3cyl, if you think a rule is being broken report it, but members are allowed to respectfully disagree with a thread, especially when it is based on treasure legends, and treasure stories.
The mystery gets solved this side of Christmas but not by the Laginas. Drllling the Money Pit is a waste of time money and resources. The answer has been above ground for 800 years for anyone able to read the instructions.
There is no mystery anymore for Oak Island. The Knigts Templar surveyed Mahone Bay from approx 1180 and commenced constuction approximately 1200 from plans drawn up in Europe with the assistance of Cistercian Monks.
There is absolutely no evidence from the historical record or archaeology that supports the theory Knights Templar or Cistercians reached the Americas before 1492. Any claim of a transatlantic Templar voyage during the Middle Ages remains at best pure speculation. You might as well believe a waterspout transported some medieval peasants from England across the Atlantic Ocean to North America in 1132.
Why does not a single credentialed historian agree with you? I don't believe in the waterspout theory, I used that an example to show how baseless your claim is. Based on what you have posted so far, you do not give me the impression that your approach is remotely evidence-based but I will nonetheless recommend to you Kenneth L. Feder's Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology.
You mentioned the solution is in the public and won't be solved by the laguinas. Who else would it be?
They have a majority stake in the island and in all likelihood will be the ones to put the spade in the ground unless the Nova Scotian authorities with responsibility for enforcing the Special Places Protection Act intervene but finding and solving are two different things.
My point about the absence of support from credentialed historians and other relevant experts like archaeologists is that your claim — that the Templars had travelled to North America — is not a new claim that historians have simply overlooked. Claims of pre-Columbian Templar contact have been examined and scrutinised for multiple decades by specialists in medieval history, archaeology, as well as pre-Columbian contact. The fact that the claim has not gained acceptance among any specialists over decades is strong evidence when assessing how well supported the claim is and its probability (your claim is not credible and is extremely improbable). Of course, historians are not infallible but when a specific historical claim has been subjected to specialist scrutiny for many years and has failed to produce evidence that specialists regard as sufficient, that is a compelling reason to regard the claim as improbable and/or to reject it. What evidence is there the Templars actually travelled to North America? Calling the claim "factual" (like you did) does not answer that question. You are arguing by assertion.
