gazzahk, all that speculation simply presumes anything was ever there. A couple of kids get excited about disturbed ground and a tree trunk chain thing (if we even accept THAT starting premises to be true or valid or worthy of any "treasure"). And everything after that, is all the telephone game, ever since then.
So a wrap up such as yours shown above, has too many implicit assumptions. For example, take point #3, for instance. What is the "it" they are referring to ? (Let's be honest): Answer: A) That "there was super deep tunnel shafts dug that the boys found. B) That there was timber and chamber rooms.
Who ever said either those things was even fact to begin with ?
I find A & B to be nothing but dreamy eyed treasure fever telephone game speculation. Thus postage stamp wrapups such as this one, are just assuming their own end notions. Ie.: using the
end conclusion as the
starting point of a conversation.
