- #141
Thread Owner
Hi chalkoutline, have you also entertained the aweful possibility that you are totally wrong, you say that that you have proved it false, to who's satisfaction you and your buddies? Unlike you I except that the Money Pit was excavated in the way that the old records describe. If you read my book you would know that I (and at least one other writer of several OI books have attributed the excavations to be the work of Cornish Miners, they dug mines stretching miles underground so it's safe to assume they were well aware of the necessity to use cribbing or not.Oi Sage,
My true focus is on whether or not the MP story is real or not. You should know my approach and methods by now.
I do not just state its a hoax wothout evidence.
I also do not just say "no one would bury a treasure that deep so it is a hoax" although its common sense its not evidence either.
My approach assumes its true then i focus on "could they have done what they claim and how they would have done it.
Then i look for all the information i can find.. typically i start with a simple question to Google AI...can someone dig a 100ft shaft without cribbing in 1700? Adding 1700 to the question is extremely important to get a period correct response.
When google ai states No, i now have to fact check Google AI.
I research soil makeup,
I researched the bedrock on OI how it fractures, natural cavities, water ingress and sinkholes
i researched how wells were dug,
i research how vertical shafts are dug with cribbing,
i research how holes are dug without cribbing
I put time and effort into all my research before i ever post in this forum because its a tough crowd.
Like i mentioned, im only focused on proving the MP story is true or false. Today i proved it false so my research is complete.
With regards to your research. I have no interest in a new theory/story; however, i am a fact checker and clearly you have many holes in it. Holes mean its just another story nothing more and i am not talking about evidence and citations.
Im talking about a theory that can be defended when challenge. Which you cannot.
Lets take look at your last claim...
"Someone has to be first..."
Come on you don't know "they" were first?
You just came up with that angle to get the last word.
But you are correct though... there are firsts but they don't come out of thin air. They are concieved from improving or applying existing technology in a different application.
So its my opinion, you need to research the "how" would they do that and make sure the methods are period correct.
I proved the MP story is exaggerated [cribbingis an absolute must]. I know you, don't agree but what if im right. Will your theory still work or is it solely dependent on the MP story being true. You need to work through this scenario and have an answer.
You came to this forum to promote your book: however, i think you got lucky because you should now realize where the holes are in your theory and you have time to plug them before you meet with rick and marty.
-CO
Whether or not the method the original miners employed in the excavation of the Money Pit was the first example is actually irrelevant, the old records indicate that it was achieved by them without the need for cribbing and that is what many people are prepared to except as a fact.
You are quite correct in one point though, if I fail to convince Marty, Craig and Rick, the treasure will probably never be recovered. In that event the whole world (who need a lift in spirits after the pandemic) will sadly be denied it. My only consolation then is knowing that any of the hot shot critics and self opiniated doubter's who have nothing of real value to contribute themselves, will also loose out.
We have an old saying in England, "If the cap fits you - then wear it".
Oak Island Sage







