Please go to my website to view this amazing coin. If you can offer any assistance in identifying its origins, I would be most grateful.
www.mysterycoin.com
www.mysterycoin.com
Silver Searcher said:Here's a interesting link :P it also puts johnnyi's wine theory back into it
http://www.jesusfamilytomb.com/back_to_basics/alternative/secret_symbols_IHS.htm
SS
johnnyi said:Helpful and interesting SS, but I have changed my mind on the wine theory as I mentioned earlier. Your link does though mention Monstrance. If you scan the word and search images you find a variety of inserts, one of which we may be what we're looking at here.
Just Google the word Vickievastik said:johnnyi said:Helpful and interesting SS, but I have changed my mind on the wine theory as I mentioned earlier. Your link does though mention Monstrance. If you scan the word and search images you find a variety of inserts, one of which we may be what we're looking at here.
Johhnyi,
How do I scan the word to search for the images?
Thanks!
Vickie
I thought IHS was a given since MJ mentioned it back on reply #3, like you said.johnnyi said:Having learned from Germany last week that what first appeared to me to be "I I I S" is actually a well known (over there) monogram "I H S" which is Latin for "Jesus savior of men" (somethig Jim immediately pointed out early on, and which I'd missed) , I retract any guess that this is associated with wine bottle or other bottle that is not directly associated with a church memento.
bigcypresshunter said:................,
I am leaning toward one of my original theories of a mid 20th century book medallion. But I dont know why it would need to be scored on the backside.![]()
I just meant that if it was a book, (porous) it should stick, or stay stuck. It must have been glued to something non-porous like ceramic or glass to feel the need to score it. In other words, I dont see the need to score the backside to stick to a book, unless the glue was poor or wrong type. But maybe Im guessing too much here with the scoring.trikikiwi said:bigcypresshunter said:................,
I am leaning toward one of my original theories of a mid 20th century book medallion. But I dont know why it would need to be scored on the backside.![]()
IMHO;
the back of this, scored so crudely; someone liked the look of it where it was, before it fell off.
I can imagine - there was an attempt to re-attach it, with the original back, possibly. Then it fell off again, then the crude cross hatching is either a seriously, devious treasure map, or an amateurish attempt to make the B-----y Glue stick, this time
As I say, in my humble opinion.
Cheers, Mike
It is not Medievel, but it still needs identified, unless you know what it is. Most of us lost interest with the wild speculation video.Rando said:Three pages?
really?
![]()
Here's a bit more, early German Gold Ducatvastik said:Indeed! There is some good research going on here folks
I wonder what the "mission" was?
Vickie
Silver Searcher said:Here's a bit more, early German Gold Ducatvastik said:Indeed! There is some good research going on here folks
I wonder what the "mission" was?
Vickie
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2769
SS
SWR said:vastik said:Based on the fact that only "certain" Jesuit coins/medallions featured the all seeing eye, I'm thinking it was a "higher order" -- perhaps my theory of the Illuminati is correct.
Where did we obtain any "facts" that certain Jesuit coins/medallions featured the all seeing eye? You seem to be spinning speculation into facts![]()