I will give the forum member I put on ignore one chance to substantiate his claims.
It's simple, because you haven't solved the maps, that was done over 15 years ago with published evidence in 'Anson's Gold'.
I own a copy of
Anson's Gold. There is not a single mention of Rainbow Island (or Louis Tracy) in it nor a reproduction of the RI map from the novel (I was the first to scan and upload to the internet). Your book has a bibliography but does not either mention Tracy (nor his birth name) or any of his literature. If you are claiming you somehow knew of the tin cannister/RI map before me in relation to the Kidd-Palmer maps,
where is your evidence? None of your books mention either the tin cannister or Rainbow Island (RI) map and none of your internet comments mentioned or alluded to either of these prior to my thread (you obviously read). As another poster
pointed out: "someone coming out after somebodies else discovery claiming to have known all along without any evidence smells at least extremely bad."
To remind readers, the following is what you were instead claiming in
Anson's Gold:
You were evidently oblivious to the Rainbow Island map and instead claimed the Kidd-Palmer maps were based on a c
ompletely different map dated 1795 (Juan Fernandez Island aka Robinson Crusoe Island) by inverting it. Of course, you are wrong about that as well. The hoaxer who drew the Kidd-Palmer maps did not use an 18th century Juan Fernandez map at all but the Rainbow Island map. The Juan Fernandez map does not have a lagoon or similar topography to what appears on the Skeleton Map and the fact you have to invert the maps to show a superficial resemblance in shape only shows you are (to quote Sherlock Holmes): "twist[ing] facts to suit theories". As further evidence you did not know of the RI map (before me), your book (and internet comments you posted) were incorrectly claiming that 'Smuggler's Cove' on the Skeleton Map, is on the Juan Fernandez Island map as 'Padre Bay':
So much for your book solving the Kidd-Palmer maps. You were not even close and way off the mark.
Smuggler's Cove on the Skeleton Map has nothing to do with Padre Bay on the Juan Fernandez Island map. As I proved in my own thread (and was the first to do so), Smuggler's Cove was copied from Smuggler's Cove on the RI map (it is the
exact same annotated place name on both maps and in the
same position). Nothing whatsoever to do with Padre Bay.
Which reminds me, and you keep avoiding, the Kidd chart figures were not seen for the first time on the Rainbow Island map, they appeared over 150 years earlier on Anson's monument having originally come from the Spanish. It is all so obvious to everyone but you. Can't wait to see your book (you'll have to pay for the printing!) and the fantasy story you concoct to try and prove otherwise.
There is no latitude and longitude written on "Anson's monument". I presume you mean the Shugborough inscription:
The staff at Shugborough Hall have
stated they get "five or six people a week who believe they have solved the code so we are a bit wary of them now." You claim to have deciphered or solved the inscription alongside thousands of other people who are non-experts. There is no evidence to begin with that O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V is a cryptogram (that requires a cipher); for example, some propose a much more mundane solution: the letters are merely graffiti or commemorative initials of past estate owners. I am not aware of a single academic who has ever taken your idea seriously and a
search of your book on Google Scholar
produces zero results. Your book was published a decade ago but does not have a single academic citation and the fact you published your far-fetched theory in a vanity-press book rather than a peer-reviewed article in a journal speaks for itself. Your book is highly speculative and pseudohistory like
The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail.*
For readers who do not own the book, page 519:
There is no evidence presented in the book that there is a "hidden" latitude and longitude in the inscription. It is all speculation and guesswork with numbers, albeit that is very implausible. I personally prefer a much more simple solution to what the inscription means.
*Anson's Gold in fact references The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and repeats unfounded claims about Rennes-le-Château.