- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 517
- Reaction score
- 452
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Absolutely!"G". Your assumption about resistive coils is not correct.
What I was trying to convey was about the resistive nature of soil at any one given point, time, and ambient. In other words, you cannot assume lower resistive coil measurement means or implies that there is any type of "thingy" between the measurement rods. Over a large statistical area, soil resistivity tends to be within a given range. This doesn't infer that over a small statistical area, the soil resistivity is constant. As I implied, even a foot or so displacement, can make a rather large change (up or down) in soil resistivity. Relaying on such a measurement as an indication of a treasure lying between the probes, is pure folly.
All of the soils in the world are different. They have too many differences to list them here. But allow me to show the proof! I am both right and wrong! You are both right and wrong! Here's why!
Soil has different composition from one place to another. It has different resistivity from one place to another! The resistivity is different... But... the difference falls within a range of resistivities. The range of resistivities is different from one place to another! But... within the area of interest, resistivities are within a measurable "normal" for that area. Maybe 100 to 10,000 ohms (ohm-meters). It depends on the natural variables that contribute to the resistivites.
I have attached for reference a graph of a line of resistivity for a survey near Aniak, Alaska. It (the red line) shows continuous variation greater than ninety (90) and it's off scale. The scale only goes up to 90.
We are looking for conductors having resistivities less than 90.
Each horizontal pixel in each graph represents 12 feet (one sample). Each graph covers 1000 samples. There are three graphs * 1000 samples * 12 feet = 36,000 feet of survey...

The resistivities (red line) are greater than 90.
- Geowizard
Last edited:












