Please go to my website to view this amazing coin. If you can offer any assistance in identifying its origins, I would be most grateful.
www.mysterycoin.com
www.mysterycoin.com
In a Mold now you say? as in a cast coin? so you now think this item was cast in the 16th century? of tin? i think i am going to go eat some jam now!vastik said:OOOOh, me bad
Sorry Johhnyi, I have to laugh. Don't forget that the elements mentioned are also used to make molds. The "residue" could be from a mold. In person it looks flat, like an original part of the coin. If the "coin" was produced in a mold, then the "residue" would likely be melted onto it.
And the whole jam idea, well, it deserves a laugh.![]()
Thanks. The more information you can give us, the better chance of the proper ID. I dont know if its been talked about, but is this Tin, Copper, and Indium? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiumvastik said:Okay everyone, these stats are copied and pasted off the actual metallurgy reports.
Let me know your thoughts.
Area 1 Face of coin
Spectrum processing :
No peaks omitted
Processing option : All elements analyzed (Normalised)
Number of iterations = 1
Standard :
Cu Cu 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM
In InAs 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM
Sn Sn 1-Jun-1999 12:00 AM
scratcher said:I see where you are going BCH. Indium wasn't used much until after WWII. Out of curiosity vastic, how did you come up with the 'coin' weighing 8grams? Thanks in advance.
Johnnyi...you know nothing, since when have I said this was realjohnnyi said:Ha ha! Yes vastik, you have silver searcher convinced this is real. We all know that. If you want us to help you, part of that is acknowledgng that there is residue, and explaining what use it might have had.
You made a statement vastik, "I've been looking this piece over and there is definitely no glue residue on it." You continued making the same statement over and over.
Now we suddenly learn that the very University which you proclaimed was the last word, has told us about the "Area of residue on back" which they clearly saw, an area which you denied even existed, despite being privy to the report days ago!
I don't expect you to explain that, as your modus operandi so far has been to weave and bob, laugh gayly, be slow in revealing information unless pressed for it (such as the size) , and of course accuse the entire forum on occasion of "not having lives" when they do make attempts to research your object with results that don't match your theories.
If I stumble upon the item your little relic belonged to I will be sure to post it for you, as I'm sure other members who've already been wise enough to leave would do also, whether it be the Sword of Damacles or the insert to a jar of Trapest preserves.
vastik said:scratcher said:I see where you are going BCH. Indium wasn't used much until after WWII. Out of curiosity vastic, how did you come up with the 'coin' weighing 8grams? Thanks in advance.
I have been told by a friend that it may be from WWII era, so that makes sense Scratcher. This friend tends to think it's related to the Nazi's because of the symbolism. The owner of the coin told me it weighed approximately 8 grams. When he first got the coin we thought it was silver by the weight.
Yet another friend, who is a 35-year veteran Mason, thought it might be related to the Templars and perhaps it came off of a Templar sword, or something similar. He is sending the photos to the Grand Poobah of the Canadian Masons.
BCH:
I have asked the owner to take pictures of the side view, and he said he would. I don't know when he will get a chance to, but when I get them I will post them.
While I admit that I am having quite a laugh with the jokers on this forum (I know, I'm bad), I really would like to find another similar item so I can identify it's possible origins.
Thanks for your help.
SS, with all due respect, I cant recall you ever making a correct ID here at TN but I recall many by johhnny. Can you post this dagger handle? I must have missed it.Silver Searcher said:By the way Your Dagger Handle was correctly ID by myself and PBK...hard for you to except I know, because somebody from the UK got it rightjust Green Check it like it should have been weeks ago
![]()
Yes I posted the book, wine bottle and gift box ideas a while back (reply # 93)..IronSpike said:I think johnnyi was just steering in direction of wine bottle/jam jar based observation this appear to be a one sided object and not a coin/token.
Here's another idea: Medallion for a book
http://shop.ce-bookcovers.com/index.cgi?code=3&cat=2
IronSpike said:I think johnnyi was just steering in direction of wine bottle/jam jar based observation this appear to be a one sided object and not a coin/token.
Here's another idea: Medallion for a book
http://shop.ce-bookcovers.com/index.cgi?code=3&cat=2
Then you are very narrow minded, and obviously Blindbigcypresshunter said:SS, with all due respect, I cant recall you ever making a correct ID here at TN but I recall many by johhnny. Can you post this dagger handle? I must have missed it.Silver Searcher said:By the way Your Dagger Handle was correctly ID by myself and PBK...hard for you to except I know, because somebody from the UK got it rightjust Green Check it like it should have been weeks ago
![]()
It was probably uncalled for but I cant delete it now. Opposing views are always welcome. I was hoping you would show me the dagger link because I honestly missed it.Silver Searcher said:Then you are very narrow minded, and obviously Blindbigcypresshunter said:SS, with all due respect, I cant recall you ever making a correct ID here at TN but I recall many by johhnny. Can you post this dagger handle? I must have missed it.Silver Searcher said:By the way Your Dagger Handle was correctly ID by myself and PBK...hard for you to except I know, because somebody from the UK got it rightjust Green Check it like it should have been weeks ago
![]()
and your comment uncalled for.
SS
Don't worry BCY, I won't be bothering trying to help in this thread anymore. Obviously the hours I spend, and links posted are a waste of time and effort, when you just get comments like that.bigcypresshunter said:It was probably uncalled for but I cant delete it now. Opposing views are always welcome. I was hoping you would show me the dagger link because I honestly missed it.Silver Searcher said:Then you are very narrow minded, and obviously Blindbigcypresshunter said:SS, with all due respect, I cant recall you ever making a correct ID here at TN but I recall many by johhnny. Can you post this dagger handle? I must have missed it.Silver Searcher said:By the way Your Dagger Handle was correctly ID by myself and PBK...hard for you to except I know, because somebody from the UK got it rightjust Green Check it like it should have been weeks ago
![]()
and your comment uncalled for.
SS
I just want you to realize that johhnyi has a good track record here of great IDs, in the short time he has been here, and that needs to be taken into consideration.