- #41
Thread Owner
Yep, that's what I thought you were shoveling!Yup, and not a single one of them own a shovel. So what's your angle, since you don't own a shovel?

Yep, that's what I thought you were shoveling!Yup, and not a single one of them own a shovel. So what's your angle, since you don't own a shovel?

It was named for the fur stashes, known in French as Caches, not an English word! Right? LOL How did you Improvise that in a Stampeed?[The territorial legislature created a large Cache County in 1856. Eight years later, the legislators split off the eastern part of the county to form Richland (now Rich) County.]
Cache County
Cache County, located at the northern edge of Utah, is a land of mountains and a green, fertile valley. The Wasatch Mountains border the county on the east, and a spur of the Wasatch, the…ilovehistory.utah.gov
What?It was named for the fur stashes, known in French as Caches, not an English word! Right? LOL How did you Improvise that in a Stampeed?
Because I used the keys to decipher them. And no one else has. First, they will be verified by someone in the correct field of cryptography. One of the main items in the ciphers is the grave of the men he buried sometime before the box was given to Morriss.Still waiting on why your "solve" is correct vs. all the other solves here.
When are you going to dig up the treasure and prove to everyone why your "solve" was correct on the fictional code?
So your “solve” is no different than Franklin’s.Because I used the keys to decipher them. And no one else has. First, they will be verified by someone in the correct field of cryptography. One of the main items in the ciphers is the grave of the men he buried sometime before the box was given to Morriss.
It seems to me there are three ways to solve the ciphers.Because I used the keys to decipher them. And no one else has. First, they will be verified by someone in the correct field of cryptography. One of the main items in the ciphers is the grave of the men he buried sometime before the box was given to Morriss.
BTW, decoder is posted only helps with method #1.It seems to me there are three ways to solve the ciphers.
1. Method used on DOI:
correctly numbering the correct document and version, then you may need a key/offset to break the Caesar cipher followed by shifting left and right to adjust for mistakes made during numbering. This would produce the EXACT intended message.
2. Frequency analysis:
since multiple numBers were used for the same letter, this would need to be an iterative process best performed by a computer and probably tried by many.
I don't believe the decoded message will result in the EXACT message written by TB and why one might think they have solved it but not specific enough to start digging.
3. Decoding the Alphabetical strings:
these strings are intentional and could mean Cipher 1 was made up. They could also be the first clue to solving the ciphers.
Maybe they are keys,
maybe the decoded strings provide the name or initials of the correct document,
maybe they reveal the numbering sequence for the document, etc.
This could launch a series of clues leading one to the EXACT message. If so, I don't think it is TB who left these clues but the pamphlet author providing entertainment for his readers.
JohnnyRev, I've read your posts and it sounds like you followed a series of clues to your "solve". Does your effort fall into one of the three mentioned or is there a fourth?
-CO
What's your time frame on this?First, they will be verified by someone in the correct field of cryptography.
Time will tell! Keep your eyes open!So your “solve” is no different than Franklin’s.
Both Franklin and you claim to have “solved” the code yet neither have been able to show treasure.
Oh I have solved and do own a shovel...What I need is the correct approach to the land owner...I had in the beginning of possible 3 spots. The first land owner wanted $100,000 to step foot on their land and 3/4's of what I found. That was not a financial option for myself. I took more time and defined it down to one spot requiring access from a different land owner and now the quandary began...how do you approach without losing most of it? Can anyone answer that?Yup, and not a single one of them own a shovel. So what's your angle, since you don't own a shovel?
Oh I am 100% certain it's real...know who put it where it is...pretty sure I know why he did it...A scan is definite...50/50 is what I want...the problem is the money up front...Still taking care of a family, not much extra to give and my time on this earth is limited...TJB said the game was worth the candle and he was right so far...How certain are you the treasure actually exists, and that your solution is correct? $10,000 certain? $1,000 certain? $100 certain? I would write up a contract that offers cash up front just for the right to go onto the property and do non-invasive probing/scanning; if the probes/scans are positive, you have the right to excavate up to a certain area, and if the treasure is found you will split it 50/50. Something along those lines. You will not get in for free, I'm very certain of that.
Sounds like you don't really have a shovel.the problem is the money up front
Seams like I spent all my money on the shovel, but that's not stopping me...granted they may want money it but will be the after affect...Sounds like you don't really have a shovel.
What if I have found that one person who hasn't heard of the Beale Treasuse and has not had any request to get on their land?The property owners in Bedford county have had a long history of people trespassing and doing night digs. Most of them don't believe the legend is true and aren't going to agree to anyone coming on their property unless there is cash up front, because that's all the cash they're likely to ever see. If you don't have the cash, then find an investor who does.
In Bedford County? I'd say they also own a unicorn. If you have found that person, then go for it.What if I have found that one person who hasn't heard of the Beale Treasuse and has not had any request to got on their land?