ECS
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2012
- Messages
- 11,638
- Reaction score
- 17,695
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Ocala,Florida
- Primary Interest:
- Other
As noted on another thread where Neiman's letter was posted, Neiman states the sample is modern, possibly 300 years old dated it to 1693 not the 1300's, and "may not be scientifically reliable"- in other words, proving nothing.
How is it that you possess this alleged "complete inventory" of a French treasure given to the American Colonies 30 years BEFORE the Declaration of Independence?
...and TEMPLARS in existence and possessing treasure at the end of the 17th century?
The fact that only you having this information while lettered academic historians do not, without providing supporting evidence from one that claimed Shakespeare was illiterate, Prince Charles Stuart was ILLUMINATTI, Sinclair led a cavalry charge of 300 Templars at Bannockburn and so on with all proven wrong by real solid documentation, makes your Oak Island treasures tales, questionable.
How is it that you possess this alleged "complete inventory" of a French treasure given to the American Colonies 30 years BEFORE the Declaration of Independence?
...and TEMPLARS in existence and possessing treasure at the end of the 17th century?
The fact that only you having this information while lettered academic historians do not, without providing supporting evidence from one that claimed Shakespeare was illiterate, Prince Charles Stuart was ILLUMINATTI, Sinclair led a cavalry charge of 300 Templars at Bannockburn and so on with all proven wrong by real solid documentation, makes your Oak Island treasures tales, questionable.