them by orientating yourself according to what you see on the map.
Mostly this has to be done in the field, where things can be seen in perspective, relative to where they are placed on the stones themselves.
I can't put it any more briefly than that.
Regards:SH.
This is purely my own personal opinion, based on what I've seen of the Stone Maps and read about them and I believe the two Stone Maps ( DON Heart-Cross) currently in the Superstition Mountain Historical Society Museum (SMHSM), are not the original stones.
It is undisputed that Travis Tumlinson was first to possess the Stone Maps. It is also undisputed that Clarence Mitchell, obtained those same Stone Maps from the widow of Tumlinson after he passed away.
Clarence Mitchell aka. Travis Marlowe, wrote a book based on those Stone Maps in 1964 titled Superstition Treasures, University of California Press 64 pages.
In that book Mitchell/Marlowe details how Tumlinson said he found the Stone Maps, and how he (Mitchell/Marlowe) came into possession of them from Tumlinson's widow.
Of most interest in that book are several very clear and detailed photographs of the Stone Maps both front and back. Photos taken by Mitchell/Marlowe shortly after he acquired the Stone Maps from Mrs. Tumlinson about 1960-1963 time period.
If you look closely at those photos, examine them in detail, and look closely, comparing them to the Stone Maps in the SMHS Museum, you will see they are not the same Stone Maps. (I am talking about the two, DON and Heart, Cross maps, not the Priest and Horse map.) Several glaring differences can be easily noted.
I believe the Museum Stones were most probably made as copies and may have been manufactured with modern equipment or tooling.
In Mitchell/Marlowe's book, he explains in detail he has in his possession an affidavit from a professor of a leading California University stating the Stone Maps he acquired from Tumlinson are authentic, and without question at least 100 years old.
Mitchell's reference to the professor stating the Stones being at least 100 years old is the basis for the stories that the FBI examined the stones and stated they were at least 100 years old. There is no record the FBI examined the stones as they would have had no reason to examine them. Stories circulated over the years that Mitchell's Corporation (MOEL) filed bankruptcy and was tried for defrauding investors using the Stones are simply not true. Neither account ever happened.
Once again, this is merely my own opinion based on a comparison of the Stones in Mitchell/Marlowe's book and the Stones currently in the SMHS Museum.
Matthew K. Roberts
Matthew I'm sure your aware that many colts were made.maybe the original was kept and a copy was left at the museum.I held copy in my hand from a friend Roy Touch.hope I spelled it right.all the information you need are coded on the stones to give you a chance to locate the treasures.good luck
Tom
Wayne
I will be hiding out in the Horse until it gets cooler....Awaiting your arrival in October!
View attachment 809477
Stay cool....May the Gods keep the wolves in the hills and the women in our beds....
Best:Wayne
i read a book once, about a contractor from chicago i think, a lady hired him to look for the lost dutchman mine, been a long time so i dont remember the details, but remember it was a good book, can't find a copy to save my life now, and i am pretty good at finding stuff, maybe it was in this thread but i didnt read the whole thing, the book was called SKELETON GOLD
THanx,it may not show up because it may not have been deemed credible, i dont remember where they got their information, but he searched hands on, boots on the ground for several years and ended up at some cement that he couldnt get through, it dealt with a lot of landmarks-that he found-he was getting his equipment and personel in with a helicopter, they would hoover and throw there stuff out then jump out themselves,i remember some of the landmarks, the old stone house,the face that looks up at the mine, the canon de fresca (fresh canyon), and he also found lookout post's carved high in the cliff's that he was not looking for,but would lay credibility to the peralta family once mining there,
last night after i posted i remembered that i checked this book out from a library that has since burned down but i do know where they would have taken the books that didn't burn am going there now
Mr. Ribaudo,
So is discrediting the integrity of the Historical Society your idea of being a good friend? Like I said if the historical society does not disown you and what you did they are worse than you are.
Is publishing private e-mails your idea of being honest when you realize that such an act is a breach of the most basic decency. And furthermore you published these e-mails and slandered some fine folks knowing that you were being dis-honest. You see what you relied on is that we would not stoop to your level and I am proud we did not.
And what is sad is you continue to lie.
No Mr. Ribaudo I do not attack your integrity I simply reveal it for what it is. You are a man when caught red-handed could not even admit he is wrong and say so.
Late used to think a lot of you. He defended you with others and hoped that something positive would come of all of this. You rewarded him and others with a continual stream of lies and deceit.
B.